Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Trading #85 (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=20495)

LaRon + Sean = Hell 4 U 10-25-2007 03:04 PM

Trading #85
 
The Bengals are thinking about trading #85 after this season I think he is worth giving up a draft pick. If T.J. Duckett & Brandon Lloyd was worth a draft pick #85 is definietly worth a draft pick. He is a proven NFL star he has the numbers to prove it. I don't see him as a distraction do you see Synder moving on #85 and would it be a good move for the franchise?

freddyg12 10-25-2007 03:13 PM

Re: Trading #85
 
While I'm definitely in the camp that says keep your draft picks, if we could acquire him w/out giving up too much, he'd be worth it. solid vet reciever, seems to have a good attitude, only this year he's been seen on the sidelines complaining about something.

Why do they want to trade him?

dmek25 10-25-2007 03:14 PM

Re: Trading #85
 
i thought you were referring to Brandon Lloyd, no way Chad Johnson ends up in D.C.

WaldSkins 10-25-2007 03:14 PM

Re: Trading #85
 
we have enoguh receivers.... the combo of moss, randel el, cooley, and thrash is suffiecient... we need oline help.......

DEVIL'S OWN 10-25-2007 03:15 PM

Re: Trading #85
 
no doubt, he's better than any receiver we could draft or have now.....if you put him on the other side of ARE or Moss, then they will be great #2's, i'd be for give a 3rd up for him......and Brandon Lloyd

hagams 10-25-2007 03:15 PM

Re: Trading #85
 
I don't think I would warm to the idea of Ocho Cinco playing for us. I like him, he's a damn good WR and puts up great numbers, but that's a distraction that isn't needed on a team trying to identify it's self. We all know we have a team that capable of winning, were just not clicking yet. Bringing in more big names isn't going to do anything special for us, just ask Dan Snyder.

freddyg12 10-25-2007 03:15 PM

Re: Trading #85
 
oh sh...
My BAD!

I was thinking of #84. Disregard prior post.
you should've said - ocho cinco (sp?)

NO!

WaldSkins 10-25-2007 03:18 PM

Re: Trading #85
 
i still say we are good enough at reciever.

GhettoDogAllStars 10-25-2007 03:24 PM

Re: Trading #85
 
Chad Johnson is great, and has one of the best work ethics of any receiver in the game. I would love to have him here. That said, he won't come cheap. There's NO WAY he's traded for anything less than a 1st round pick, and probably more. If we didn't have so many other issues to address, I wouldn't mind trading a 1st for him.

Is there a source for this info?

TheMalcolmConnection 10-25-2007 03:25 PM

Re: Trading #85
 
Not to say he wouldn't be a GREAT addition, but seriously, let's try to work with the draft some. Let's look at a young WR in the second or third rounds and see how that works out.

saden1 10-25-2007 03:28 PM

Re: Trading #85
 
This has got to be a joke. No way they trade Chad Johnson and if they do it'll be for at least 2 first round picks not for some scrubs.

TheBigD 10-25-2007 03:38 PM

Re: Trading #85
 
[quote=saden1;368888]This has got to be a joke. No way they trade Chad Johnson and if they do it'll be for at least 2 first round picks not for some scrubs.[/quote]
WHAT! 2 first round picks, who is this Ocho Cinco you speak of? He is a good player, no doubt, but no reciever would be traded for 2 first round picks.

Joe Ribbs BBQ 10-25-2007 03:38 PM

Re: Trading #85
 
I also heard about Ocho Cinco being dealt away, I think it was on either Rotoworld.com or Profootballtalk.com


[url=http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&id=2544]Chad Johnson : Rotoworld.com - Chad Johnson Biography from Rotoworld.com[/url]

read the days of 10/23 and 10/22

DEVIL'S OWN 10-25-2007 03:39 PM

Re: Trading #85
 
[QUOTE=saden1;368888]This has got to be a joke. No way they trade Chad Johnson and if they do it'll be for at least 2 first round picks not for some scrubs.[/QUOTE]


didnt they get rid of the best WR in the NFL now, for a 4th round pick...(Raiders) no way it cost 2 first rounders.......please, when the organization and coach say the consider, its the best offer.......not what they want, but the best they can get...

GhettoDogAllStars 10-25-2007 03:41 PM

Re: Trading #85
 
[QUOTE=DEVIL'S OWN;368897]didnt they get rid of the best WR in the NFL now, for a 4th round pick...(Raiders) no way it cost 2 first rounders.......please, when the organization and coach say the consider, its the best offer.......not what they want, but the best they can get...[/QUOTE]

So you're saying if the best they can get is a 6th rounder they would take it? No. They wouldn't.

Also, Moss was largely considered to be past his prime, plus a malcontent, and a lot of his success was credited to working with Culpepper and Carter. Obviously that's not the case, but perception is everything.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 2.10194 seconds with 9 queries