Randy McMichael Might Be Available
 

So the inevitable question is should we consider going after him?

[url=http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2788825]ESPN.com - NFL - Report: Dolphins to release tight end McMichael[/url]

Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
 

I say no. We have bigger fish to fry.

Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
 

He might not be a need, but he'd be a nice luxury. I've always liked him, outside of his domestic disputes, I like the way he plays.

Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
 

[QUOTE=FRPLG;284635]I say no. We have bigger fish to fry.[/QUOTE]

For the record I agree. Just curious what the board thinks. I think the only additions we should make on offense are on the line. Some say our WR corps needs to be upgraded, I say they need more time together

But McMichael can definitely play, just shouldn't be our priority

Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
 

[QUOTE=SmootSmack;284637]For the record I agree. Just curious what the board thinks. I think the only additions we should make on offense are on the line. Some say our WR corps needs to be upgraded, I say they need more time together

But McMichael can definitely play, just shouldn't be our priority[/QUOTE]

Count me in with the "no thanks" crowd. Many people say we need another tight end. I don't agree. There aren't many double TE sets in Saunders' offense anyway.

Get a blocking TE through undrafted free agency, that should do it for us.

Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
 

[quote=FRPLG;284635]I say no. We have bigger fish to fry.[/quote]

1 question: what kind of fish will be be frying?

Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
 

I figured if we did go after a free agent TE it would be more of a blocker than catching TE.

Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
 

Although having McMichael would be cool, I say we shouldn't get him. But him just being on the market is good for us. It means that other TE's values go down because there is now more and better options than them, and it also means that those people searching for TE's might potentially get McMichael instead of a guy that we want to target.

Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
 

I hope we can sign Yoder fairly cheap. This guy is a solid blocker and can catch very well. I hope they give this guy a shot, he could be a solid backup to the Capt........COOOOOLEY!

McMichael, to low on the priority list.

Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
 

McMichael might be looking for a pretty big contract as well, and plus we have bigger needs to address.

Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
 

he's going to be looking to come in as the starter...but if he is willing to sign a 1 year deal to serve as the backup then lets do it

Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
 

[quote=Bbaker24;284668]he's going to be looking to come in as the starter...but if he is willing to sign a 1 year deal to serve as the backup then lets do it[/quote]

I doubt he's lookin at one year? He's definitely isn't looking for backup cash. McMichael can play!

Don't NEED to be wasting cash on a upper end TE. We have other areas of higher concern.

Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
 

Could someone please tell me why all the hu-bub about a blocking TE in this offense?

Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
 

[quote=NM Redskin;284654]I figured if we did go after a free agent TE it would be more of a blocker than catching TE.[/quote]


True Cooley is not a great blocker... McMicheal is even worse, we need at least one decent blocking TE. Plus McMicheal will make some bank in FA.

Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available
 

[QUOTE=DGreene28;284701]True Cooley is not a great blocker... McMicheal is even worse, we need at least one decent blocking TE. Plus McMicheal will make some bank in FA.[/QUOTE]

Welcome to the board

Why'd you put an "e" at the end of Green?

Where in CT do you live?