Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Redskins over/under

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-13-2006, 11:22 AM   #1
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 79,438
Redskins over/under

I'm just going to toss a few out there, if you want to add some feel free.

Simply discuss whether you think the number will go over or under and why.

Wins: 10

Brunell:
3000 yards
20 TDs
10 INTs

Portis:
1400 yards
10 TDs

Moss:
75 catches
1200 yards
8 TDs

Cooley:
65 catches
650 yards
7 TDs

Carter:
10 sacks

Taylor:
5 INTs
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 07-13-2006, 11:29 AM   #2
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 32
Posts: 17,427
Re: Redskins over/under

I'm going to go with over for all of the above except Taylor and Carter. While I think Taylor and Carter will both have huge seasons, I still don't think many people will throw Taylor's direction. I also think Carter will have a great season, but it'll be between him and Daniels and I bet they BOTH have 8 sacks a piece.

As far as the rest, I can easily see them topping those numbers for the year. Cooley I might be on the fence about because I feel his yardage might drop with his TDs going up.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 11:30 AM   #3
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 32
Posts: 17,427
Re: Redskins over/under

I'm especially over on the wins. I truly believe this year's team can put together a 13-3 or 14-2 season barring key injuries.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 11:37 AM   #4
Playmaker
 
724Skinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,504
Re: Redskins over/under

Taylor:
5 INTs

Does this one mean that Sean Taylor will have caused 5 intestinal release prematurely incidents? If so, I think that number is for Terry Glenn alone.
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn
724Skinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 11:49 AM   #5
Playmaker
 
BDBohnzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Age: 35
Posts: 4,438
Re: Redskins over/under

7 Times Brud will be drunk at a regular season tailgate....

I'm gonna take the under on Brunell...I think there will be a big emphasis on either Portis running, or Campbell taking over the reins. And I'll take the under on Taylor's INTs. If you had said turnovers, I think he'll have a combined 5+ INTs/Fumble Recoveries.
__________________
Bad Things man, I mean bad things...

“WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris
BDBohnzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 11:54 AM   #6
Closet Redskins Fan
 
5RINGS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 495
Re: Redskins over/under

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
I'm just going to toss a few out there, if you want to add some feel free.

Simply discuss whether you think the number will go over or under and why.

Wins: 10

Brunell:
3000 yards
20 TDs
10 INTs

Portis:
1400 yards
10 TDs

Moss:
75 catches
1200 yards
8 TDs

Cooley:
65 catches
650 yards
7 TDs

Carter:
10 sacks

Taylor:
5 INTs
Wins - 11 Tough Division.

Brunell - Under no way he goes all season without missing games.
Portis - over 1400 yards 10 Td sounds right
Moss - under - not going to surprise anyone this year. Not even Dallas
Cooley - Under, Brunell now has options other than Moss Or Portis
Carter - Don't Know. If there are ANY injuries on the DLine he is doubled every snap.

Taylor - Over He should be able to ball hawk and leave the box more with Arch signed
__________________
I am a complete and unabashed Romosexual.
5RINGS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 11:56 AM   #7
The Starter
 
backrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 36.28 x 76.22
Age: 62
Posts: 1,799
Re: Redskins over/under

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
I'm just going to toss a few out there, if you want to add some feel free.

Simply discuss whether you think the number will go over or under and why.

Wins: 10

Brunell:
3000 yards
20 TDs
10 INTs

Portis:
1400 yards
10 TDs

Moss:
75 catches
1200 yards
8 TDs

Cooley:
65 catches
650 yards
7 TDs

Carter:
10 sacks

Taylor:
5 INTs

Wins - Even, maybe over at 11 wins as a push
Brunnell - Under - Week 8-13, he pops a __(insert injury)___, and JC steps it up! Not a wish, just going by recent history.

C. Portis - Over, but only by a few yds, and only by 1 TD.

Moss - Even

Cooley - Under on the TDs - Whoever QBs at the time spreads it out to the RB equally.


Carter - Under by 1, make it 9 sacks

Taylor - Under by 2, make it 3 picks

Division Championship: 1

PO Victories: 1 (at home)
__________________
'37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship!
backrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 12:48 PM   #8
Eternally Legendary
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 34
Posts: 9,841
Re: Redskins over/under

Win - 12
If we aren't progressing we are regressing and this team is a whole lot better than last year. And yes, 12 wins is a conservative number.

