Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!
 

[url=http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/]Redskins Insider[/url]

Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!
 

Well, if we were looking at a way to have James Thrash not be the No. 2 receiver, just remember that the last time Todd Pinkston held such a role, Thrash was the No. 1 receiver.

Pinkston is garbage. Lloyd's probably better. TP won't make the cut.

Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!
 

All I have to say is WHY?

Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;339811]All I have to say is WHY?[/quote]They will torture us with irrelivant news until we give up!

He can...longsnap well, I guess. Albright has competition!

Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!
 

[QUOTE=EARTHQUAKE2689;339811]All I have to say is WHY?[/QUOTE]

Because playing for us is the only way he doesn't have to worry about #21 on gameday.

Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!
 

I would rather they just sign Art Monk or Gark Clark.

Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!
 

[QUOTE=wilsowilso;339820]I would rather they just sign Art Monk or Gark Clark.[/QUOTE]

Seriously. Hell, sign Charley Taylor instead of this dead weight.

Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!
 

Even if there's still a need there has to be someone better than Stinkston still out there.

Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!
 

you think Bradford is looking that bad?

Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!
 

[quote=djnemo65;339822]Even if there's still a need there has to be someone better than Stinkston still out there.[/quote]
why would they think there was a need? I'm not big on Mike Espy, but i would rather have him

Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!
 

retarted.

Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!
 

Well here it is from the skins site and they signed a DT today.

Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!
 

This doesn't help Campbell if he has to keep adjusting to new WRs. I understand the whole preseason depth/camp fodder argument. But I'd rather they just focus on repitition of the plays and formations with El, Moss, Thrash, and Espy (and Lloyd when he's healthy which better be damn soon). Those are going to be your guys at the start of the season. And if they're not, and it's Bradford and Pinkston, then we have a problem.

I gotta say though Espy did not look good Saturday

Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!
 

Hmmmm, I dont know why they signed him. A waste of a roster spot.

Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!
 

he sucks... but he might still be better than lloyd :(