The latest on Briggs: Bears want more

firstdown · 04-02-2007, 02:26 PM

I'd say the Briggs thread count is catching up to the Brunell, Ramsey, Lavar thread counts. I'm even thinking of a new slant to this so I can start a thread.

skinsfan242 · 04-02-2007, 02:30 PM

Say "you want Marshall? Throw in the 38th pick in addition to the 31st and we have a deal", if they say "no", say "have a nice day, call us if you change your mind, enjoy your LB sitting out." If only the FO were this smart.

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 04-02-2007, 02:39 PM

Here is the thing that gets to me we claim that we need defensive line help yet we have brought in 0 free agents i dont get that ian scott is still out there played solid for the bears and he is 25 years old and i know that the FO wanted briggs before we traded AA so why didnt we bring him up then dumb move by us and this is what the trade should look like if we give up marshall

bears get:
6th pick
marshall

redskins get:
31st pick
lance briggs
2nd rd pick 37th overall
we have leverage why not use it for once GOD

but right now i think we should keep the pick sign ian scott before the draft and take either gaines adams or laron landry damn skins u messed up on this one

I know i am not the only one who feels that they screwed up here

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 04-02-2007, 02:43 PM

Earthquake,

I come to you as a friend. Using really big font, all caps, etc. will not make more people read your posts. Nope, it will just make people angry, or at the very least annoyed.

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 04-02-2007, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha

Earthquake,

I come to you as a friend. Using really big font, all caps, etc. will not make more people read your posts. Nope, it will just make people angry, or at the very least annoyed.

i know it is just i never made any posts that big before i just thought it would be funny to go big and then at the end make it small i didnt mean anything by it

Mattyk · 04-02-2007, 02:46 PM

Let's be clear that it's the Bears that want more, the Redskins aren't offering more.

Yet.

Hog1 · 04-02-2007, 02:52 PM

As of today, I hate THAT word!..................BANNED

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 04-02-2007, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog1

As of today, I hate THAT word!..................BANNED

why

AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace · 04-02-2007, 03:14 PM

this trade gets dumber by the minute...and so we're more likely to do it...maybe they can throw in some magic beans

12thMan · 04-02-2007, 03:16 PM

I'm more amazed at how many different threads about the same topic can get past 2 and 3 pgs so easily.

Drift Reality · 04-02-2007, 03:31 PM

If we trade #6 and McIntosh for Briggs and the #29, I am going to become a New England Patriots fan until Dan Snyder is banned from the NFL for making under-the-table deals with Drew Rosenhaus.

Hog1 · 04-02-2007, 03:33 PM

That's Humor

skinsfan69 · 04-02-2007, 03:51 PM

I'm tired of this whole Briggs thing. I wish someone would pull the plug on it.
We don't need the guy. And we especially don't need to pay his ass 20 mil. in guar. money. What we need to do is call Cooley's agent and resign him to a long term deal.

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooo tired of chasing other teams players. It's getting older than dirt. Somebody call Floyd Reese.

freddyg12 · 04-02-2007, 03:53 PM

What's annoyed me about the comments on this trade has been that people (including in this article) are saying the deal is in the Bears favor.
Despite what any draft point system says, on paper this is a really good deal for us, we get 2 players & they get 1.

However, I'm worried about this deal for team chemistry & cap reasons. If we throw in another player, this deal doesn't even look good on paper.

I hope Denver's signing Bly doesn't bust their cap space to the point that they don't want the #6 anymore. They have the picks to offer.

skinsfan69 · 04-02-2007, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12thMan

I'm more amazed at how many different threads about the same topic can get past 2 and 3 pgs so easily.

This topic has been beaten into the ground. Isn't there something else to talk about? It's Masters week.

04-02-2007, 02:26 PM	#16
firstdown Living Legend Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: chesapeake, va Age: 49 Posts: 15,198	Re: The latest on Briggs: Bears want more I'd say the Briggs thread count is catching up to the Brunell, Ramsey, Lavar thread counts. I'm even thinking of a new slant to this so I can start a thread.

