Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-06-2006, 02:36 PM   #46
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 32
Posts: 17,548
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

Thrash was the guy (when Tupa was punting) who was down there almost EVERY TIME to down the ball within the 5.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-06-2006, 03:36 PM   #47
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 52
Posts: 10,517
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

tupa???you must be talking ancient history.
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 03:40 PM   #48
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 32
Posts: 17,548
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

Yup, that ancient history that was all of one season ago. Regardless of who was there as punter, both Jimoh and Thrash were always ALL OVER the punts that Frost "boomed".
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 03:45 PM   #49
Robert Griffin III
 
Monksdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 33
Posts: 1,495
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25
i think more of ade on special teams than i do of thrash.im not sure what that means????
I disagree because Thrash is available to receive as well as cover.
__________________
Robert Griffin III
Monksdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 04:34 PM   #50
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 31
Posts: 16,278
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

D'BOYZ, lavar saves 4.2 regardless. jansen, samuels, springs, brunell, portis, thomas have all restructured if the cba dies. that could be over 10$ mill + 4.2 (lavar) right there.

the projected cuts (regardless of cba) are 11$mill. we're not in terrible shape.

the 30% rule ONLY went into effect because its the year before an expiring cba (and the last salary capped season). A new cba would kill it.
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 05:09 PM   #51
Special Teams
 
jordanz301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: damascus, maryland
Age: 26
Posts: 161
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

w/e happeend to talkin ab archuleta
__________________
"meet sean taylor"
jordanz301 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 05:10 PM   #52
Impact Rookie
 
STPainmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 524
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jordanz301
w/e happeend to talkin ab archuleta

I was thinking the same thing?????
__________________
REDSKINS FOR LIFE BEEETCH!!!!
STPainmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 07:28 PM   #53
The Starter
 
D'BOYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,363
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
D'BOYZ, lavar saves 4.2 regardless. jansen, samuels, springs, brunell, portis, thomas have all restructured if the cba dies. that could be over 10$ mill + 4.2 (lavar) right there.

the projected cuts (regardless of cba) are 11$mill. we're not in terrible shape.

the 30% rule ONLY went into effect because its the year before an expiring cba (and the last salary capped season). A new cba would kill it.

Yeah I know the 4.2 is saved regardless because of him being cut and that was the agreement for his realeas

And no the 30% rule has Allways been in the CBA check previous contracts you can't have a contract with a BASE salary with an increase of the salary of beyond 30% each season. you can have roster bonus, incentives, or bonus but the player salary can't have an increase of beyond 30%
D'BOYZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 08:20 PM   #54
Robert Griffin III
 
Monksdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 33
Posts: 1,495
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

Take one step forward. Then slide to the right. Insert conversation here. No! do not go off on related tangents......No Thrash for you!
__________________
Robert Griffin III
Monksdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 08:58 PM   #55
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 31
Posts: 16,278
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

Quote:
Originally Posted by D'BOYZ
Yeah I know the 4.2 is saved regardless because of him being cut and that was the agreement for his realeas

And no the 30% rule has Allways been in the CBA check previous contracts you can't have a contract with a BASE salary with an increase of the salary of beyond 30% each season. you can have roster bonus, incentives, or bonus but the player salary can't have an increase of beyond 30%
no, the 30% rule only came into effect this year, that's why guys like jansen and others jumped up in salary this season. It stays in effect into uncapped years too.

jansen in 2004 made 1.3, this year he makes 4mill, 1.3 *1.3 = 1.8 * 1.3 = 2.4.

2.4 is not close to 4, so the contract had to jump more than 30% in base in either 2005 or 2006. so you're wrong :P
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 10:06 PM   #56
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
no, the 30% rule only came into effect this year, that's why guys like jansen and others jumped up in salary this season. It stays in effect into uncapped years too.

jansen in 2004 made 1.3, this year he makes 4mill, 1.3 *1.3 = 1.8 * 1.3 = 2.4.

2.4 is not close to 4, so the contract had to jump more than 30% in base in either 2005 or 2006. so you're wrong :P
well, he is a dallas fan...
steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 10:11 PM   #57
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,732
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

Adam Archuleta...just trying to get us back on topic
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 10:57 PM   #58
Karma Chameleon (I come and go)
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Annapolis, MD
Age: 30
Posts: 3,087
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

I don't really like the idea of adding him. He's suspect in pass coverage. I don't really look at him much different than Roy Williams. They're glorified linebackers.

"If they want a slightly better, infinitely more expensive version of Matt Bowen, they should would just keep him."

That's what a buddy of mine said about Archuleta coming to the Skins...he's a Rams fan.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack
Albert Connell is perhaps the worst Redskin I ever had the misfortune of meeting. He's the kind of guy that makes media people covering their favorite team growing up no longer like that team
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 11:18 PM   #59
Franchise Player
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 9,958
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
no, the 30% rule only came into effect this year, that's why guys like jansen and others jumped up in salary this season. It stays in effect into uncapped years too.

jansen in 2004 made 1.3, this year he makes 4mill, 1.3 *1.3 = 1.8 * 1.3 = 2.4.

2.4 is not close to 4, so the contract had to jump more than 30% in base in either 2005 or 2006. so you're wrong :P
Yup.

I think your understanding of the reasoning for the 30% rule is also off. The 30% rule was provided so teams couldn't restructure th ehll out of contracts in the '06 season to be cap compliant. It was one of the poision pills they thought would force everyone to play nice and get a CBA done. Example.

Player A has a 5 year deal with a 10 mil signing bonus. With three years left in '06 his salary is lets say 3 mil. That gives him a cap number of 5 mil. Without the 30% rule the player restructures that into a bonus and reduces his salary to the vet minimum. That makes his salary .450 mil(i think) and his bonus prorate 3 mil(original signing bonus prorate of 2 plus the new bonus prorate of 1). His cap number is now 3.45. But this can't be done because no player is going to negotiate down his future salary which is most likely more than 30% above 3.45 since these slaries are used as leverage by players.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 11:36 PM   #60
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 31
Posts: 16,278
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

i understand it fine. it was so you couldn't have $1 contracts this year and 20million next year. and it'll stay in effect unless a new cba comes into effect or a new salary cap is constructed at some later date without it (if the current cba efforts do die).
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.30688 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25