Warpath

Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Redskins Locker Room (http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-locker-room/)
-   -   Brandon or T.O. ? (http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-locker-room/35846-brandon-or-t-o.html)

SOUL-SKINS 03-26-2010 11:56 AM

Brandon or T.O. ?
 
This is just speculation at this point but very interesting. Obvisouly Brandon Marshall is the better option but he comes with a huge price tag. We will instantly have a true #1 receiver.........and then there is TO. I dunno. I think we would give up way to much for Marshall.

[url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/free-agency/shanahan-interested-in-terrell.html#more]Redskins Insider - Shanahan interested in Terrell Owens or Brandon Marshall?[/url]

freddyg12 03-26-2010 12:03 PM

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 
IF we must, Marshal w/out a doubt!

Longtimefan 03-26-2010 12:04 PM

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 
Marshall would vastly improve the receiver corps and would be a good addition. He's tendered at one and I doubt we'd trade our number one for him. Depending on how bad they want him, something could be worked out.

I would say no to TO under any circumstance.

BigHairedAristocrat 03-26-2010 12:07 PM

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 
I dont want either, but if we had to have one of them, i'd actually prefer T.O. to my knowledge, he was pretty much a model citizen and buffalo and the general lack of interest in him around the league should be humbling. the chance to play the cowboys and eagles 4 times a year should be extra motivation for him. obviously, marshall is younger and has more long-term potential, but he's also just as much of a knucklehead as T.O. The advantage with T.O. is that he'd be cheaper and wouldnt cost us any draft picks.

Skinny Tee 03-26-2010 12:28 PM

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 
[quote=freddyg12;678773]IF we must, Marshal w/out a doubt![/quote]

Id rather have TO.

He's a free agent and wouldn't cost us our most precious renewing resource that is our draft picks.

KLHJ2 03-26-2010 12:36 PM

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 
I dont think that WR is enough of a need for the FO to make a move for either guy. This whole speculation would seem completely bogus in my mind.

I say take neither and suffer the consequences for not playing along.

doughtydoubter 03-26-2010 12:39 PM

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 
[quote=Skinny Tee;678777]Id rather have TO.

He's a free agent and wouldn't cost us our most precious renewing resource that is our draft picks.[/quote]

good point

Zerohero 03-26-2010 12:41 PM

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 
As crazy as it sounds, TO would be cheap and amped to beat the Cowgirls and Eagles

Longtimefan 03-26-2010 12:49 PM

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 
[quote=Angry;678778]I dont think that WR is enough of a need for the FO to make a move for either guy. This whole speculation would seem completely bogus in my mind.

I say take neither and suffer the consequences for not playing along.[/quote]

We don't have much by way of a proven commodity except for Moss. I could see it being a concern, but to what extent they choose to act on it is a completely different story......TO is looking to improve on 6 mil. and I doubt that's going to happen here.

steveo395 03-26-2010 12:51 PM

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 
Do not sign either of them. We are trying to build a team for the long term. T.O. is too old, but that is actually the least of his problems. We would have to give up too much to get Marshall and he has character problems too.

We need to build from the inside out. If we trade for Marshall, we will have no o-line, which is much more important. Plus, we need to give Thomas and Kelly a shot.

Mattyk 03-26-2010 12:51 PM

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 
Neither.

McD5 03-26-2010 12:52 PM

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 
I would love to see us ship a player out, or some combination of a player and low round draft pick for Marshall.

A TE maybe? Landry? Anything like that would work.

KLHJ2 03-26-2010 12:59 PM

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 
[quote=Longtimefan;678782]We don't have much by way of a proven commodity except for Moss. I could see it being a concern, but to what extent they choose to act on it is a completely different story......TO is looking to improve on 6 mil. and I doubt that's going to happen here.[/quote]

Look, I don't care who we have playing WR. Once they get to that level (NFL) all of them can peform to a satisfactory level, all they have to do is catch the ball when they are thrown to. The guys we have will look like studs as soon as Campbell or whoever the QB is, is not throwing off of his right ass cheek anymore.

Lotus 03-26-2010 01:01 PM

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 
I cannot fathom the continuing talk about Brandon Marshall and the Redskins. Shanny wanted to ditch him in Denver. Therefore Shanny is not bringing him to Washington. End of story, it seems to me.

As for TO, I don't want him taking playing time from Thomas and Kelly.

Chico23231 03-26-2010 01:08 PM

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 
Marshall by far and away.....but Ill take neither at this point if it means giving away draft picks....We need to add a WR with ARE gone. At this point wait for more cuts, I really dont waste another pick on one...we have the youth, lets add a dependable vet for cheap.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.08389 seconds with 8 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25