Brunell - Over
If he stays healthy or even plays 14 games his TDs and INT stats should both go up. As for the yardage, it sounds just about right. Saunders will work his magic.

Portis - Definitely Over
1600 yards and 16 TDs is no joke and he'll get it. If Larry Johnson can do it Portis can too.

Moss - Push
Defenses will try to harass him every chance they get.

Cooley - Push
I don't see his roll definitioning and if the other receivers we got don't pan-out like we thought they would Cooley will step up to the plate.

Taylor - Push
His fate depends on 1) what Williams wants him to do and 2) the performance of Arch.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 12:50 PM   #9
Playmaker
 
gibbsisgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 34
Posts: 3,503
Re: Redskins over/under

Wins: take the over. we should have atleast 11
Portis: take the over, but not by much. i think he gets 1500 again but 10 tds sounds reasonable
Moss: take the over(i still think he catches 100 balls.)
Carter: take the under just because of the depth we have at d-line. i think the groups total sacks will improve but i dont think any 1 individual will have more than 8.
gibbsisgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 12:59 PM   #10
Playmaker
 
BrudLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
Re: Redskins over/under

Quote:
Originally Posted by BDBohnzie
7 Times Brud will be drunk at a regular season tailgate...
Hmm...

I'm going to go "under". I may miss two games this year. And Monday Night shouldn't count, because there's a very good chance I would have been half in the bag anyway.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too.
BrudLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 01:11 PM   #11
Playmaker
 
BrudLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
Re: Redskins over/under

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
Wins: 10
Over. I see eleven wins this year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
Brunell:
3000 yards
20 TDs
10 INTs
I'm going under on all three. I don't see Brunell playing every minute of every game. Be it injury, or just wanting Campbell to get work, I think we'll see enough of the kid to keep Brunell's numbers down.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
Portis:
1400 yards
10 TDs
Definitely over on yards. Probably over on TDs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
Moss:
75 catches
1200 yards
8 TDs
Probably under on yards. The other numbers are dead on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
Cooley:
65 catches
650 yards
7 TDs
Good numbers here as well. I'd be hard pressed to bet in either direction.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
Carter:
10 sacks
I'm going to go under - but I think Carter is going to create space for Griffin and Salave'a.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
Taylor:
5 INTs
My gut says under, but he will be the disruptive force we know and love.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too.
BrudLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 01:47 PM   #12
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 32
Posts: 17,427
Re: Redskins over/under

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5RINGS
Wins - 11 Tough Division.

Brunell - Under no way he goes all season without missing games.
Portis - over 1400 yards 10 Td sounds right
Moss - under - not going to surprise anyone this year. Not even Dallas
Cooley - Under, Brunell now has options other than Moss Or Portis
Carter - Don't Know. If there are ANY injuries on the DLine he is doubled every snap.

Taylor - Over He should be able to ball hawk and leave the box more with Arch signed
Not sure if you know a whole lot about the Skins backups, but they are pretty interchangable pieces in GW's puzzle. The interior defensive line is like a well-oiled machine, only an injury to Daniels might hurt the Skins and still they have Demetric Evans who was a force late in the season.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 02:23 PM   #13
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 79,438
Re: Redskins over/under

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection
Not sure if you know a whole lot about the Skins backups, but they are pretty interchangable pieces in GW's puzzle. The interior defensive line is like a well-oiled machine, only an injury to Daniels might hurt the Skins and still they have Demetric Evans who was a force late in the season.
Just to add, our d-line actually has some nice depth going this year. We beefed up at DT in the draft, and with Wynn, Daniels, and now Carter we have nice depth at DE.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 02:28 PM   #14
Franchise Player
 
ArtMonkDrillz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 31
Posts: 7,938
Re: Redskins over/under

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
Just to add, our d-line actually has some nice depth going this year. We beefed up at DT in the draft, and with Wynn, Daniels, and now Carter we have nice depth at DE.
This is kind of dumb, but would McCune be too small to use as a DE if the d-line were desperate?
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
ArtMonkDrillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 02:43 PM   #15
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 52
Posts: 10,504
Re: Redskins over/under

amd, quit high jacking this thread. and good afternoon
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.30627 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25