Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


WR Core Makeup

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-12-2006, 01:41 PM   #1
Eternally Legendary
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 35
Posts: 9,983
WR Core Makeup

Many will be disappointed and many will be jubilant but this much is true, Taylor Jacobs future with the Redskins is nearing the end of its life-cycle, especially if the Redskins are still pursuing another receiver. Will Jacobs be the first WR cut or will it be Thrash or Patten?

When Taylor get the axe I'm planning on sending him a "Good Luck" card. Who in here will sigh it and what would you write on it?
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-12-2006, 01:43 PM   #2
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,261
Re: WR Core Makeup

Jacobs and Thrash. I have to think you give Patten a shot as the #3.

You heard it here first. Patten will have 800 yards as the #3 next year! I really like the Redskin wideouts right now. Now, one injury and you have '05 all over again.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 01:43 PM   #3
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 83,005
Re: WR Core Makeup

I'm surprised Jacobs wasn't axed already.

Thrash seems to be the most safe out of the bunch since he's a quality special teams guy. If we pick up Randle El then Patten could easily be on the bubble, but I doubt it. I could see our WRs looking like this in 2006:

1. Moss
2. Lloyd
3. Randle El
4. Patten
5. Thrash
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 01:44 PM   #4
Impact Rookie
 
STPainmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 524
Re: WR Core Makeup

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1
Many will be disappointed and many will be jubilant but this much is true, Taylor Jacobs future with the Redskins is nearing the end of its life-cycle, especially if the Redskins are still pursuing another receiver. Will Jacobs be the first WR cut or will it be Thrash or Patten?

When Taylor get the axe I'm planning on sending him a "Good Luck" card. Who in here will sigh it and what would you write on it?
Dear Taylor,

I have friends in Frankfurt please say hi when your dropping balls in NFL Europe. I also have friends who own a gas station say hi to them after you get cut from NFL Europe.
__________________
REDSKINS FOR LIFE BEEETCH!!!!
STPainmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 02:05 PM   #5
The Starter
 
Bozzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ina, house
Age: 34
Posts: 1,034
Re: WR Core Makeup

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
I'm surprised Jacobs wasn't axed already.

Thrash seems to be the most safe out of the bunch since he's a quality special teams guy. If we pick up Randle El then Patten could easily be on the bubble, but I doubt it. I could see our WRs looking like this in 2006:

1. Moss
2. Lloyd
3. Randle El
4. Patten
5. Thrash

Not to mention that there'd still be Chris Cooley or Clinton Portis getting open.
Bozzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 02:39 PM   #6
The Starter
 
GoSkins!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 45
Posts: 1,587
Re: WR Core Makeup

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
I'm surprised Jacobs wasn't axed already.

Thrash seems to be the most safe out of the bunch since he's a quality special teams guy. If we pick up Randle El then Patten could easily be on the bubble, but I doubt it. I could see our WRs looking like this in 2006:

1. Moss
2. Lloyd
3. Randle El
4. Patten
5. Thrash
I think that Randle El wont be signed. It looks like the Skins brought him in to make sure, if Lloyd fell through, we would have a guy we could make sure signed before he left the park. Once the Lloyd deal was done, I think that the Randle El deal became a routine visit. How much can we really justify paying a third receiver? Patten as a number three would be just fine.

Moss
Lloyd
Patten
Thrash
???
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien
GoSkins! is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 02:42 PM   #7
The Starter
 
drew54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: IOWA
Age: 32
Posts: 1,290
Re: WR Core Makeup

Moss
Lloyd
Patten
Thrash
??? = Rookie, Fourth round or later.
__________________
No pressure, no diamonds.
drew54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 02:47 PM   #8
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,893
Re: WR Core Makeup

If they don't sign Randle El, then I think Antonio Brown stays as the #5 WR. Though he'll primarily serve as a KR. Unless they decide to keep 6 wide receivers in which case Brown (or maybe Farriss) becomes the #6 WR.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 03:35 PM   #9
Camp Scrub
 
Heart of Burgundy & Gold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Williamsburg,Va
Age: 47
Posts: 14
Re: WR Core Makeup

as matty said i cant believe he hasnt been cut yet. he was finally given a chance to prove he belongs in the NFL, but blew it completly. i personally think he doesnt have the mental balls to be at this level.
__________________
Hey Ken Harvey,you doing anything on sundays this year?
Heart of Burgundy & Gold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 04:06 PM   #10
No new threads for you
 
PorterHouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 38
Posts: 230
Re: WR Core Makeup

I think if we get Randel El, Patten becomes a cap casualty and Thrash stays on as a special teamer. Taylor gets another chance. we are gonna need the money.
PorterHouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 04:13 PM   #11
Camp Scrub
 
giacomo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 61
Re: WR Core Makeup

Laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaterrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrr Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatorrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!
giacomo2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 04:30 PM   #12
The Starter
 
RedskinPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Camino,Ca
Posts: 1,174
Re: WR Core Makeup

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bozzy
Not to mention that there'd still be Chris Cooley or Clinton Portis getting open.
Yes Cooley and Portis are going to see a lot more passes in a Al O!!!! Burnell will have a arsenal of weapons! Run and pass at well and keep the D from having to save the O every game I say!!!!!
RedskinPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 06:40 PM   #13
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 31
Posts: 16,278
Re: WR Core Makeup

i think trash, brown and jacobs may all go cause it'd save us 1.9mill. (brown is now ~500k with the new cba, jacobs can be dumped at anytime and treated as a post june 1 cut, saving 460k, and trash saves 875k).

2mill is a lot of money for zero return and could be used to get 1 player who isn't terrible.
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.26281 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25