Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Would You Rather... (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=38784)

WaldSkins 09-26-2010 07:32 PM

Would You Rather...
 
Pretty simple question: Would you rather take a team with Blache and Campbell or Haslett and McNabb?

As much as I like the addition of Mcnabb to this team, I cant remember a time when the defense was this bad. So which would you rather have?

rypper11 09-26-2010 07:34 PM

Re: Would You Rather...
 
Why not McNabb/Shanny but with Blache? I know people didn't like his "boring" defenses, but they didn't look this bad week after week.

DynamiteRave 09-26-2010 07:35 PM

Re: Would You Rather...
 
I'd really almost prefer Zorn and McNabb at this rate. Sigh.

WaldSkins 09-26-2010 07:36 PM

Re: Would You Rather...
 
[quote=DynamiteRave;739633]I'd really almost prefer Zorn and McNabb at this rate. Sigh.[/quote]

HA, that really wasnt a option.

Bushead 09-26-2010 07:36 PM

Re: Would You Rather...
 
I think the switch will be really beneficial over time, but it will also take time to get there.

DynamiteRave 09-26-2010 07:38 PM

Re: Would You Rather...
 
[quote=WaldSkins;739639]HA, that really wasnt a option.[/quote]

Then Haslett/McNabb. McNabb at least puts us in a position to win. JC is doing in Oak what he should've been doing here. Riding the pine.

Chico23231 09-26-2010 07:39 PM

Re: Would You Rather...
 
[quote=WaldSkins;739621]Pretty simple question: Would you rather take a team with Zorn and Campbell or Haslett and McNabb?

As much as I like the addition of Mcnabb to this team, I cant remember a time when the defense was this bad. So which would you rather have?[/quote]

K, its not that bad. Zorn and Campbell was pretty f*cking bad. Ill take McNabb and Haslett

diehard 09-26-2010 07:43 PM

Re: Would You Rather...
 
Good question. McNabb and Kyle are definite upgrades. What Mike, Kyle, and Jim need to realize is that what was successful for other teams isn't a determination to totally scrap what we already do well. Let's see more power running, working some stretch plays in. Need I mention the defense? You can play more aggressively (exotic blitzes) while preserving the 4-3 schemes.

chewman 09-26-2010 07:44 PM

Re: Would You Rather...
 
doesn't matter what combo you take we would still suck

Chico23231 09-26-2010 07:46 PM

Re: Would You Rather...
 
[quote=chewman;739666]doesn't matter what combo you take we would still suck[/quote]

+100

SouperMeister 09-26-2010 07:48 PM

Re: Would You Rather...
 
Go back to a 4-3 which fits our personnel. We have the best 3-technique lineman in the league. Somewhere, Greg Blache is laughing his ass off.

GMScud 09-26-2010 07:50 PM

Re: Would You Rather...
 
Haslett and McNabb for sure, but on the condition that Shanahan gets Haslett to stop effing around with this BS defense.

Ruhskins 09-26-2010 08:11 PM

Re: Would You Rather...
 
[quote=GMScud;739680]Haslett and McNabb for sure, but on the condition that Shanahan gets Haslett to stop effing around with this BS defense.[/quote]

I'd rather have J. Gray or Mike Zimmer along with a 4-3 defense along with McNabb.

SFREDSKIN 09-26-2010 08:13 PM

Re: Would You Rather...
 
[quote=Ruhskins;739721]I'd rather have Jim Gray or Mike Zimmer along with a 4-3 defense along with McNabb.[/quote]

Did you mean Jerry Gray? Who they should have promoted to DC.

WaldSkins 09-26-2010 08:17 PM

Re: Would You Rather...
 
[quote=Chico23231;739652]K, its not that bad. Zorn and Campbell was pretty f*cking bad. Ill take McNabb and Haslett[/quote]

Blache and Campbell's first 3 games were 2-1.

Haslett and McNabbs's first 3 games are 1-2.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.14474 seconds with 9 queries