![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #31 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,693
| Re: Should we have gone after Givens? The anti-Randle El folks puzzle me a bit. Is it just because of his contract? Because I don't see what's not to love about the guy. He's such a dangerous player because of his versatility. Saunders will probably have a field day devising ways to get him the ball, and then there's his outstanding special teams play. We basically got 3-4 players in one package with him. Kordell Stewart might be the original 'Slash', but Randle El has taken the 'Slash' role to an entirely different level. |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #32 | |
| Fighting off The Crazies Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Virginia Beach Age: 39
Posts: 5,280
| Re: Should we have gone after Givens? Quote:
Smoot and Pierce were Schottenheimer's selections when he made all personnel decisions. | |
| | |
| | #33 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Springfield, VA Age: 30
Posts: 15,623
| Re: Should we have gone after Givens? Quote:
he might have been asked to wait till they make space as well.
__________________ Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes! | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |