why not cut nemo?
 

im glad to see brown go, i dont think he will make an impact anywhere else. trackstars are a dime a dozen...

but we only had 4 WR's now and jacobs cant get on the field so basicly we have 3 for mondays game.
does anyone else have a problems with this?
moss missed some time last game with a calf injury. patten has missed alot of time in his career. thrash is solid(hope i dont jinx him :( )

with one injury we drastically limit our offence.

i like nemo but rock is better than he is on offence and special teams and there is alot of depth at rb/fb. nemo should be gone or maybe one of the clemons brothers.


btw, at some point we have to get rid of john hall if he cant stay healthy. we are wasting a roster spot on his bad hamstrings/quadriceps.

Re: why not cut nemo?
 

i think killing and raymer are next on the list, nemo is the big back. rock is more of a catching out of the backfield type rb that can do some short yardage... a bunch of his 3rd and 1s in 2003 where runs to the outside.

Re: why not cut nemo?
 

I like Nemo and feel he's going to be a deciding factor in our offense eventually. Brown had so much potiential, but he couldn't make it as a wide receiver and fumbling on kick offs is a no-no.

We could always resign Dyson if we need another person at WR. I don't believe he signed with anyone else did he?

Re: why not cut nemo?
 

how did everyone forget about our #4 WR Sean Taylor?

Re: why not cut nemo?
 

I've said it before. Bring back Farris. He's a solid WR and returner. You'd think if we wanted a 6' 3" 230 lb WR (Taylor) we would've drafted one or held on to Gardner or McCants. Moving Nemo isn't neccessary until you have another prospect. And how come we didn't see him in fourth and short situations against CHI? :oink:

Re: why not cut nemo?
 

[QUOTE=skinsguy]We could always resign Dyson if we need another person at WR. I don't believe he signed with anyone else did he?[/QUOTE]

Dyson (and McCants) seemed to undermine what we were doing on offense, as if the offense, or Ramsey, wasn't working. :oink:

Re: why not cut nemo?
 

I forgot about Farris - he had a very good game against the Ravens.

Re: why not cut nemo?
 

We can definitely use a big WR now. The speedsters have been effectively rendered useless by the QB switch.

Re: why not cut nemo?
 

*Yawn* Is this going to be in every thread?

Re: why not cut nemo?
 

[QUOTE=BossHog]I've said it before. Bring back Farris. He's a solid WR and returner. You'd think if we wanted a 6' 3" 230 lb WR (Taylor) we would've drafted one or held on to Gardner or McCants. Moving Nemo isn't neccessary until you have another prospect. And how come we didn't see him in fourth and short situations against CHI? :oink:[/QUOTE]
I agree. Farris would be a welcome addition in my book. I really like how he always went 100 miles an hour. I was bumed we cut him.

Re: why not cut nemo?
 

people always seem to get attached to the WR that just wasn't good enough... last year we all wanted to keep gari scott.

Re: why not cut nemo?
 

forget about who was cut and who should come back. isnt having 3 healthy WR's just stupid?

Re: why not cut nemo?
 

I like the new Darth Gibbs. Eff up once and your dead. Either cut or demoted. Watch your back Sellars. One stupid personal foul away from the chop.



PS Sarcasim, this whole dropping guys super freaking early scares the shit out of me. Maybe it will scare the shit out of the guys so they play better on Sunday.

Re: why not cut nemo?
 

[QUOTE=jamf]forget about who was cut and who should come back. isnt having 3 healthy WR's just stupid?[/QUOTE]

Can't find it now but I read that Taylor Jacobs should be at 100 percent for the Dallas game.

Re: why not cut nemo?
 

[QUOTE=BossHog]I've said it before. Bring back Farris. He's a solid WR and returner. You'd think if we wanted a 6' 3" 230 lb WR (Taylor) we would've drafted one or held on to Gardner or McCants. Moving Nemo isn't neccessary until you have another prospect. And how come we didn't see him in fourth and short situations against CHI? :oink:[/QUOTE]

Nemo was inactive for the Bears game.