- - Holdman or Barrow?
|skinsfanthru&thru ||04-16-2004 02:16 AM |
Holdman or Barrow?
Who would be a better signing for the team the next 2 seasons or so? I'm not sure if Holdman has expirience or the talent to play the middle lb slot, but I do know Barrow did one heck of a job last year with an under performing d-line in front of him.
|offiss ||04-16-2004 03:53 AM |
I would go with barrow he's a Gibb's type player, and he would be short term and cheap because of his age, the guy has big time instinct's and I think he can still get it done.
|backrow ||04-16-2004 07:42 AM |
I'm torn! I think our guy Clemons can do it without investing any more on the LB's!
|RTerps2002 ||04-16-2004 02:40 PM |
I would perfer Holdman because he has more speed
|SKINSnCANES ||04-16-2004 02:41 PM |
Barrow wouldnt come cheap. thats why they didnt make him an offer, he wanted to much money. Holdman is a younger player that has done well. He could be more than a two year solution for us. He doesnt usuallyplay middle but Williams would take that into accoutn with his schemes
|skinsfanthru&thru ||04-17-2004 01:57 PM |
since holdman is gone, I think I'd rather go with the scenario of signing barrow, dump mitchell, and use clifton smith as barrows backup. barrow is an upgrade over mitchell and would be a better teacher to help out smith possibly become our starter next year.
|SKINSnCANES ||04-17-2004 02:43 PM |
I dont think Barrow would sign a deal to play in that scenerio. He probably wants his last big deal. Get mabye a four year deal and get be a starter. I cant see him being effective for more than two seasons though. If the Skins coudl get a two year deal for him that be great. Not at teh expense of getting dlinemen though.
|All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 AM. || |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Page generated in 0.07451 seconds with 8 queries
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO