![]() |
"Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block
[url=http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/04/10/pro-bowl-running-back-on-the-trading-block/]"Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block | ProFootballTalk.com[/url]
C.Johnson won't be traded for sure, but what about Frank Gore? Anyone think this could be another blockbuster trade? I say D.Williams is gone in Car |
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block
This could probably fit in the offseason rumor thread.
We already have 3 pro-bowl runningbacks so I doubt we are looking for another. It could very well be CP on the block. |
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block
Damn I didn't even think about the offseason thread lol
|
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block
CP wouldn't qualify as a blockbuster deal. No franchise is giving up much for him because of 1) age 2) contract 3) it PORTIS.
|
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block
[quote=The Goat;686712]CP wouldn't qualify as a blockbuster deal. No franchise is giving up much for him because of 1) age 2) contract 3) it PORTIS.[/quote]
he's not that old. |
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block
my guess is it's either Portis or Lynch because there are new coaches at those teams. It could be Williams in CAR also because they don't have many draft picks and John Fox seems to be on the hot seat
|
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block
I would assume the guy from the pat or delangelo williams. I know there was a rumor after the season ended that Deangelo wasn't going to be back to CAr and they wanted to trade him.
|
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block
[quote=artmonkforhallofamein07;686752]I would assume the guy from the pat or delangelo williams. I know there was a rumor after the season ended that Deangelo wasn't going to be back to CAr and they wanted to trade him.[/quote]
I think you may be right. Jonathan Stewart is still busting off 50 yard runs in the Meadowlands... Deangelo has talent and will help out whatever team he ends up with. |
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block
Lynch is definitely on the trading block. Would be surprised to see him still a Bill by April 30
CP, Ronnie Brown, and Laurence Maroney could all also be gone for the right price but I don't believe they're actively on the trade block |
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block
i dont see why anyone would give up anything for portis or maroney. they're both obviously on the decline and running backs are a dime a dozen.
|
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block
It's Lynch.
Ronnie Brown MAYBE...but doubtful. DeAngelo Williams maybe while he's still worth something. If we consider Willis McGahee a PB RB, he'll be moved most likely, Ray Rice is their man now. |
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block
Who would trade for Portis. What franchise is that desperate? The Raiders? He's got nothing left, so i know it isnt him...
|
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block
[quote=SolidSnake84;687032]Who would trade for Portis. What franchise is that desperate? The Raiders? He's got nothing left, so i know it isnt him...[/quote]
You're right. Look at Marion Barber...only 26 but beaten down like Portis, yet is in a RRBC now and they can't get more than a 5th for him. They just extended him because they can't trade him. |
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block
No more free agent RBs...lets focus on O-line
|
Re: "Pro Bowl running back" on the trading block
[quote=BigHairedAristocrat;686973]i dont see why anyone would give up anything for portis or maroney. they're both obviously on the decline and running backs are a dime a dozen.[/quote]Unlike Portis, Maroney has very low mileage. He has had nagging injuries his first 3 years in the league, so he is a risk, but Maroney has far fewer carries than Portis had at a similar stage in his career.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.