Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-05-2007, 07:18 PM   #1
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,789
Randy McMichael Might Be Available

So the inevitable question is should we consider going after him?

ESPN.com - NFL - Report: Dolphins to release tight end McMichael
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-05-2007, 07:22 PM   #2
Franchise Player
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 9,961
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

I say no. We have bigger fish to fry.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 07:23 PM   #3
Karma Chameleon (I come and go)
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Annapolis, MD
Age: 30
Posts: 3,088
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

He might not be a need, but he'd be a nice luxury. I've always liked him, outside of his domestic disputes, I like the way he plays.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack
Albert Connell is perhaps the worst Redskin I ever had the misfortune of meeting. He's the kind of guy that makes media people covering their favorite team growing up no longer like that team
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 07:24 PM   #4
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,789
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
I say no. We have bigger fish to fry.
For the record I agree. Just curious what the board thinks. I think the only additions we should make on offense are on the line. Some say our WR corps needs to be upgraded, I say they need more time together

But McMichael can definitely play, just shouldn't be our priority
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 07:30 PM   #5
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 40
Posts: 5,293
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
For the record I agree. Just curious what the board thinks. I think the only additions we should make on offense are on the line. Some say our WR corps needs to be upgraded, I say they need more time together

But McMichael can definitely play, just shouldn't be our priority
Count me in with the "no thanks" crowd. Many people say we need another tight end. I don't agree. There aren't many double TE sets in Saunders' offense anyway.

Get a blocking TE through undrafted free agency, that should do it for us.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 07:59 PM   #6
The Starter
 
dall-assblows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: round the way
Age: 31
Posts: 2,211
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
I say no. We have bigger fish to fry.
1 question: what kind of fish will be be frying?
__________________
SOMEBODY PINCH ME
dall-assblows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:05 PM   #7
The Starter
 
NM Redskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,009
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

I figured if we did go after a free agent TE it would be more of a blocker than catching TE.
__________________
Despite my solid 40 time and great intangibles I went undrafted AGAIN!
NM Redskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:18 PM   #8
Special Teams
 
BeastsoftheNFCeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 331
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Although having McMichael would be cool, I say we shouldn't get him. But him just being on the market is good for us. It means that other TE's values go down because there is now more and better options than them, and it also means that those people searching for TE's might potentially get McMichael instead of a guy that we want to target.
BeastsoftheNFCeast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:24 PM   #9
Playmaker
 
skinsfan_nn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 49
Posts: 4,495
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

I hope we can sign Yoder fairly cheap. This guy is a solid blocker and can catch very well. I hope they give this guy a shot, he could be a solid backup to the Capt........COOOOOLEY!

McMichael, to low on the priority list.
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68

THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE!
skinsfan_nn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:25 PM   #10
The Starter
 
RMSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 26
Posts: 1,066
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

McMichael might be looking for a pretty big contract as well, and plus we have bigger needs to address.
RMSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:48 PM   #11
Camp Scrub
 
Bbaker24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 38
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

he's going to be looking to come in as the starter...but if he is willing to sign a 1 year deal to serve as the backup then lets do it
Bbaker24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:58 PM   #12
Playmaker
 
skinsfan_nn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 49
Posts: 4,495
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bbaker24 View Post
he's going to be looking to come in as the starter...but if he is willing to sign a 1 year deal to serve as the backup then lets do it
I doubt he's lookin at one year? He's definitely isn't looking for backup cash. McMichael can play!

Don't NEED to be wasting cash on a upper end TE. We have other areas of higher concern.
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68

THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE!
skinsfan_nn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 09:00 PM   #13
Special Teams
 
Crat92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nashville,TN
Age: 40
Posts: 474
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Could someone please tell me why all the hu-bub about a blocking TE in this offense?
__________________
BEWARE THE MIDDLE............LaRON LANDRY IS LURKING!
Crat92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 09:44 PM   #14
Special Teams
 
DGreene28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 335
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by NM Redskin View Post
I figured if we did go after a free agent TE it would be more of a blocker than catching TE.

True Cooley is not a great blocker... McMicheal is even worse, we need at least one decent blocking TE. Plus McMicheal will make some bank in FA.
__________________
Optimism can make you look stupid, but cynicism always makes you look cynical. - Calum Fisher
DGreene28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 09:49 PM   #15
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,789
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by DGreene28 View Post
True Cooley is not a great blocker... McMicheal is even worse, we need at least one decent blocking TE. Plus McMicheal will make some bank in FA.
Welcome to the board

Why'd you put an "e" at the end of Green?

Where in CT do you live?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.28381 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25