The Ultimate NFL Depth Chart
 

Just finished ranking the RB's and WR's for the Ultimate NFL Depth Chart on ESPN.com and after submitting I saw the national results so far. The Redskins according to the voters currently rank sixth in both categories. What do guys think?

Re: The Ultimate NFL Depth Chart
 

6th seems respectable.

Re: The Ultimate NFL Depth Chart
 

They ranked 6th when ESPN did that chart this morning, also. They had the Giants 5th though, which I don't agree with at all.

Re: The Ultimate NFL Depth Chart
 

I agree. For being unproven so far, that's being pretty generous. I would stil put us at #3 RB-wise though.

Re: The Ultimate NFL Depth Chart
 

[quote=Southpaw]They ranked 6th when ESPN did that chart this morning, also. They had the Giants 5th though, which I don't agree with at all.[/quote]

5th at what? RB or WR? If WR, I TOTALLY disagree with that. They have Plexico and Shockey. We have Cooley, Moss and although unproven they're better than what else the Giants have in Patten, Lloyd and Randle El.

Re: The Ultimate NFL Depth Chart
 

[quote=TheMalcolmConnection]5th at what? RB or WR? If WR, I TOTALLY disagree with that. They have Plexico and Shockey. We have Cooley, Moss and although unproven they're better than what else the Giants have in Patten, Lloyd and Randle El.[/quote]

They had them at 5th in the running game. Tiki is talented, but he is getting a little long in the tooth. I'm predicting he'll have a year like Priest Holmes had last year. Hopefully the fumblitus will come back too.

Re: The Ultimate NFL Depth Chart
 

Well, I'll deal with Tiki putting the Giants at 5 considering how he ran last year. I definitely don't think he'll be back like that next year though.

Re: The Ultimate NFL Depth Chart
 

I take more issue with Atlanta being ranked ahead of Washington than the New York Giants. I don't see Dunn and Vick as better than the Skins running game.

Re: The Ultimate NFL Depth Chart
 

Yeah, I agree there. They're going strictly on the fact that all Atlanta COULD do was run the ball. Check out their running attempts versus ours.

Re: The Ultimate NFL Depth Chart
 

I was pretty happy with sixth in both categories. Maybe 5 in RB. As far as depth goes we have great depth at WR/TE. Probably better than the Giants. The whole point of this chart was to rank teams not on individual talent but the overall depth at that position. This made me a little dissappointed in their selction of Manning and Brady as the #2 and #1 respectively. If either one goes down who's their proven reliable backup? Personally, as much as I hate to admit it, the Eagles have pretty good depth.

Re: The Ultimate NFL Depth Chart
 

[quote=724Skinsfan]Personally, as much as I hate to admit it, the Eagles have pretty good depth.[/quote]

depth with???? coy detmer? thats a joke... or jeff garcia who threw twice as many interceptions as touchdowns in the 6 games he played last season i wouldnt exactly call that reliable

Re: The Ultimate NFL Depth Chart
 

[quote=Hail2theskins]depth with???? coy detmer? thats a joke... or jeff garcia who threw twice as many interceptions as touchdowns in the 6 games he played last season i wouldnt exactly call that reliable[/quote]

I'd say a career 85.8 QB rating along with 19k passing yards and 126 TD passes makes for a fairly reliable backup QB in a familiar West Coast offense.

Re: The Ultimate NFL Depth Chart
 

yeah but you have to look at what hes done recently, just because his stats of old are good doesnt mean he can still play

Re: The Ultimate NFL Depth Chart
 

I'm glad Joe Gibbs didn't follow that way of thinking and focused on Brunell's 2003 and 2004 stats rather than his overall career performance.

Re: The Ultimate NFL Depth Chart
 

Garcia's numbers have been on a steady decline since his 2002 season, you cant compare those two at all, your argument is irrelvant to the fact that they are two entirely different people just because brunell bounced back doesnt mean garcia is going to