Warpath

Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Redskins Locker Room (http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-locker-room/)
-   -   Scouts Inc WR rankings (http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-locker-room/18896-scouts-inc-wr-rankings.html)

Mattyk 07-16-2007 04:06 PM

Scouts Inc WR rankings
 
Link: [URL]http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/insider/news/story?id=2921051[/URL]

[B]22. [/B][URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=was"][B][COLOR=#000000]Washington Redskins[/COLOR][/B][/URL]
Obviously, the Redskins did not get their money's worth with the acquisitions of [URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=5948"][COLOR=#000000]Antwaan Randle El[/COLOR][/URL] and [URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=6460"][COLOR=#000000]Brandon Lloyd[/COLOR][/URL]. They envisioned a dangerous three-receiver attack with these two and [URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=5463"][COLOR=#000000]Santana Moss[/COLOR][/URL]. The truth of the matter is that they still have one excellent wideout in Moss and two players who are much better suited as No. 3 receivers. Moss is small, but he is extremely dangerous when healthy. He can turn a hitch route into a 70-yard touchdown in the blink of an eye and can challenge any secondary deep. The Redskins' quarterback output has been subpar and we expect [URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=7201"][COLOR=#000000]Jason Campbell[/COLOR][/URL] to be much improved this season, but they simply have to get more from Randle El and Lloyd.

GusFrerotte 07-16-2007 04:10 PM

Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
 
Hearing that at least Lloyd was working with JC during the offseasson a bit does give hope that he will return to 49er form, which will kick ass and automatically open up things for Randle El and Santana. If they play like last year(Llyod and Randle El), our offense is going to stink it up again. Lloyd is better than Randle El for sure and more of a threat.

jdlea 07-16-2007 04:10 PM

Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
 
[QUOTE=Mattyk72;329262]Link: [URL]http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/insider/news/story?id=2921051[/URL]

[B]22. [/B][URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=was"][B][COLOR=#000000]Washington Redskins[/COLOR][/B][/URL]
Obviously, the Redskins did not get their money's worth with the acquisitions of [URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=5948"][COLOR=#000000]Antwaan Randle El[/COLOR][/URL] and [URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=6460"][COLOR=#000000]Brandon Lloyd[/COLOR][/URL]. They envisioned a dangerous three-receiver attack with these two and [URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=5463"][COLOR=#000000]Santana Moss[/COLOR][/URL]. The truth of the matter is that they still have one excellent wideout in Moss and two players who are much better suited as No. 3 receivers. Moss is small, but he is extremely dangerous when healthy. He can turn a hitch route into a 70-yard touchdown in the blink of an eye and can challenge any secondary deep. The Redskins' quarterback output has been subpar and we expect [URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=7201"][COLOR=#000000]Jason Campbell[/COLOR][/URL] to be much improved this season, but they simply have to get more from Randle El and Lloyd.[/QUOTE]

Based on last season, I would be somewhat inclined to agree with him. HOWEVA, I expect both Randle El and Lloyd to be MUCH improved this season. I think Randle El could very possibly break out and establish himself as a legit #2 and I, personally, love what he brings to the table as a wild card offensively. I think this group will be much better this season with a QB who can stretch the field and a better comfort level with the offense and Jason Campbell.

dmek25 07-16-2007 04:15 PM

Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
 
im not the ultimate homer, but come on. can anyone name more then 5 or 6 that are better?

D'BOYZ 07-16-2007 04:33 PM

Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
 
based on last year 22 is about right I was really desapointed with Lloyds and randall production I tought they would be better specially Lloyd not so much Randall he's for me a 5 good plays per year player that's all

What spot did dallas was ranked?

RobH4413 07-16-2007 04:43 PM

Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
 
I really think our stats were deflated last year, so I'm really not surprised at all.

