![]() |
Would You Rather...
Pretty simple question: Would you rather take a team with Blache and Campbell or Haslett and McNabb?
As much as I like the addition of Mcnabb to this team, I cant remember a time when the defense was this bad. So which would you rather have? |
Re: Would You Rather...
Why not McNabb/Shanny but with Blache? I know people didn't like his "boring" defenses, but they didn't look this bad week after week.
|
Re: Would You Rather...
I'd really almost prefer Zorn and McNabb at this rate. Sigh.
|
Re: Would You Rather...
[quote=DynamiteRave;739633]I'd really almost prefer Zorn and McNabb at this rate. Sigh.[/quote]
HA, that really wasnt a option. |
Re: Would You Rather...
I think the switch will be really beneficial over time, but it will also take time to get there.
|
Re: Would You Rather...
[quote=WaldSkins;739639]HA, that really wasnt a option.[/quote]
Then Haslett/McNabb. McNabb at least puts us in a position to win. JC is doing in Oak what he should've been doing here. Riding the pine. |
Re: Would You Rather...
[quote=WaldSkins;739621]Pretty simple question: Would you rather take a team with Zorn and Campbell or Haslett and McNabb?
As much as I like the addition of Mcnabb to this team, I cant remember a time when the defense was this bad. So which would you rather have?[/quote] K, its not that bad. Zorn and Campbell was pretty f*cking bad. Ill take McNabb and Haslett |
Re: Would You Rather...
Good question. McNabb and Kyle are definite upgrades. What Mike, Kyle, and Jim need to realize is that what was successful for other teams isn't a determination to totally scrap what we already do well. Let's see more power running, working some stretch plays in. Need I mention the defense? You can play more aggressively (exotic blitzes) while preserving the 4-3 schemes.
|
Re: Would You Rather...
doesn't matter what combo you take we would still suck
|
Re: Would You Rather...
[quote=chewman;739666]doesn't matter what combo you take we would still suck[/quote]
+100 |
Re: Would You Rather...
Go back to a 4-3 which fits our personnel. We have the best 3-technique lineman in the league. Somewhere, Greg Blache is laughing his ass off.
|
Re: Would You Rather...
Haslett and McNabb for sure, but on the condition that Shanahan gets Haslett to stop effing around with this BS defense.
|
Re: Would You Rather...
[quote=GMScud;739680]Haslett and McNabb for sure, but on the condition that Shanahan gets Haslett to stop effing around with this BS defense.[/quote]
I'd rather have J. Gray or Mike Zimmer along with a 4-3 defense along with McNabb. |
Re: Would You Rather...
[quote=Ruhskins;739721]I'd rather have Jim Gray or Mike Zimmer along with a 4-3 defense along with McNabb.[/quote]
Did you mean Jerry Gray? Who they should have promoted to DC. |
Re: Would You Rather...
[quote=Chico23231;739652]K, its not that bad. Zorn and Campbell was pretty f*cking bad. Ill take McNabb and Haslett[/quote]
Blache and Campbell's first 3 games were 2-1. Haslett and McNabbs's first 3 games are 1-2. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.