Peter King MMQB
 

Excerpts regarding the Skins:

[quote]SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THE GIANTS' HANDLING OF THEIR LOSS AT WASHINGTON. From [b]Eric, of Bowie N.C.[/b]: "Is there any good reason why the Giants left [b]Will Allen[/b] one-on-one with [b]Santana Moss[/b]? If you double him with a safety, the Redskins have absolutely no passing game.''

I believe the Giants did have a safety over the top; he was just late in getting over to the play. And Eric, did you see the Redskins-Cowboys game last week? Fellow by the name of [b]Chris Cooley[/b], a tight end/H-back, caught three touchdown passes from [b]Mark Brunell[/b]. Know this about a [b]Joe Gibbs[/b]-coached team: He's going to find different ways to get lots of guys involved in the passing game.

SIMPLIFY THE PLAYBOOK FOR ELI MANNING. From [b]Neil Rosen of New York[/b]: "I am a huge Giants fan and think their problems arise when Manning has to do too much. The playbook should be simplified. It should have more screens, down and outs, draw plays and three-step releases.''

Well, Neil, I respect your fervor, and thanks for writing. But let me just say this: No one would be writing this about Manning, and the talk shows in New York wouldn't be filled with Manning hand-wringing in the last three days if [b]Plaxico Burress[/b] had caught a pass right in his hands, in the end zone, on the first play of Saturday's game, and if [b]Chris Snee[/b] hadn't committed a totally meaningless holding penalty on the fourth-quarter touchdown pass to [b]Amani Toomer[/b] that was negated.

[/quote]

Re: Peter King MMQB
 

I love when "respected" columnists use [i]if's[/i] in their columns. It makes them sound far less neutral. If this and that happened, the Giants would have won, eh? Well, I can come up with a handful of [i]if's[/i] that would have Washington at 14-1 [i]if[/i] they had gone the other way.

Re: Peter King MMQB
 

wouldve couldve mightve shit just like coach parcells says you are what you are(right now thats the hottest team in the league)its good to be the king