I love getting low balled anyways, so then we can be the feel good story this upcoming season.

firstdown 07-16-2007 04:52 PM

Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
 
[quote=D'BOYZ;329295]based on last year 22 is about right I was really desapointed with Lloyds and randall production I tought they would be better specially Lloyd not so much Randall he's for me a 5 good plays per year player that's all

What spot did dallas was ranked?[/quote]
Now you really want us to believe that you where disapointed in Lloyds and El's production last year. Yea right. Come on you usually say it how it is.

firstdown 07-16-2007 04:55 PM

Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
 
[quote=GusFrerotte;329266]Hearing that at least Lloyd was working with JC during the offseasson a bit does give hope that he will return to 49er form, which will kick ass and automatically open up things for Randle El and Santana. If they play like last year(Llyod and Randle El), our offense is going to stink it up again. Lloyd is better than Randle El for sure and more of a threat.[/quote]
Also Lloyd has been working out as well. I think that he knows he could be playing this year for his NFL career. Another bad season we would let him go and who would even pick him up and if they did it might be for vet minimum.

GTripp0012 07-16-2007 05:22 PM

Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
 
See [URL="http://www.redskinswarpath.com/329338-post15.html"]post[/URL].

[quote=GTripp0012;329338]This analysis is most likely correct, but very simplistic in its nature. I don't think I learned anything I didn't already know from reading this report.[/quote]

D'BOYZ 07-16-2007 05:30 PM

Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
 
[quote=firstdown;329311]Now you really want us to believe that you where disapointed in Lloyds and El's production last year. Yea right. Come on you usually say it how it is.[/quote]

I was dissapointed i nthe matter that I said you would have 1 of the best receiving sets in the league that with moss game play, Lloyds going in the middle and Randall game changing plays combine with Sauders offense it would be a very deadly offense.

But it turned out to be Vanilla I've never liked Randall I've sai tha tbut I tought Lloyd was a good addition that's why I was dissapointed because I tought it would be a better offense.

atomicnixon 07-16-2007 07:10 PM

Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
 
[quote=Mattyk72;329262]Link: [URL]http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/insider/news/story?id=2921051[/URL]

[B]22. [/B][URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=was"][B][COLOR=#000000]Washington Redskins[/COLOR][/B][/URL]
Obviously, the Redskins did not get their money's worth with the acquisitions of [URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=5948"][COLOR=#000000]Antwaan Randle El[/COLOR][/URL] and [URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=6460"][COLOR=#000000]Brandon Lloyd[/COLOR][/URL]. They envisioned a dangerous three-receiver attack with these two and [URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=5463"][COLOR=#000000]Santana Moss[/COLOR][/URL]. The truth of the matter is that they still have one excellent wideout in Moss and two players who are much better suited as No. 3 receivers. Moss is small, but he is extremely dangerous when healthy. He can turn a hitch route into a 70-yard touchdown in the blink of an eye and can challenge any secondary deep. The Redskins' quarterback output has been subpar and we expect [URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=7201"][COLOR=#000000]Jason Campbell[/COLOR][/URL] to be much improved this season, but they simply have to get more from Randle El and Lloyd.[/quote]

I think it was the new offense. We have hashed this over and over again, but seriously I think our offense will be as explosive as the '91 Redskins. As for the defense, that remains to be seen.

EARTHQUAKE2689 07-16-2007 07:42 PM

Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
 
That's funny at this time last year, we would have been like 3rd or 4th.

GTripp0012 07-16-2007 08:18 PM

Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
 
[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;329405]That's funny at this time last year, we would have been like 3rd or 4th.[/quote]And were.

Shows how much these "rankings" are worth.

EARTHQUAKE2689 07-16-2007 08:30 PM

Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
 
[quote=GTripp0012;329439]And were.

Shows how much these "rankings" are worth.[/quote]


exactly.

GTripp0012 07-16-2007 08:31 PM

Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
 
[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;329447]exactly.[/quote]right-e-o.

I'm being sucked into your game, Quake.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.08792 seconds with 8 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25