Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Redskins Interested in TO

Redskins Locker Room


View Poll Results: Is TO Worth It for a Super Bowl-presented by dmek25
Yes-Win at all costs 23 16.08%
No-TO doesn't guarantee us anything but headaches 110 76.92%
I Don't Know-don't ask me to think in the off-season 10 6.99%
Voters: 143. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-01-2006, 03:32 PM   #31
Registered User
 
Hail2em's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Va. Beach, Virginia
Posts: 229
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

Man i hope we really dont get him becuase there will be a conflict between him and santana down the road of who would be no.1 i can see it now and that would cause t.o to go off the handle again. I say we get a quality WR in the draft someone that is consistant and has good hands as Cooleys does.
Hail2em is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-01-2006, 03:36 PM   #32
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 53
Posts: 10,525
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

how about a poll?
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 03:38 PM   #33
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 50
Posts: 3,097
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

Highly unlikly, to many things don't add up, especially at the QB position, one reason he wanted out of San Fran was because Garcia couldn't get him the ball deep, Brunell is very, very similar to Garcia, except he no longer moves as well, same arm strength if Brunell is lucky at this stage of his carreer. So if we are committed to Brunell I can't see TO really wanting to be here.


2- He doesn't represent what Gibbs wants as a team attitude, except 1 thing the guy will do whatever he has to do to win, except shut his mouth. But if you put him in a good situation he would be fine, there are plenty of players who are bigger problems than TO but their more quite about it, TO is always front page news.

There is a possiblilty, aside from is mouth, he has a lot of qualities that Gibbs wants on his team, now, does the good outweigh the bad?
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 03:39 PM   #34
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 53
Posts: 10,525
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

offiss,did you just say brunell was the starter?
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 04:02 PM   #35
Special Teams
 
Master4Caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DC area
Posts: 374
Thumbs down Re: Redskins Interested in TO

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean"Big Hurt"Taylor
T.O. although a headache actually can get us over the hump. Him and Santana with portis in the backfield is a match in heaven.
Whatever this is, it won't be a match made in heaven!

I said on another post and on my blog that as it got closer to release date, the Eagles would make some hard-headed business calls and insist on compensation for Owens' services, and that they would keep him on the roster if they couldn't trade him. It's 50-50 that still could happen.

Now if I were special agent Drew, I would try to foster a competitive atmosphere for Owens by playing on owner's fear, jealousy and ego to drum up a good contract. Hmmm. DS signing Owens to keep JJ from getting him, or vice versa, sounds like that. In fact, this exact scenario was suggested by Stephen A Smith, the Philadelphia Wilbon, just last month. :smashfrea

For the Skins, we've been thru the big name syndrome. It didn't work in '99; won't work in '06. I'd rather go for 27 yr old Reggie Wayne from the "U" than 30-something Owens. Also, I'm resigned to losing Lavar. I would NOT be happy to lose Lavar to make cap room for Owens. There's a price to be paid for getting Owens, and it's more than draft choices.

It's the game between the season, boys! Enjoy the show; but, don't fall for the hype.
Master4Caster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 04:09 PM   #36
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 32
Posts: 16,457
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

he'd cost a bunch still and wouldn't be here long (if the skins were stupid enough to long term him it'd be a real strain on the cap and force releases).
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 04:11 PM   #37
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 50
Posts: 3,097
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25
offiss,did you just say brunell was the starter?

:confused:
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 04:19 PM   #38
Registered User
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 35
Posts: 10,069
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

If T.O. does come here who is #1 receiver? Moss or T.O?
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 04:30 PM   #39
Special Teams
 
skindogger47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 33
Posts: 262
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

TO WILL NOT BE A REDSKIN.


Peter King is full of shit. Andyman, a very credible source from extremeskins, who was a step ahead of the media on the Moss-Coles deal, has denied all Redskin ties to TO. Sleep soundly everyone, Jeff Garcia's ex-boyfriend will not be wearing a Redskins uni next season.
skindogger47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 04:48 PM   #40
Camp Scrub
 
Beat the Cowboys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 39
Unhappy Re: Redskins Interested in TO

WOW, As a Sacramento King fan and a Skin fan that would tie my favorite teams fortunes to Artest and Owens
Beat the Cowboys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 04:56 PM   #41
The Starter
 
jbcjr14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Age: 45
Posts: 2,014
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

God, I sure hope that this isn't true....we don't need any bad apples in the mix, this team is just starting to "get it" and what it takes to be champions.
__________________
"Work Harder: millions on welfare are counting on you" - Obama 2009 address to Congress.
jbcjr14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 05:47 PM   #42
Camp Scrub
 
giacomo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 61
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

i think t.o. would put us as favorites next year, and i also think it would be a better fit in dc. because we have the players who would speak up and get in his face if he acts up, which he will. just think.....who could stop us?????????/
giacomo2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 06:03 PM   #43
Special Teams
 
shallyshal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carnage
i do not believe that the eagles would trade him to division opponent.
agree. unless they feel that it will have more negative effect and weaken an opponent
shallyshal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 06:04 PM   #44
Playmaker
 
70Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 44
Posts: 3,048
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10
Crazy Canuck, join my chorus whenever you feel comfortable...

We don't have the cap room. At least not yet. If the CBA is not extended by March 3 (or if a continuance is not enacted by March 3), then we will actually have to shed players rather than acquiring big names. If the CBA gets extended or there is a continuance, then I can see us having the cap room to do it.
I was wondering if anyone knows what neighborhood the cap will be in if a new deal is struck giving the players a greater piece of the pie. If it happens, isn't the cap likely to increase enough to cover our existing obligations and sign new players such as Keyshawn Johnson?
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven
70Chip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 06:04 PM   #45
Special Teams
 
shallyshal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

let him go to dallas. no way keyshawn stays. they release keyshawn and there is our possession receiver for next year
shallyshal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.44538 seconds with 10 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25