Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Redskins Interested in TO

Redskins Locker Room


View Poll Results: Is TO Worth It for a Super Bowl-presented by dmek25
Yes-Win at all costs 23 16.08%
No-TO doesn't guarantee us anything but headaches 110 76.92%
I Don't Know-don't ask me to think in the off-season 10 6.99%
Voters: 143. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-01-2006, 07:00 PM   #61
The Starter
 
#56fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 40
Posts: 1,789
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70Chip
You won't hear me say they shouldn't sign T.O. Especially if the cap goes up. I believe T.O.'s discontent in Philly was all about the money. They are a cheapskate, second rate, fly by night outfit. To Terell Owens I say this: You've tried the Motel 6 and the Best Western, move on over to the Waldorf. Become a Redskin and let your freak flag fly.

That is what is or was wrong w/ this team in the past. People came here just for the money. We need to get the attitude away from this franchise. Which I think Joe is doing.
#56fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-01-2006, 07:07 PM   #62
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sterling, VA
Age: 28
Posts: 4,444
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

comcast said that the redskins have no intrest, that it may just be rosenhaus trying to make teams think that they need to bid higher for t.o.
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 07:08 PM   #63
Special Teams
 
jordanz301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: damascus, maryland
Age: 26
Posts: 161
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

exactly wat i was thinking who would be the #1 receiver omg i can already see it "disgruntled T.O sounds off for not being #1 guy" i can already see the headlines


Quote:
Originally Posted by Hail2em
Man i hope we really dont get him becuase there will be a conflict between him and santana down the road of who would be no.1 i can see it now and that would cause t.o to go off the handle again. I say we get a quality WR in the draft someone that is consistant and has good hands as Cooleys does.
jordanz301 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 07:41 PM   #64
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,261
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

If Santana was a team player (which I think he is) he wouldn't care. Essentially, Moss would be in single coverage the majority of the time. You can't tell me that a team would leave T.O. in single coverage, he would break the single game receiving mark. In Saunders version of Air Coryell, there will be plenty of balls to go around.

T.O. would be great for so many reasons. How would you game plan for the Redskins offense? With T.O. you get the entire package. He is the prototypical possesion receiver except if he breaks a tackle he is gone. He is too big, strong and fast for any corner in the league. He takes 5 yard catches and turns them into 70 yard T.D.s and the most important part, he is in the prime of his career.

Also, he is an insurance policy. What if either him or Santana gets an injury late in the year? They still have a number one to go to.

If they signed him they would go from turnaround story to the favorite to win the Super Bowl and the best part is they would be taking the most talented player from the Eagles and preventing him from going to Dallas at the same time.

I think it is a risk worth taking.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 07:45 PM   #65
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,465
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

I wouldn't mind seeing the Redskins getting TO if he can make a positive impact. I don't think the skins are seriously in the mix. We have often been used by agents to get more money and more compensation out of other teams.
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 07:49 PM   #66
MVP
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NoVa
Age: 26
Posts: 12,163
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

i hope we do not bring t.o. in. He is the ultimate team cancer, it's only a time before he starts destroying all the chemistry and sanity in the locker room. In the event the skins actually do get him, i will not like him anymore, even if he is wearing the skins uniform. i would hope it's only for a one year contract, anything longer than that spells trouble.
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 07:55 PM   #67
Playmaker
 
gibbsisgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 35
Posts: 3,503
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

This goes against every thing Gibbs is doing here. Gibbs is not just about winning now, he may want to win now but he is building for the future.The team that picks up TO is clearly only worried about the here and now. He will give you maybe one good season(if he can stay healthy) and then he will start his crybaby bullshit tactics until he totally distroys the clubhouse.he is a ME first player in a TEAM sport. This will not happen under Joe Gibbs!
gibbsisgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 07:58 PM   #68
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,261
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

I guess the question that you have to ask yourself is whether the current team has enough talent to win the Super Bowl. I loved this year's team. They played like 53 brothers and after beating the crap out of the Seahawks (who I think will win on Sunday) they showed that they were the toughest team in the playoffs.

However, I think that even the most die hard fans would have to admit that the balls bounced their way several times this year. I do not think that the current team has enough talent to win it all (and don't tell me that Randle-El is the key to a title). Now if you add T.O. to the equation and they look like a champion...
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 08:03 PM   #69
Playmaker
 
gibbsisgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 35
Posts: 3,503
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper
Now if you add T.O. to the equation and they look like a champion...
the eagles thought that way 2 years ago and look what it got them.
gibbsisgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 08:07 PM   #70
The Starter
 
Warpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Potomac Falls, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 1,762
Thumbs down Re: Redskins Interested in TO

My take is NO to T.O. Id make a sign but nobody would see it. Hes nothing but trouble. Thats the last thing this team needs a spoiled b*tch ass like T.O. When we got that guy who wore #21 a few years ago (I hope we finished paying off his contract) and now wears #37 in Baltimore I never liked him as a Redskin. I never cheered for him, and yes that includes when he would return a pick or punt for a TD, which I think he only did once or twice. Anyways all Im saying, if T.O. comes here I will not cheer for him. I will not buy his jersey. He is definitely not a Gibbs guy so Im really not that worried about T.O. landing in DC. Id say he'll end up i neither Denver or Miami.
Warpath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 08:21 PM   #71
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,261
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

Quote:
Originally Posted by gibbsisgod
the eagles thought that way 2 years ago and look what it got them.
They also were in the Superbowl and had the ball with a chance to win the game but I guess you wouldn't want the Redskins in that position...
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 08:26 PM   #72
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

no T.O.
steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 08:29 PM   #73
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper
They also were in the Superbowl and had the ball with a chance to win the game but I guess you wouldn't want the Redskins in that position...
since T.O. has been in the league, there have been 19 superbowl teams that didnt have T.O. and 1 that did(and they lost) We don't need T.O.
steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 08:50 PM   #74
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sterling, VA
Age: 28
Posts: 4,444
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

t.o. isnt coming per comcast so this is idle banter
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 08:59 PM   #75
Camp Scrub
 
Drago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Severn MD.
Age: 59
Posts: 43
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean"Big Hurt"Taylor
T.O. although a headache actually can get us over the hump. Him and Santana with portis in the backfield is a match in heaven. Look out in 06 for us to make a major splash.
T.O. will clash with Santana, Santana is our # 1 reciever and wants to stay that way. We need a real good #3 reciever, one that is good enough to step up to # 2 when necessary. If we would have had that type of #3 reciever to step in for David Patten, we would be playing the Steelers this week. We have greater needs on this team than another #1 reciever. How about a pass rusher, depth in the secondary and offensive line.
__________________
You got Skins to the left, Skins to the right and your the only game in town
Drago is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.32836 seconds with 10 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25