Warpath

Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Parking Lot (http://www.thewarpath.net/parking-lot/)
-   -   Lions | C. Rogers might be able to keep his bonus (http://www.thewarpath.net/parking-lot/11762-lions-c-rogers-might-able-keep.html)

That Guy 03-24-2006 09:54 AM

Lions | C. Rogers might be able to keep his bonus
 
[B]Lions | C. Rogers might be able to keep his bonus[/B]
Fri, 24 Mar 2006 05:21:48 -0800
Mike O'Hara, of the Detroit News, reports [URL="http://www.kffl.com/team/16/nfl"]Detroit Lions[/URL] WR [URL="http://www.kffl.com/player/5911/nfl"]Charles Rogers[/URL] may be able to keep his full signing bonus because of the new collective bargaining agreement being reached. As part of the extension, the power has swung from owners to the players in the so-called "disciplinary" clauses. For Rogers, that means the [URL="http://www.kffl.com/team/16/nfl"]Lions[/URL] aren't likely to prevail in their bid to reclaim more than $10 million of the $14 million rookie signing bonus Rogers received as a first-round draft pick in 2003. The [URL="http://www.kffl.com/team/77/nfl"]NFL[/URL] Players Association's position last year was that the [URL="http://www.kffl.com/team/16/nfl"]Lions[/URL] had no right to go after a player's signing bonus and that forfeiting the game checks was the appropriate punishment. The union's position now is that "disciplinary" clauses in the extension, which are still being fine-tuned as negotiations continue, strengthen their stand. Rogers' agent, Kevin Poston, has been in contact with the union and said he never doubted that the signing bonus was off limits.



so apparently doing drugs is alright. you don't have to work and you still get paid... I hope pwned doesn't learn the wrong lesson from this.

TheMalcolmConnection 03-24-2006 11:07 AM

Re: Lions | C. Rogers might be able to keep his bonus
 
That's something that really did piss me off about the new CBA. Basically it means that the players can act like total jackasses and get away with it.

dmek25 03-24-2006 11:36 AM

Re: Lions | C. Rogers might be able to keep his bonus
 
because rogers signed that deal prior to the new cba,would that contract be grandfathered to the old cba

That Guy 03-24-2006 11:56 AM

Re: Lions | C. Rogers might be able to keep his bonus
 
apparently not. I think the SB thing was in response to what happened to Ricky Williams. Its really hard to give back money you've already spent, and in the real world, it'd be illegal (unless you had behavoir clauses in the contract or some such. But even then, you'd think those clauses would be tied to future option bonuses, and not money they've already given you).

In other words, it sucks, but (after the rookie contract) It makes sense. Rookie contracts have to have a lot of guaranteed money though and generally don't have an easy way to tie money to clauses with so much in unguarded signing bonus.

D'BOYZ 03-24-2006 12:01 PM

Re: Lions | C. Rogers might be able to keep his bonus
 
Yeah I believe tha t2 and I also don't agree with that part of the new CBA I believe that the NFLPA did wrong putting that in the CBA.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.05057 seconds with 8 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25