Skins-Vikes Post game good & bad
 

The good:

RGIII looked healthy and made a few awesome plays, I thought. Great throws to DJax, nice runs, excellent throws to Helu.

Helu has been great all year, but for the punt block whiff.

DJax. Wow.

Morris.

The Bad: RGIII had a few boneheaded plays and few bad throws. (What kind of gets me though is that the team EXPECTS him to win it for us, while they go out and try hard to win it when KC/Colt play, because they don't expect those guys to win it on their own.)

Safety. Obviously.

Weak pass rush in crucial situations.

Red zone run d (!!)


The Ugly: Bus crashes, protests and locker room reporting.

Re: Skins-Vikes Post game good & bad
 

Good:
- RG3's seems healthy and made some good plays
- Morris' was effective
- DJax continues to be effective

Bad:
- Offense lack of points in the first half
- Defense shitting the bed in the second half

I still think it was a good idea to start RG3. No point in keeping him benched IMO.

Re: Skins-Vikes Post game good & bad
 

I missed the whole safety thing.. What happened there?

Re: Skins-Vikes Post game good & bad
 

Good:
RGIII's positive effect on the run game;
RGIII's deep throws;
Tres Way;
Offense's 4th Quarter response to Minn's FIRST long TD drive.

Bad:
Defense's 2nd half collapse - inability of players to execute schemes called;
Defense allowing TWO 70+ yard TD drives in the 4th quarter to a bad offense;
Hazlett for failing to adjust his D in 2nd half;
O-Line pass blocking (or occasional lack thereof);
RGIII holding the ball wayyyy too long on several occasions;
Did I mention Hazlett? Well, I am mentioning him again.

Re: Skins-Vikes Post game good & bad
 

[quote=Meks;1093115]I missed the whole safety thing.. What happened there?[/quote]

I think he meant "Safeties - we have none."

To me, got to top priority in the offseason. Get someone back there who can cover and support Amerson/Breeland.

Re: Skins-Vikes Post game good & bad
 

[quote=Meks;1093115]I missed the whole safety thing.. What happened there?[/quote]

Clark played horribly, even Gruden called him out during his presser.

Re: Skins-Vikes Post game good & bad
 

[quote=Ruhskins;1093118]Clark played horribly, even Gruden called him out during his presser.[/quote]


I didn't get a chance to listen to the presser, but I hope Jay Gruden did call out some people. Hope he's calling out some of the coaching as well.

Re: Skins-Vikes Post game good & bad
 

I didn't see the game, but I have read about it and seen some highlights. Sounds like our safeties were terrible, and that the D evaporated in the second half. Did Phillip Thomas play at all? If so, how did he look? Not saying that he's a solution necessarily, but it sounds like he couldn't do a lot worse than our starters did yesterday.

Looks like Kerrigan had a very quiet day. 3 tackles, no sacks, not sure if he had any QB pressures. Did the Vikes just decide that he was the guy to stop and had him doubled? If so, I know that Hatcher had one sack (as did Murphy), but did anyone on the D line play well? It seems like we have Hatcher, but no other real contributors up front. I hope we can get Cofield back healthy soon, and maybe the D line can show some improvement. The Vikings were ranked 29th in offense and put up 29 points on us. That's pathetic. No way that they should be able to score more points against us than Dallas, Seattle, or Houston (and only one less than Arizona).

Re: Skins-Vikes Post game good & bad
 

The Good:

Morris having a good showing.

DJax, good as usual.

Special teams did an alright job.

Breeland made a few plays here and there.

RG3.

The bad:

Defense collapsed the 2nd half of the game.

Haz is predictable and has no idea what it means to gameplan and adjust.

O-line seems to only be able to block properly (at least sometimes) for people not named RG3.

RG3.

Re: Skins-Vikes Post game good & bad
 

Ryan Clark is supposed to lead our defense through experience and communication. But we've had more blown coverages - "miscommunications" - than any time that I can remember. This has been true all season long.

Re: Skins-Vikes Post game good & bad
 

Yeah, safeties, not safety!

Skins-Vikes Post game good & bad
 

Good: almo - feel bad for him.
D-jax - feel bad for him.
Rg-3 at times.
Lack of penalties.
Tres Way. Great game.
Bad: Where the hell was reed, garcon , roberts? All the other playmakers
RG -3 at times
Wtf was with Roberts
And not calling fair catches?
Jim Ha...i cant even type his name. I get ill.
Oline is a hot mess. What else is new?

Re: Skins-Vikes Post game good & bad
 

3 blown leads, what else is there to say.

Re: Skins-Vikes Post game good & bad
 

I like Gruden, feel like he will figure it out as long as Snyder doesn't meddle too much.

Re: Skins-Vikes Post game good & bad
 

[quote=punch it in;1093128]<snip>Bad: Where the hell was reed, garcon , roberts?

<snip>Oline is a hot mess. What else is new?[/quote]


Reed didn't have a big impact because he was targeted once. And without even rewatching the game, I can pretty much guarantee that he was open just about evey time. Not his fault that RG didn't look his way.

As for the O-line, it's not a coincidence that Griffin makes his return and the line immediately looks worse. Him holding onto the ball so long isn't always bad, but it will make the line look worse occasionally.