Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Parking Lot (http://www.thewarpath.net/parking-lot/)
-   -   A funny anti-kerry image [Dems need not click] (http://www.thewarpath.net/parking-lot/2209-funny-anti-kerry-image-dems-need.html)

Sammy Baugh Fan 08-11-2004 08:09 PM

A funny anti-kerry image [Dems need not click]

But how do people really think?

peace and....VOTE!!!!

Daseal 08-11-2004 08:38 PM

What exactly has bush done to make you such a die hard fan? Halliburton employee?

That Guy 08-11-2004 09:15 PM

he hasn't posted pro-bush stuff that i can recall... just anti-kerry stuff... not quite the same thing, but usually there's a corelation ;)

Sammy Baugh Fan 08-12-2004 09:01 PM

Here's a good link for those who think Mr. Kerry is a war hero who all around him support.

Also check out this link

Just FYI

Make sure everyone votes!

illdefined 08-13-2004 02:04 AM

Kerry's four months in the line of fire is better than Bush's no months. unless you count the time he was in uniform on the carrier with the sign that said 'Mission Accomplished'. yawn.

MTK 08-13-2004 08:14 AM


That Guy 08-13-2004 11:50 AM

I personally don't think either one should bother talking about or discrediting each others military service, neither one has a shiny happy record, and the little service they did do was ages upon ages ago... kerry probably didn't deserve his purple hearts, bush got out of going, whatever, what they did when they were 20 isn't really as relevant as what they've done more recently.

but once again, this crap is completely utterly boring...

Sammy Baugh Fan 08-13-2004 01:20 PM

Oh come on guys!
Well, is this funny?

This one I know is funny.

It's funny and it's not hurting anyone.
Have a great day guys!


Daseal 08-13-2004 05:51 PM

The mess if a democrat wins. The 900+ dead soldiers and constant state of fear we currently live in just warms me to think about...

That Guy 08-13-2004 06:22 PM

and you think the dems aren't going to use that fear? or are they just going to make it magically disappear? ;)

the towers happened before iraq... and no major US civilian loses have occurred since then...

not trying to be a dick, sorry...

SKINSnCANES 08-14-2004 12:37 AM

Democrats talk about how we should be at war and stuff, and their record shows it. Wheter you like Bush or Kerry, you cant argue taht bush actucally took action when we were attacted. What did clinton do when the trade center was attacked the first time, or the embassies that were bombed, or the laundry list of other terrosist acts that he let go unanwsered with no consequence. Now mabye you think that no action is the best action. But if you are worried about terrorists then you might want to consider picking bush since he'll actually do somethign about it.

Now Bush has plenty of other things that arent so hot, but you guys were talking about fear and stuff so i thought id share that.

Daseal 08-14-2004 10:52 AM

I guess you don't consider Iraqi's citizens. We killed 2300 Iraqi Civilians during just the air raids on Iraq. The US rarely losses citizens because we almost always bring the war to them. [url]http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/appendix/death.html[/url]

[url]http://www.iraqbodycount.net/[/url] -- That includes things such as suidice bombers, because they say if (in Jon Stewart's words) the coallision forces made up of the US and a crazy Australian with a bowie knife, weren't there the bombers also wouldn't be there, which I can agree with. These numbers are alarming, and guess what. It's a hell of a lot more civilians than we lost, and we wonder why they want us to go home!

Skins - Consider picking Bush because when a rogue band of terrorists attacks our homeland he goes rushing into Iraq shown to have absolutely no affilliation with Al-Quada (sp?). He's not doing anything about it, he's using the World Trade Center to promote his own agenda. I love how before the war (which I opposed from the begining) everyone talked about WMD's, and how many terrorists we could bag. Now all they can say is what a bad guy Saddam is. Yeah, he was a bad guy, but I think we have more important things than taking out dictators. Either that or we have a long list to go. We won't touch Kim Jong Il and he was and is much more of a threat than Iraq.

love them hogs 08-14-2004 12:04 PM

Hey daseal if you remeber correctly we went into Afganastan first after the towers went down and not Iraq.We invaded Iraq because we already had our forces in the region.

Now about the WMDs when we first went into Iraq there wasnt a single usable water truck in the country because they were contaminated with jet fuel wich is commnoly used to hide the presence of chemical weapons.

I dont know about the rest of you but I dont live in fear and I grew up ten minutes away from the pentagon.I think Bush did the right thing invading Iraq and afganastan.Im tired of people thinking that You can stop terrorist by non violent actions.THe terrorists only demand is that we die and talking to them isnt going to change that.They only respect violence and if that is what they want then that is what they should get.

EEich 08-14-2004 12:13 PM

I realize that this is the Parking Lot... but I think you can only make enemies by discussing politics, race and religion here.

love them hogs 08-14-2004 12:15 PM

p.s. The number of Iraqi civillians we killed is nothing compared to the number of Iraqis that saddam killed so you do the math.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.05404 seconds with 8 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25