04-02-2007, 02:30 PM	#17
skinsfan242 Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 152	Re: The latest on Briggs: Bears want more Say "you want Marshall? Throw in the 38th pick in addition to the 31st and we have a deal", if they say "no", say "have a nice day, call us if you change your mind, enjoy your LB sitting out." If only the FO were this smart.

04-02-2007, 02:39 PM	#18
EARTHQUAKE2689 You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24 Posts: 11,005	Re: The latest on Briggs: Bears want more Here is the thing that gets to me we claim that we need defensive line help yet we have brought in 0 free agents i dont get that ian scott is still out there played solid for the bears and he is 25 years old and i know that the FO wanted briggs before we traded AA so why didnt we bring him up then dumb move by us and this is what the trade should look like if we give up marshall bears get: 6th pick marshall redskins get: 31st pick lance briggs 2nd rd pick 37th overall we have leverage why not use it for once GOD but right now i think we should keep the pick sign ian scott before the draft and take either gaines adams or laron landry damn skins u messed up on this one I know i am not the only one who feels that they screwed up here __________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it.

04-02-2007, 02:43 PM	#19
Sheriff Gonna Getcha Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 34 Posts: 8,317	Re: The latest on Briggs: Bears want more Earthquake, I come to you as a friend. Using really big font, all caps, etc. will not make more people read your posts. Nope, it will just make people angry, or at the very least annoyed.

04-02-2007, 02:46 PM	#21
Mattyk ‎\m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40 Posts: 72,693	Re: The latest on Briggs: Bears want more Let's be clear that it's the Bears that want more, the Redskins aren't offering more. Yet. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

04-02-2007, 02:52 PM	#22
Hog1 Quietly Dominating the East Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Naples, Florida Posts: 8,375	Re: The latest on Briggs: Bears want more As of today, I hate THAT word!..................BANNED __________________ Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... Win! Always win! By fair means or foul, by soft words and hard deeds... by treachery, by cunning, by malpractice... but always win--Edward Teach

04-02-2007, 03:14 PM	#24
AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace Impact Rookie Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Fayetteville, NC Age: 28 Posts: 896	Re: The latest on Briggs: Bears want more this trade gets dumber by the minute...and so we're more likely to do it...maybe they can throw in some magic beans

04-02-2007, 03:16 PM	#25
12thMan MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C. Posts: 11,363	Re: The latest on Briggs: Bears want more I'm more amazed at how many different threads about the same topic can get past 2 and 3 pgs so easily.

04-02-2007, 03:31 PM	#26
Drift Reality Impact Rookie Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 505	Re: The latest on Briggs: Bears want more If we trade #6 and McIntosh for Briggs and the #29, I am going to become a New England Patriots fan until Dan Snyder is banned from the NFL for making under-the-table deals with Drew Rosenhaus. __________________ Drift Reality DC City Blog New Influencer

04-02-2007, 03:33 PM	#27
Hog1 Quietly Dominating the East Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Naples, Florida Posts: 8,375	Re: The latest on Briggs: Bears want more That's Humor __________________ Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... Win! Always win! By fair means or foul, by soft words and hard deeds... by treachery, by cunning, by malpractice... but always win--Edward Teach

04-02-2007, 03:51 PM	#28
skinsfan69 Franchise Player Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arlington, VA. Posts: 8,105	Re: The latest on Briggs: Bears want more I'm tired of this whole Briggs thing. I wish someone would pull the plug on it. We don't need the guy. And we especially don't need to pay his ass 20 mil. in guar. money. What we need to do is call Cooley's agent and resign him to a long term deal. Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooo tired of chasing other teams players. It's getting older than dirt. Somebody call Floyd Reese.

04-02-2007, 03:53 PM	#29
freddyg12 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 4,540	Re: The latest on Briggs: Bears want more What's annoyed me about the comments on this trade has been that people (including in this article) are saying the deal is in the Bears favor. Despite what any draft point system says, on paper this is a really good deal for us, we get 2 players & they get 1. However, I'm worried about this deal for team chemistry & cap reasons. If we throw in another player, this deal doesn't even look good on paper. I hope Denver's signing Bly doesn't bust their cap space to the point that they don't want the #6 anymore. They have the picks to offer.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

The latest on Briggs: Bears want more

Redskins Locker Room