|
| |||||||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-05-2006, 08:58 PM
| #61 |
| Special Teams  Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 183
| Re: What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game? All recievers drop balls. I am glad someone shows disgust in the way the Redskins are playing. |
|  |
| Advertisements |
|
12-05-2006, 09:59 PM
| #62 |
| The Starter  Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Northern,Va.
Posts: 2,126
| Re: What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game? Why would anyone expect these two wr's to put up big numbers here , when they have not done it in Sf and Pittsburgh ? Loyd is only good for a few deep passes a year , and R El averaged around 35 catches / year . They screwed up trading a 3rd and 4th for loyd . |
|
| |
|
12-05-2006, 10:02 PM
| #63 | |
| Franchise Player  Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 34
Posts: 8,317
| Re: What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game? Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
12-06-2006, 06:39 AM
| #64 | |
| Special Teams Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: :::head tilt:::™ "A state of confusion?" lol Age: 43
Posts: 101
| Re: What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game? Quote:
Needless to say, there was probably 300 fans who witnessed the ordeal. A few spectators cracked jokes, saying that his car must be on a lease program and based on the teams preformance this year, he can't afford to pay for any scratches.
__________________ To err is human, .... to do it as a blonde is divine! | |
|
| |
|
12-06-2006, 12:05 PM
| #65 | |
| Franchise Player  Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 8,105
| Re: What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game? Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
12-06-2006, 12:38 PM
| #66 | |
| Gamebreaker  Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 34
Posts: 14,884
| Re: What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game? Quote:
Looks = 53 Receptions = 20 Catch % = 38% Sure, not ALL of them were drops, but quite a few were and some can also be attributed to missing routes, not being able to get open or miscommunication that could be his fault or the QBs, or both. In comparison, Santana Moss this year (with the same QBs): Looks = 71 Receptions = 41 Catch % = 58% Cooley (who we know has been dropping passes): Looks = 67 Receptions = 37 Catch % = 55% Randel El (who gets a lot of handoffs instead of passes): Looks = 39 Receptions = 22 Catch % = 56% Ladell Betts (receiving): Looks = 47 Receptions = 40 Catch % = 85% As you can see, Lloyd's catch % is WAY below everyone else's. It can't be the QB's problem because everyone else is about equal, except for Betts because most of his passes are shorter since he's coming out of the backfield. *Stats calculated by Buster  | |
|
| |
|
12-07-2006, 12:49 PM
| #67 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 34
Posts: 14,884
| Re: What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game? ^ Thread killer. Oops!  |
|
| |
|
12-07-2006, 12:55 PM
| #68 |
| Mad Men   Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,105
| Re: What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game? Buster, how do you factor in things like if the ball was headed in Lloyd's direction but sailed out of bounds, or was intercepted before it got to him? Those would count as looks right, but shouldn't as drops I don't think.
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
| |
|
12-07-2006, 12:57 PM
| #69 |
| Playmaker  Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
| Re: What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game? Even Brunell had a pissed look on his face several weeks back when he threw to Loyd & he didn't adjust to the ball. It looked like MB was mad that he didn't complete the route. Good route running is hard work & often requires precision on the part of wr & qb. Speed & hands get wr's into the nfl, but route running separates the good ones from the rest. I just don't think Loyd looks like he's in sync w/coverages & his responsiblities. Maybe a yr. in the system will change that. |
|
| |
|
12-07-2006, 01:04 PM
| #70 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
| Re: What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game? Quote:
It seems like whenever we throw to him good things happen. There was a thread a few weeks ago that eluded to this, i believe. It just doesn't seem like Lloyd gets many catchable balls his way. | |
|
| |
|
12-07-2006, 01:32 PM
| #71 | |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 34
Posts: 14,884
| Re: What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game? Quote:
The stat that he's only catching about half of the throws of everyone else is just alarming. It CAN'T be a fluke. | |
|
| |
|
12-07-2006, 02:22 PM
| #72 | |
| Mad Men Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,105
| Re: What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game? Quote:
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You | |
|
| |
|
12-07-2006, 02:40 PM
| #73 |
| Impact Rookie  Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC Age: 28
Posts: 937
| Re: What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game? He is our downfield guy, he only get midrange and deep looks, while moss and randle el get a lot more short balls, so the % may be skewed, but still, very bad % on his part.
__________________ Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
|
| |
|
12-07-2006, 04:33 PM
| #74 | |
| Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2006 Age: 56
Posts: 267
| Re: What was the LLoyd vs ARE arguement about at the end of the game? Out of curiosity, do you know what this stat is for Thrash? (Patten hasn't played enough to be of interest.) Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
