Warpath

Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Parking Lot (http://www.thewarpath.net/parking-lot/)
-   -   Preliminary '06 ratings (http://www.thewarpath.net/parking-lot/6310-preliminary-06-ratings.html)

Mattyk 05-22-2005 10:10 PM

Preliminary '06 ratings
 
Skins D got totally robbed

[CODE] [b]Team[/b] [b]Overall[/b] [b]Offense[/b] [b]Defense[/b]
Patriots 97 92 96
Eagles 96 96 94
Steelers 91 89 92
Vikings 90 86 92
Colts 90 99 68
Chargers 88 90 79
Seahawks 86 89 84
Ravens 86 85 90
Panthers 86 87 92
Chiefs 85 91 77
Bengals 85 85 76
Falcons 85 80 87
Jaguars 84 83 86
Texans 83 84 83
Rams 82 90 69
Jets 81 86 76
Raiders 81 88 65
Packers 80 92 63
Cardinals 78 78 79
Bills 78 70 95
Lions 78 87 74
[color=DarkRed] Redskins 77 82 74[/color]
Buccaneers 75 76 83
Broncos 74 73 80
Bears 73 70 76
Cowboys 73 72 79
Saints 72 83 66
Giants 72 68 75
Dolphins 70 68 79
Titans 69 76 66
49ers 67 70 68
Browns 61 62 60 [/CODE]

wolfeskins 05-22-2005 10:16 PM

Re: Preliminary '06 ratings
 
just look at the skins d and the vikes d.... thats a bunch of bullsh*t.

wolfeskins 05-22-2005 10:19 PM

Re: Preliminary '06 ratings
 
the skins offense got a higher number then thier defense.:Smoker:

Mattyk 05-22-2005 10:19 PM

Re: Preliminary '06 ratings
 
The D-line must kill the overall D rating, what else could it be??

Gmanc711 05-22-2005 10:25 PM

Re: Preliminary '06 ratings
 
WOW! Thats downright horrible. How our offense got a better rating than our D is beyond me. The D line isnt super, but they shouldnt bring down the rating that much; especially with Griffin keepin a higher number. Who knows

Sheriff Gonna Getcha 05-22-2005 11:56 PM

Re: Preliminary '06 ratings
 
The Chiefs have a better D rating! That's ridiculous

That Guy 05-23-2005 01:09 AM

Re: Preliminary '06 ratings
 
the bills have a 95 and we have a 74? WTF...

Mattyk 05-23-2005 08:53 AM

Re: Preliminary '06 ratings
 
I'm not sure how they get these overall ratings, but at least we know the Skins D will be stacked with guys like Arrington, Washington, Taylor, Griffin, Springs, etc. Rogers should be rated pretty well as a rookie, so at least there will be plenty of playmakers on this defense.

TheMalcolmConnection 05-23-2005 08:56 AM

Re: Preliminary '06 ratings
 
Just like I said in another post, these guys basically go with what they see on paper (even though them giving us such a horrible ranking for D is baffling). It's like they plug it into a computer. I mean how else would they get numbers for these type of things?

Redskins_P 05-23-2005 10:04 AM

Re: Preliminary '06 ratings
 
Thats some bullshit.

joecrisp 05-23-2005 05:13 PM

Re: Preliminary '06 ratings
 
The Madden guys are obviously putting a lot of stock into the free agency additions/losses.

I guess from an outsider's standpoint, the losses of Smoot and Pierce would presumably have a devastating effect on the Skins' defense (or at least their Madden equivalent), especially when the D-line wasn't upgraded at all.

On the other hand, the Vikings and Chiefs made several splashy free agency additions to their defenses, so you would expect their ratings to go up...


Personally, I've been modifying the league rosters on Madden 2005 ever since free agency started, creating draftees, and altering the players' attributes to more accurately reflect (at least in my mind) the players' real-life abilities. I think my version of the Skins' defense will be rated a little bit higher than 74. :biggthump

I always like to do that in the offseason to see how my projected team and player ratings compare to the ratings in the new game when it comes out. Yeah, I know, it's totally geeky-- but I get pretty damned bored in the offseason. :)

skinsfanthru&thru 05-23-2005 11:55 PM

Re: Preliminary '06 ratings
 
[QUOTE=joecrisp]Personally, I've been modifying the league rosters on Madden 2005 ever since free agency started, creating draftees, and altering the players' attributes to more accurately reflect (at least in my mind) the players' real-life abilities. I think my version of the Skins' defense will be rated a little bit higher than 74. :biggthump

I always like to do that in the offseason to see how my projected team and player ratings compare to the ratings in the new game when it comes out. Yeah, I know, it's totally geeky-- but I get pretty damned bored in the offseason. :)[/QUOTE]

I 2 do this cuz even though we are a bit biased, there's no way some of our players (especially on the defense) should have such low stats and rankings. Plus there should be some way for them to put into atleast the first season the fact that the club (minus a couple free agent losses) is bringing back last years #3 defense without one of its bigtime players playing much last year.

and there's no way the offense should be at 82 or whatever it is. It should be no higher than 76.

FRPLG 05-29-2005 12:07 PM

Re: Preliminary '06 ratings
 
That is some crazy shit. How is it that we're now the new Cowboys and everyone loves to hate on us?

wolfeskins 05-29-2005 01:25 PM

Re: Preliminary '06 ratings
 
almost every media person who speaks of the skins offense says that the skins have not really improved their offense with the offseason additions, with the exception of casey rabach and the return of jansen. yet the offense get rated higher than the #1 defense in the nfc last year. a defense that lost only a #2 cb and a mlb that has been the starter for only 1 year.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.09922 seconds with 8 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25