Warpath

Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Parking Lot (http://www.thewarpath.net/parking-lot/)
-   -   Actual Madden 2008 Redskins Ratings (http://www.thewarpath.net/parking-lot/19182-actual-madden-2008-redskins-ratings.html)

EARTHQUAKE2689 08-07-2007 03:14 PM

Actual Madden 2008 Redskins Ratings
 
[url=http://sports.ign.com/madden08/redskins.html]IGN Madden08 Redskins[/url]

Madden Ratings

mredskins 08-07-2007 04:38 PM

Re: Actual Madden 2008 Redskins Ratings
 
The sad part about this is that our highest rated player is already hurt this year!

EARTHQUAKE2689 08-07-2007 04:44 PM

Re: Actual Madden 2008 Redskins Ratings
 
London Fletcher isnt hurt. He is our highest rated player.

mredskins 08-07-2007 04:48 PM

Re: Actual Madden 2008 Redskins Ratings
 
good eye. I saw Samuels at 94. I don't think fletcher is the best player on our team.

EARTHQUAKE2689 08-07-2007 05:05 PM

Re: Actual Madden 2008 Redskins Ratings
 
I find it funny that Portis got only 70 for an injury rating

KingofFantasy654 08-07-2007 05:44 PM

Re: Actual Madden 2008 Redskins Ratings
 
I'm I the only person who prefers Madden pre-2000?

mooby 08-07-2007 10:29 PM

Re: Actual Madden 2008 Redskins Ratings
 
About time, I was wondering when these ratings were coming out. Eh, i'm not suprised, the Redskins sucked last year therefore their ratings aren't gonna be good this year. Nothing a little editing can't fix.

jsarno 08-07-2007 11:48 PM

Re: Actual Madden 2008 Redskins Ratings
 
Moss should be a 93 or 94, not an 88, and Fletcher should be an 88 or 89, maybe a 90, but not a 95.
I also think Sellers is a 90 or so. He's an amazing blocker.

EARTHQUAKE2689 08-07-2007 11:51 PM

Re: Actual Madden 2008 Redskins Ratings
 
[quote=jsarno;337447]Moss should be a 93 or 94, not an 88, and Fletcher should be an 88 or 89, maybe a 90, but not a 95.
I also think Sellers is a 90 or so. He's an amazing blocker.[/quote]


It is all about what have you done for me lately. And in 2006 we sucked. And Fletcher was a 94 last season, look at his stats he is 95 worthy.

jsarno 08-08-2007 12:02 AM

Re: Actual Madden 2008 Redskins Ratings
 
[QUOTE=EARTHQUAKE2689;337451]It is all about what have you done for me lately. And in 2006 we sucked. And Fletcher was a 94 last season, look at his stats he is 95 worthy.[/QUOTE]

But he's 32! There are predictions involved too, it's not all last years numbers.

What about Sellers then? He MADE Betts!

Also, Moss is still worth at least a 90...that's wrong.

The others seem fairly in line.

EARTHQUAKE2689 08-08-2007 12:25 AM

Re: Actual Madden 2008 Redskins Ratings
 
[quote=jsarno;337462]But he's 32! There are predictions involved too, it's not all last years numbers.

What about Sellers then? He MADE Betts!

Also, Moss is still worth at least a 90...that's wrong.

The others seem fairly in line.[/quote]


Remember our 07 ratings those tasted good. But after the roster updates we will be fine.

sandman89 08-08-2007 12:28 AM

Re: Actual Madden 2008 Redskins Ratings
 
[QUOTE=jsarno;337462]But he's 32! There are predictions involved too, it's not all last years numbers.

What about Sellers then? He MADE Betts!

Also, Moss is still worth at least a 90...that's wrong.

The others seem fairly in line.[/QUOTE]

Moss should be a 90.

Portis should be a 94 still but whatever.

Flecther imo is a 95 or more i mean dude hes 32 but urlacher and zack thomas are older and have the same rating.

Flecther is a monster LB and im excited for him.

Sellers should be an 85 great Blocker but thats all he RLY did but its whatever.

jsarno 08-08-2007 12:34 AM

Re: Actual Madden 2008 Redskins Ratings
 
[QUOTE=sandman89;337484]Moss should be a 90.

Portis should be a 94 still but whatever.

Flecther imo is a 95 or more i mean dude hes 32 but urlacher and zack thomas are older and have the same rating.

Flecther is a monster LB and im excited for him.

Sellers should be an 85 great Blocker but thats all he RLY did but its whatever.[/QUOTE]

Sellers can do it all, we just don't use him that way.
The man had 7 rec. td's 2 years ago!!!

Fletcher is no Urlacher or Thomas. Sorry.

GTripp0012 08-08-2007 12:36 AM

Re: Actual Madden 2008 Redskins Ratings
 
[quote=sandman89;337484]Moss should be a 90.

Portis should be a 94 still but whatever.

Flecther imo is a 95 or more i mean dude hes 32 but urlacher and zack thomas are older and have the same rating.

Flecther is a monster LB and im excited for him.

Sellers should be an 85 great Blocker but thats all he RLY did but its whatever.[/quote]Pretty sure Urlacher isn't 32. This is only his 8th year in the NFL. That puts him at 29 or 30.

I do think 95 is really high for Fletcher, he should probably be in the 85-90 range. I'm not sure he's a better MLB than Washington is a SLB, although MLB is the much harder position.

EARTHQUAKE2689 08-08-2007 12:40 AM

Re: Actual Madden 2008 Redskins Ratings
 
[quote=jsarno;337491]Sellers can do it all, we just don't use him that way.
The man had 7 rec. td's 2 years ago!!!

Fletcher is no Urlacher or Thomas. Sorry.[/quote]


Fletch is very underrated if you look at his stats they are just as good if not better than those two over the last7-8 years. But he is not Urlacher. But he was 94 last year and no one was complaining.

And Sellers had 5 or 6 of those from one yard out.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.08668 seconds with 8 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25