![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Special Teams Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 197
| Eagles for real? I think the eagles looked much more sharp than the giants or cowboys and they should not be slept on in our division like many people on this site are doing if I am wrong to be concerned let me know cause i love it when ya keep it real!!
__________________ YALL DON'T WANNA SEE ME SHINE THAT'S OKAY CAUSE I LOVE ME SOME ME BELIEVE IT!! |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #2 |
| Living Legend ![]() Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: chesapeake, va Age: 49
Posts: 15,206
| Re: eages for real? It realy dosn't matter if we take them lightly I know our team and coatching staff won't. I only saw part of the first half when Houston was still playing them pretty tough. I think we will know more about them after next week because Huston is not a good team. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Special Teams Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 197
| Re: eagles for real? thanks I was getting worried
__________________ YALL DON'T WANNA SEE ME SHINE THAT'S OKAY CAUSE I LOVE ME SOME ME BELIEVE IT!! |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA Age: 48
Posts: 594
| Re: eages for real? With McNabb back and healthy, the Eagles definitely will contend with the three other teams for the NFC East title. It would be nice not to have to think about them again this year, but I don't think that will be the case.
__________________ a Skins fan every day, every way. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Raleigh, NC Age: 26
Posts: 447
| Re: eages for real? yeah i def fear the eagles more than anyone else in the division. mainly of one man. mcnabb, he's healthy and looking to have a big big year. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,737
| Re: eages for real? Look at who they were playing. The Giants and Cowboys both played playoff caliber teams, while the Eagles played a team that will likely be competing for a top 5 pick. I think the Eagles will be much improved this year, but beating a lowly Texans team doesn't impress me all that much. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 267
| Re: Eagles for real? We'll see about those Eagles next week when they play the G-men. Next week will say alot about how tough our division is gonna be WSH vs DAL and NYG vs PHI. Needless to say wins outside the division are critical.
__________________ JANK-e SPANK-e |
| | |
| | #8 |
| MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 51
Posts: 10,442
| Re: Eagles for real? the eagles will be much improved, and with that gravy schedule they have, we have to take care of business when we get the chance
__________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Potomac, MD Age: 26
Posts: 304
| Re: Eagles for real? they will go 4-0...first 4 games are too easy....but then they will stumble....not worried until they beat someone playoff worthy
__________________ DaveyFoSho |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Canada Age: 39
Posts: 260
| Re: Eagles for real? eagles is surely the wild card in our division with mcnabb being healthy I just hope that we can split out game with them (very difficult to win in their homecourt) and sweep both giants and cowboys |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Living Legend ![]() Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: chesapeake, va Age: 49
Posts: 15,206
| Re: Eagles for real? |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL Age: 42
Posts: 4,529
| Re: Eagles for real? The Eagles are going to be a tough game for everyone.. They are still weak at the WR position but McNabb, if healthy, is a top 5 QB and can lead them to 8-9 wins. I'm not buying them as a frontrunner in the division yet though.
__________________ No Pressure-No Diamonds! Go Catch Your Dreams! |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Eternally Legendary ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 33
Posts: 9,738
| Re: eages for real? Quote:
Yeah, but they thrashed the Texans in the second half....that has to count for something. Remember folks, last year we barely beat them and if you think they'll just roll over and die this year you are sadly mistaken. We should be OK at home but in Philly, I'm definitely concerned.
__________________ RG3, RGIII, RG三, RG३, RGγʹ, RGג, RG٣, RG๓, RG..., RG셋, RGԳ! | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 380
| Re: Eagles for real? What we learned about the NFC East on Sunday: NYG -- Not as good as the Colts. LA is not the second coming. DAL -- Not as good as the Jags. Now they have to deal with a QB controversy. PHI -- Better than HOU in the second half. BTW, if Stallworth is the answer, it is almost certainly a really stupid question. None of these teams are GB bad, but the DAL and NYG preseason hype was wishful thinking.
__________________ "Lighten up, Sandy Baby." |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Potomac, MD Age: 26
Posts: 304
| Re: Eagles for real? i dunno the gmen just do not impress me at all...very overrated!!
__________________ DaveyFoSho |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |