Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-05-2007, 10:54 PM   #16
Special Teams
 
DGreene28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 335
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

We share the name except I spell it with an E... I'm in Farmington with 50. How about yourself?
__________________
Optimism can make you look stupid, but cynicism always makes you look cynical. - Calum Fisher
DGreene28 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-05-2007, 10:59 PM   #17
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,967
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by DGreene28 View Post
We share the name except I spell it with an E... I'm in Farmington with 50. How about yourself?
I figured as much. I'm in Meriden, just off 691

I just sent you a PM
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 11:05 PM   #18
Franchise Player
 
ArtMonkDrillz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 32
Posts: 8,011
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I figured as much. I'm in Meriden, just off 691

I just sent you a PM
Looks like that Love Boat avatar is already starting to pay off



(that's right, I have the sense of humor of a middle schooler, you wanna fight about it?)
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude
ArtMonkDrillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 11:40 PM   #19
Impact Rookie
 
CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: va
Age: 47
Posts: 890
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

mcmichael would be a good back up to cooley if anything ever happen to him. but it would have to be a bargain contract or hardly any signing bonus. Need to find a guard or dlineman.
CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 12:30 AM   #20
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 83,509
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

McMichael is one of the better receiving TEs in the league, no way he's even on our radar.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 12:36 AM   #21
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 26
Posts: 15,994
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

I always like TE depth. I feel like you can never have enough good TEs. I've just never liked McMichael. He's a subpar blocker, has character issues, and is even overrated at what he does well--catching the football.

Graham would be so much more enticing its not even funny.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 12:42 AM   #22
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 25
Posts: 12,230
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by dall-assblows View Post
1 question: what kind of fish will be be frying?

i always liked salmon
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0

This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI

Awesome isn't it.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 12:45 AM   #23
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 25
Posts: 12,230
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
For the record I agree. Just curious what the board thinks. I think the only additions we should make on offense are on the line. Some say our WR corps needs to be upgraded, I say they need more time together

But McMichael can definitely play, just shouldn't be our priority

add me to the like him but dont go after him club way more needs than him and he is looking to make big money i say before we sign a new tight end we should extend colley's contract
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0

This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI

Awesome isn't it.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 02:06 AM   #24
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 32
Posts: 16,279
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

he'd immediately be the #2 here. I think he's good, but if its over 1mill per, we've got other needs to save for.
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 06:25 AM   #25
Camp Scrub
 
Aussie_Skins_Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 61
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

I doubt he would even want to be here. If he came here, he shouldn't get great money and wouldn't get a start ahead of Cooley (Who will make the Pro Bowl this year, thats my 'lead pipe lock'). So i don't think that makes a very attractive option for him, or us.
__________________
Even from the other side of the world, i still HAIL!
Aussie_Skins_Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 10:47 AM   #26
Special Teams
 
Rajmahal33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 478
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

McMichael is more of a razzle dazzle kind of player, whereas we need a garbage man. The one thing that he could provide for this team is that he would give JC a big target in the end zone on goal line sets. We currently don't have a tall receiver and McMichael was always great in the red zone at Miami. Still i agree that we shouldn't go after him unless its a real bargain. We need a blocker to seal the ends on those counter plays and such.
__________________
McNasty FTW!
Rajmahal33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 12:03 PM   #27
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,261
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

He has killed at least 3 of my fantasy teams with his late season disappearing acts.

Let someone throw 30 million at him (hopefully the Cowboys or Niners) so we can laugh.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 12:22 PM   #28
King of the Cage
 
Jamaican'Skin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Age: 28
Posts: 2,352
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Don't think he's worth our time. He's not needed, and he's not gonna get paid to block. I think the FO is making smart moves this offseason, and this will be one they shy away from
__________________
Back like a spinal tap
Jamaican'Skin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 12:56 PM   #29
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

would be nice, but not for the likely price
Sign Yoder & draft a TE in rnd. 6 or 7.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 01:25 PM   #30
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 35
Posts: 16,275
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Nope, Cooley's our man for TE pass-catching.

We need a blocking-monster for our other TE. How will Yoder do this year in that role?
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.26385 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25