SI.Coms 2004 Redskins Preview
 

[url]http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21566-2004Jul28.html[/url]

Oh no it isn't.....Link goes to WP

Here's the correct link:

[url]http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/specials/preview/athlon/redskins.html[/url]

To me that was a pretty dead on evaluation of the skins.I did not however like how he mentioned that J.G strugled with parcels.Other than that it was good.

Not really thought provoking or shocking in any way, but it is a pretty good summary for those that missed our preseason movement.

[QUOTE=Redskins_P][url]http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21566-2004Jul28.html[/url][/QUOTE]

Shit...my bad fellas

[QUOTE=love them hogs]To me that was a pretty dead on evaluation of the skins.I did not however like how he mentioned that J.G strugled with parcels.Other than that it was good.[/QUOTE]

You nailed that one. What a BLAH piece. Everything in there has been floating around for ages. Nothing new or insightful.

Redskins_P, I was just being an ass, I should have just posted the correct URL.

Sorry.

[quote]The Redskins have addressed most of the weaknesses that contributed to a 5–11 record last season, though some holes appear to remain on defense, particularly free safety and defensive end.[/quote]

Maybe it's me, BUT FREE SAFETY IS PRETTY SOLID RIGHT NOW!

Is it just me, or did it seem like this guy picked up all of his information right here on the warpath

:smashfrea

I'm waiting for the real SI preview to come out. This is just a reprint of this spring's Athlon Sports preview, with a few changes. The real SI preview comes out with some analysis of what they saw during training camp and the preseason games

[QUOTE=RedskinRat]Redskins_P, I was just being an ass, I should have just posted the correct URL.

Sorry.[/QUOTE]


No worries man. I'm the one that goofed it.

Thanks for the post. :thumb: Nothing Really new though!

Whilst it is only someones opinion, 3 things made me react.

1) No mention of Jacobs. OK his inkury made him a non-event last year, but hte kid has ability. I'm surprised he hasn't been mentioned. I suspect Gibbs will get the most out of him - possibly moving up to 2nd/3rd WR?
2) The depth chart has Koslowski and Rasby as starters and the article has no mention of TE (an important position for Gibbs). No word on Cooley's potential then? The reports I've read say he'll make a good blocker AND receiver. Anyone else think he might force his way into the reckoning?
3) Why does Taylor starting at FS automatically mean Bowen moved to SS and Ohalete is out on his ear? I suspect there will be some serious competition between the 2 of them to partner Taylor.

no phillip daniels in the depth chart also