The Case For...
 

Ok, so the point of this thread is for you to pick one player, and ONLY one player and state your case for why the Redskins should add this player to the roster for 2009.

Remember only one player. It can be a free agent, a draft pick, or someone likely to be on the trading block, such as Anquan Boldin. Remember, if you pick someone like Boldin you need to make your case for why he's worth giving up multiple picks when we have a limited amount as is.

I don't know who I'd pick, so I'll state my case later.

Re: The Case For...
 

Any of the big four offensive tackles available in the draft. The OL is old and needs more beef. A pick like that will extend Portis's useful life and aid Campbell's development, he'd make a big impact for years.

Re: The Case For...
 

Albert Haynesworth.

A dominant DT like this dramatically improves your entire defense. Dont think so? See Ngata in Baltimore, Williams(s) in Minn, Jenkins in NY, Stroud in Buffalo, Wilfork in New England...the list goes on.

A massive two gap tackle can free up your ends to rush the passer or push the pocket himself. This is less time your corners have to cover and also subjects the secondary to more plays on rushed, errant throws. In the run game he can play 2 gap and allow your linebackers to make more plays.

Re: The Case For...
 

Wow, only one? This isn't going to be easy. I think that Alex Mack is the most realistic and best choice.

Upside

One: He's the best center available.

Two: We can trade down to get him and get other picks.

Three: He can play other positions.

Four: We will not wonder who's going to be our Center for the next few years.

Five: When was the last time we drafted a Center?

Six: If we pick him up later in the draft we'll not have to pay him as much as a 13th pick.

Seven: If he does become a solid center other teams will want to trade picks for him not vice versa.

Downside

One: He might be a washout. I don't think so, but maybe.

Two: It might take him a year or two to get some playing time.

:headbange

Re: The Case For...
 

We obviously need more than one player but if I could only pick one........Alex Mack.
He would make our line better almost instantly because he could start as a rookie.
He can play center or guard. If Rabach stays as our starting center, Mack could play guard at a high level until he's needed to replace Rabach.
The middle of our line becomes stronger and we can run up the middle and JC has a pocket to step up into.
As Tramp stated, we could trade down, gain a pick and still get our man.
He's been compared to Matt Birk and should be able to anchor this line at a high level for many years.
I believe we can get a starting RT with a lower pick. The top four are not the only good prospects.
The OT's are rising and falling and there is no concensus no.1. Many reports have Mack as the best center prospect in many years.
The man is huge and the closest thing I've seen to a HOG since the originals.
And lastly.....Buges would LOVE this guy and he deserves a guy like this to coach!

Re: The Case For...
 

Easy...Lechler. The Redskins kicking game has been a mess for the last 15 years and this move will fix the punting game for the next decade. No other single move that we can make is gaurenteed to fix a problem. If we get Boldin maybe that still doesn't work if the QB & OL don't get it done. Haynesworth is a position we need but maybe he gets lazy once his bank account is filled. However, Lechler will fix our punting problem without a doubt so he's my choice.

Re: The Case For...
 

I'll be honest I really can't pick one. My only concern is picking someone from the draft because it seems the Skins have issues with playing anyone who is a Rookie. Heyer got in due to injuries. It seems they don't have a problem with defensive rookies though. Atleast for the most part.

Re: The Case For...
 

[quote=53Fan;527007]We obviously need more than one player but if I could only pick one........Alex Mack.
He would make our line better almost instantly because he could start as a rookie.
He can play center or guard. If Rabach stays as our starting center, Mack could play guard at a high level until he's needed to replace Rabach.
The middle of our line becomes stronger and we can run up the middle and JC has a pocket to step up into.
As Tramp stated, we could trade down, gain a pick and still get our man.
He's been compared to Matt Birk and should be able to anchor this line at a high level for many years.
I believe we can get a starting RT with a lower pick. The top four are not the only good prospects.
The OT's are rising and falling and there is no concensus no.1. Many reports have Mack as the best center prospect in many years.
The man is huge and the closest thing I've seen to a HOG since the originals.
And lastly.....Buges would LOVE this guy and he deserves a guy like this to coach![/quote]

100% agreed!! For the few picks that we have he would be the anchor, QB of the line. I don't care that you don't draft a C/G till the 2nd or 3rd pick, I think this guy is special and I would make an exemption.

Re: The Case For...
 

So the consensus is a punter and a couple of guys who have never played a down in the NFL.

Re: The Case For...
 

Eugene Monroe - Virginia - Offensive Tackle

Re: The Case For...
 

If I was going to throw money at one big FA it would be Karlos Dansby. He can do it all at LB and I think he's just hitting his stride as a big time player.

Re: The Case For...
 

A good 4-3 linebacker that is proven in the pros. Dansby or Scott.

Re: The Case For...
 

[quote=Mattyk72;527013]If I was going to throw money at one big FA it would be Karlos Dansby.* He can do it all at LB and I think he's just hitting his stride as a big time player.[/quote]Matty he would be awsome but he's got a franchise tag waiting for him Im sure. Would you still be interested if that was the case?

Re: The Case For...
 

[quote=44ever;527020]Matty he would be awsome but he's got a franchise tag waiting for him Im sure. Would you still be interested if that was the case?[/quote]

If he's franchised, definitely not.

Re: The Case For...
 

No doubt, a dominant OT in the draft. Every team I can remember that drafted an OT in the first round in the last few years improved the next season.