Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Warrick Holdman Haters (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=14258)

tika49 09-11-2006 11:20 PM

Warrick Holdman Haters
 
Hey for all you Warrick Holdman hater, and Lavar lovers, I think the Kid held his own and did a good job alongside Lemar and Marcus

MTK 09-11-2006 11:20 PM

Re: Warrick Holdman Haters
 
He played well.

TAYLOR21 09-11-2006 11:22 PM

Re: Warrick Holdman Haters
 
man who gives a fu** about lavar hes in ny now!!

Big C 09-11-2006 11:28 PM

Re: Warrick Holdman Haters
 
warrick did look good, props to him. linebackers were the only decent unit of the defense tonight

Gmanc711 09-12-2006 12:02 AM

Re: Warrick Holdman Haters
 
Honestly....I saw the game live so I cant be sure, but he looked like he played maybe better than anyone on the team.

Beemnseven 09-12-2006 12:06 AM

Re: Warrick Holdman Haters
 
This has nothing to do with Holdman, because I thought he was decent tonight, but...

Would it kill the defense to force a turnover? For as quick as they are to get to the ball carrier, you'd think there'd be some sort of emphasis on ripping the ball away.

That's another knock on this D. Turnovers don't come easy for them.

#56fanatic 09-12-2006 08:59 AM

Re: Warrick Holdman Haters
 
I am just not impressed with Holdman. they still ran the ball quite well to that side of the field. He looked like he took a couple of wrong angles going for tackles. I think he looks a lot better physically this year than he did last year. Maybe a little quicker. I did see him running around more, compared to last year. I wouldn't mind seeing Rocky play a little more. He is a beast, we just need him to learn the D a little faster.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha 09-12-2006 12:27 PM

Re: Warrick Holdman Haters
 
[QUOTE=Beemnseven;214124]This has nothing to do with Holdman, because I thought he was decent tonight, but...

Would it kill the defense to force a turnover? For as quick as they are to get to the ball carrier, you'd think there'd be some sort of emphasis on ripping the ball away.

That's another knock on this D. Turnovers don't come easy for them.[/QUOTE]

They actually forced a fumble (that went out of bounds) and almost had two picks, they just couldn't seal the deal. That was the case early last year. I think they'll turn it around, like they did late last year.

ArtMonkDrillz 09-12-2006 12:59 PM

Re: Warrick Holdman Haters
 
They also forced Johnson to fumble, but their o-lineman recovered it.

freddyg12 09-12-2006 01:31 PM

Re: Warrick Holdman Haters
 
Holdman played well, the run d was solid, we just couldn't stop them on 3rd down.
Anyone notice how the gmen hardly played lavar in passing situations?

That Guy 09-12-2006 10:19 PM

Re: Warrick Holdman Haters
 
they had 2 FF, but neither one was recovered.

holdman looked okay, and i wasn't against keeping him (cheap depth), but he was definately terrible last year.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.90974 seconds with 9 queries