Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-06-2006, 11:11 PM   #61
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,971
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

Adam Archuleta...just trying to get us back on topic
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-06-2006, 11:57 PM   #62
Karma Chameleon
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Annapolis, MD
Age: 30
Posts: 3,101
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

I don't really like the idea of adding him. He's suspect in pass coverage. I don't really look at him much different than Roy Williams. They're glorified linebackers.

"If they want a slightly better, infinitely more expensive version of Matt Bowen, they should would just keep him."

That's what a buddy of mine said about Archuleta coming to the Skins...he's a Rams fan.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2006, 12:18 AM   #63
Franchise Player
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 36
Posts: 9,984
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
no, the 30% rule only came into effect this year, that's why guys like jansen and others jumped up in salary this season. It stays in effect into uncapped years too.

jansen in 2004 made 1.3, this year he makes 4mill, 1.3 *1.3 = 1.8 * 1.3 = 2.4.

2.4 is not close to 4, so the contract had to jump more than 30% in base in either 2005 or 2006. so you're wrong :P
Yup.

I think your understanding of the reasoning for the 30% rule is also off. The 30% rule was provided so teams couldn't restructure th ehll out of contracts in the '06 season to be cap compliant. It was one of the poision pills they thought would force everyone to play nice and get a CBA done. Example.

Player A has a 5 year deal with a 10 mil signing bonus. With three years left in '06 his salary is lets say 3 mil. That gives him a cap number of 5 mil. Without the 30% rule the player restructures that into a bonus and reduces his salary to the vet minimum. That makes his salary .450 mil(i think) and his bonus prorate 3 mil(original signing bonus prorate of 2 plus the new bonus prorate of 1). His cap number is now 3.45. But this can't be done because no player is going to negotiate down his future salary which is most likely more than 30% above 3.45 since these slaries are used as leverage by players.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2006, 12:36 AM   #64
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 32
Posts: 16,279
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

i understand it fine. it was so you couldn't have $1 contracts this year and 20million next year. and it'll stay in effect unless a new cba comes into effect or a new salary cap is constructed at some later date without it (if the current cba efforts do die).
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2006, 02:06 AM   #65
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 29
Posts: 14,734
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

How bout moving him to the Weakside spot? All he needs to gain is 7 pounds.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2006, 04:43 PM   #66
Special Teams
 
jordanz301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: damascus, maryland
Age: 26
Posts: 161
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlea
I don't really like the idea of adding him. He's suspect in pass coverage. I don't really look at him much different than Roy Williams. They're glorified linebackers.

"If they want a slightly better, infinitely more expensive version of Matt Bowen, they should would just keep him."

That's what a buddy of mine said about Archuleta coming to the Skins...he's a Rams fan.
i always kinda liked matt bowen gw jst seemed to not like him. he was a pretty good tackler. but i would never forget when TROY HAMBRICK broke his ankles so bad in a dallas game like a long time ago. troy hambrick sucked so bad but wen he faced the skins he was always beast. the past couple yrs dallas went through, troy hambrick, eddie george, julios jones, barber whos next?..
__________________
"meet sean taylor"
jordanz301 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2006, 04:44 PM   #67
Special Teams
 
jordanz301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: damascus, maryland
Age: 26
Posts: 161
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

as for archuleta i love the guy love to see him in washington if we lose ryan clark
__________________
"meet sean taylor"
jordanz301 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2006, 04:47 PM   #68
What will Shanny do this offseason?
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,407
Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?

ryan clark still hangs out in ashburn, he has shown e wants to stay
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.18177 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25