![]() |
#82 Ben Sinnott
What's the deal with him ? He's a 2nd round draft choice and he's far behind Chris Cooley (3rd round pick) was twenty years ago......
|
Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
Hopefully just learning behind Ertz. Can’t expect every high round rookie to get it right away. Jury still out imo.
|
Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
I think it's mainly because Ertz has been the primary guy at te and Sinnott needs more experience. He may see the field a lot Sunday with Ertz may be out. No doubt about it though, Sinnott is talented and has potential through the roof.
|
Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
I am definitely hoping he steps up if Ertz is out. I think the coaching staff has chosen the slow path for any rookies not in a position of dire need (ie qb and cb). This week should see more production out of Sinnott
Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk |
Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
TE's are traditionally slow starters. I'm not reading too much into it yet. But yeah, if Ertz is out, ideally he steps up.
|
Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
Sinnot wasn't going to come in here and start over Ertz. He wasn't even going to win time from Bates who is a very good blocking TE.
|
Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
I feel like we have the same discussion every year.
Not everybody is going to come in their rookie season and become a key contributor. Some guys take time to develop. Let's revisit this discussion next year once he has a year under his belt. |
Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
[quote=mooby;1369334]I feel like we have the same discussion every year.
Not everybody is going to come in their rookie season and become a key contributor. Some guys take time to develop. Let's revisit this discussion next year once he has a year under his belt.[/quote] Yeah and every year fans write off guys way too early. A little odd to see so much consternation about rookies on a team that's 9-5 and heading towards the playoffs. Especially when we have the rookie of the year at QB. |
Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
guy needs to be on a gallon of milk
|
Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
While I’m not worrying B.S., John Bates seems to be playing well enough to cover Ertz in any absence
|
Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
[quote=Chico23231;1369339]While I’m not worrying B.S., John Bates seems to be playing well enough to cover Ertz in any absence[/quote]I like Bates and his blocking especially, but Sinnott has wheels and can be a real weapon. I would not be surprised if he has makes some plays Sunday. Really want him to get a real chance now with Ertz potential status.
|
Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
[quote=AnonEmouse;1369331]TE's are traditionally slow starters. I'm not reading too much into it yet. But yeah, if Ertz is out, ideally he steps up.[/quote]
I agree.....he's been too limited.....I blame this on the coaches.... |
Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
Zach Ertz has been playing well. There hasn't been a reason to play Ben more than they have to this point. I think Zach is ranked #9 in the league for Tight Ends in receptions.
If Zach is out, this will likely be a big opportunity for Ben. I'm confident he'll step up if that's the case. Eventually, he'll have his 'break out' game, and his draft position will be validated. |
Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
[quote=Chief X_Phackter;1369368]Zach Ertz has been playing well.[/quote]He has played pretty well this year but has had more drops at a position that should have your best hands. Sinnott is faster and much younger. I wanna see what he can do now with this opportunity. Hope he plays some and JD targets him.
|
Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
[quote=WCommandersfan99;1369369]He has played pretty well this year but has had more drops at a position that should have your best hands. Sinnott is faster and much younger. I wanna see what he can do now with this opportunity. Hope he plays some and JD targets him.[/quote]
If Sinnott gers more than give targets I'll be satisfied with that..... they need to start involving him more in the offense....... |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.