![]() |
Question 3: ExtremeSkins Version
Some of you guys won't get the inside joke at all, here's some back up info ([url=http://www.redskinswarpath.com/parking-lot/5430-question-3-i-asked-gibbs.html]Question 3[/url] (good luck!)
For the rest of us, does it seem like ES suddenly has their own version of Q3? Copycats! [url=http://extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=236412]EXTREMESKINS.com - Did NO one hear me on Redskins Radio?[/url] |
Re: Question 3: ExtremeSkins Version
haha nice.
Someone seriously figure out question 3 or we will never win a super bowl. |
Re: Question 3: ExtremeSkins Version
That's pretty damn close to the retarded level of ?3, but in the end it's just a cheap ripoff wannabe.
|
Re: Question 3: ExtremeSkins Version
Did we ever figure out what question 3 actually was? I just remember going round and round with that guy.
|
Re: Question 3: ExtremeSkins Version
Yeah Cpayne posted the answer (well, the question I guess) but I think we all glossed over it. It's more fun not knowing the answer (or question)
|
Re: Question 3: ExtremeSkins Version
Ah, laaame!
|
Re: Question 3: ExtremeSkins Version
[quote=SmootSmack;416078]Some of you guys won't get the inside joke at all, here's some back up info ([URL="http://www.redskinswarpath.com/parking-lot/5430-question-3-i-asked-gibbs.html"]Question 3[/URL] (good luck!)
For the rest of us, does it seem like ES suddenly has their own version of Q3? Copycats! [URL="http://extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=236412"]EXTREMESKINS.com - Did NO one hear me on Redskins Radio?[/URL][/quote] It must have really irked him that he had to ask if anyone heard him. LOL |
Re: Question 3: ExtremeSkins Version
since the warpath holds a trademark on ?3, i feel a lawsuit is in order. and someone from over there must be nosing around over here. for that is a blatant rip off
|
Re: Question 3: ExtremeSkins Version
Isn't the answer to the question is 42.
|
Re: Question 3: ExtremeSkins Version
Since I've been here I never understood the whole Question 3 joke but since I actually started to read it...the first 3 pages had me laughing out loud because I read it as if a conversation was constantly going on. The confusion over the smallest thing was so funny to me. You guys are crazy man ! Reminds me of something me and my boys would sit and laugh about after a "meditation" session !
|
Re: Question 3: ExtremeSkins Version
[QUOTE=saden1;416112]Isn't the answer to the question is 42.[/QUOTE]Only if you're hitchhiking.
I brought this up last offseason but it was ignored: [I]how does Smoot's return the Redskins affect ?3?[/I] |
Re: Question 3: ExtremeSkins Version
I like vague things...
|
Re: Question 3: ExtremeSkins Version
[QUOTE=SmootSmack;416089]Yeah Cpayne posted the answer (well, the question I guess) but I think we all glossed over it. It's more fun not knowing the answer (or question)[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I actually posted the *audio* from that glorious event in Redskins history. |
Re: Question 3: ExtremeSkins Version
I went back through and read a few pages of the question 3 thread. That was the funniest thing I had ever read in my entire life! It seemed like the thread went about six pages before we all finally understood what the question AND answer was. I haven't seen WeWhite since then however...LOL!
|
Re: Question 3: ExtremeSkins Version
that's too funny...
i actually heard him on redskins radio... I have to say he wasn't all that bad. Some of the things he said about the fans reasoning behind backing coaching candidates made us sound like mornons, but it wasn' any worse than half the garbage Larry and Bram talk about. I really dislike larry michaels. Bram is a little annoying, but he's alright. LM just always comes across as a complete Dbag to me. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.