|
| |||||||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-10-2006, 02:21 PM
| #1 |
| Special Teams  Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 331
| Adam Archuletta I cant remember if this is true or not, but I think lovie Smith really wanted Adam to become a Bear this year. Do you think that despite his situation this year, Adam could still be considered an impact player and traded for a good price to someone like the Bears? |
|  |
| Advertisements |
|
12-10-2006, 02:30 PM
| #2 |
| \m/   Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 73,194
| Re: Adam Archuletta Traded with his current contract? Yeah right. He's got zero value, especially considering we're going to cut him in all likelihood. |
|
| |
|
12-10-2006, 02:34 PM
| #3 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
| Re: Adam Archuletta Not bad money for a year's worth of work. |
|
| |
|
12-10-2006, 02:40 PM
| #4 |
| The Starter  Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Austin, Texas Age: 43
Posts: 2,001
| Re: Adam Archuletta He has looked good blocking on punts today...
__________________ "Work Harder: millions on welfare are counting on you" - Obama 2009 address to Congress. |
|
| |
|
12-10-2006, 02:51 PM
| #5 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
| Re: Adam Archuletta It's funny when that's the best you can say about the highest paid S in the league. Or sad. I'm not sure which yet. |
|
| |
|
12-10-2006, 03:05 PM
| #6 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 331
| Re: Adam Archuletta I don't think he's that bad of a player, I think that if we didn't have ST, he would be the main safety, but you cant have two captains commanding one ship. I just thought that maybe someone else would see that and want him. I think that someone would be at least willing to give up a 4th rounder for him because they wouldnt pick up the signing bonus on his contract. But then again I havent been following football seriously for more than a year now, so I dont know how theses situations normally work out. |
|
| |
|
12-10-2006, 03:09 PM
| #7 | |
| Fighting off The Crazies  Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Virginia Beach Age: 39
Posts: 5,280
| Re: Adam Archuletta Quote:
Too bad you don't work for the Bears personnel department. | |
|
| |
|
12-10-2006, 04:03 PM
| #8 | |
| Thank You, Sean.   Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Gaithersburg, MD Age: 27
Posts: 7,378
| Re: Adam Archuletta Quote:
In all seriousness, I think our best option with Adam is to try to maneuver a position switch. I still think hes a good football player, hes just not a good saftey. I think if you can bring him up to maybe play some weak side LB or somthing like that, it could be a good chance.
__________________ #21 | |
|
| |
|
12-10-2006, 04:29 PM
| #9 |
| No new threads for you Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,959
| Re: Adam Archuletta Adam (fart)chuletta......at linebacker WHAHAHAHAHAHAHA do u really think he could help the d anymore than he already has? :P Bench him... |
|
| |
|
12-10-2006, 04:33 PM
| #10 |
| Impact Rookie  Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 589
| Re: Adam Archuletta We should just ask him to redo his contract since im pretty sure he wants to play then we could trade him to the bears or we could give him like $4 million and tell him to leave us alone
__________________ give me food, feed me lunch 'you want water?', B#### give me punch - D12 |
|
| |
|
12-10-2006, 04:34 PM
| #11 |
| MVP  Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 51
Posts: 10,448
| Re: Adam Archuletta there was a reason that the skins brought him here. i say give him at least one more year to see if we can utilize him the right way
__________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
| |
|
12-10-2006, 04:44 PM
| #12 |
| What will Shanny do this offseason?  Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,925
| Re: Adam Archuletta i think he is a victum of the secondary not meeting together
__________________ Let's win games now...PLEASE |
|
| |
|
12-10-2006, 04:48 PM
| #13 |
| Special Teams  Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Phoenix, AZ Age: 39
Posts: 410
| Re: Adam Archuletta Archuletta has only been effective as a safety in the NFL when he's the 8th man in the box. He's not the right match with Taylor. The secondary and Taylor play better when the opposite safety is more of a coverage guy.
__________________ "At night there is no such thing as an ugly woman." Ovid (43 B.C.- A.D. 17) |
|
| |
|
12-10-2006, 04:54 PM
| #14 | ||
| Karma Chameleon (I come and go)  Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Annapolis, MD Age: 28
Posts: 3,061
| Re: Adam Archuletta Quote:
__________________ Quote:
| ||
|
| |
|
12-10-2006, 06:36 PM
| #15 | |
| Franchise Player  Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: 31 Spooner St. Age: 38
Posts: 9,534
| Re: Adam Archuletta Quote:
I feel we are all down on Arch because he hasn't fit our mold and we've asked him to do waaaay too much in pass coverage. Adam has NEVER been a great pass defender, he's a run stopper. He'd be great in our system if we actually had CB's and a safty that liked to pass protect as well. Taylor and Arch together was not a good idea. Ronnie Lott was one of the best hitters in all the NFL, but he played pass defense. Both our safties don't do both. I actually like the idea of moving him to LB. (someone brought that up) He loves to hit the hole and knock people senseless. He has good speed (not great) and his size is 6'0" 223 lbs, Zach Thomas is 5'11" 228. Not a big difference. With our HORRIBLE lb's (minus Washington) we could use him!!!
__________________ Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin | |
|
| |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
