Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Warrick Holdman Haters

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-11-2006, 11:20 PM   #1
Camp Scrub
 
tika49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Texas
Age: 38
Posts: 13
Warrick Holdman Haters

Hey for all you Warrick Holdman hater, and Lavar lovers, I think the Kid held his own and did a good job alongside Lemar and Marcus
tika49 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-11-2006, 11:20 PM   #2
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 79,418
Re: Warrick Holdman Haters

He played well.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2006, 11:22 PM   #3
Camp Scrub
 
TAYLOR21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: DALE CITY,VA
Age: 24
Posts: 22
Re: Warrick Holdman Haters

man who gives a fu** about lavar hes in ny now!!
TAYLOR21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2006, 11:28 PM   #4
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Age: 27
Posts: 4,439
Re: Warrick Holdman Haters

warrick did look good, props to him. linebackers were the only decent unit of the defense tonight
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 12:02 AM   #5
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 28
Posts: 7,495
Re: Warrick Holdman Haters

Honestly....I saw the game live so I cant be sure, but he looked like he played maybe better than anyone on the team.
__________________
#21
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 12:06 AM   #6
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 40
Posts: 5,293
Re: Warrick Holdman Haters

This has nothing to do with Holdman, because I thought he was decent tonight, but...

Would it kill the defense to force a turnover? For as quick as they are to get to the ball carrier, you'd think there'd be some sort of emphasis on ripping the ball away.

That's another knock on this D. Turnovers don't come easy for them.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 08:59 AM   #7
The Starter
 
#56fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 39
Posts: 1,788
Re: Warrick Holdman Haters

I am just not impressed with Holdman. they still ran the ball quite well to that side of the field. He looked like he took a couple of wrong angles going for tackles. I think he looks a lot better physically this year than he did last year. Maybe a little quicker. I did see him running around more, compared to last year. I wouldn't mind seeing Rocky play a little more. He is a beast, we just need him to learn the D a little faster.
#56fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 12:27 PM   #8
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 34
Posts: 8,317
Re: Warrick Holdman Haters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
This has nothing to do with Holdman, because I thought he was decent tonight, but...

Would it kill the defense to force a turnover? For as quick as they are to get to the ball carrier, you'd think there'd be some sort of emphasis on ripping the ball away.

That's another knock on this D. Turnovers don't come easy for them.
They actually forced a fumble (that went out of bounds) and almost had two picks, they just couldn't seal the deal. That was the case early last year. I think they'll turn it around, like they did late last year.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 12:59 PM   #9
Franchise Player
 
ArtMonkDrillz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 31
Posts: 7,938
Re: Warrick Holdman Haters

They also forced Johnson to fumble, but their o-lineman recovered it.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
ArtMonkDrillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 01:31 PM   #10
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Warrick Holdman Haters

Holdman played well, the run d was solid, we just couldn't stop them on 3rd down.
Anyone notice how the gmen hardly played lavar in passing situations?
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 10:19 PM   #11
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 31
Posts: 16,155
Re: Warrick Holdman Haters

they had 2 FF, but neither one was recovered.

holdman looked okay, and i wasn't against keeping him (cheap depth), but he was definately terrible last year.
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.21408 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25