Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Nickel might be familiar in the future

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-03-2007, 07:31 PM   #1
Special Teams
 
BeastsoftheNFCeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 331
Nickel might be familiar in the future

I was just thinking, that with 2 allstar tacklers at safety, and how GW thinks that pressure on the QB is helped out by good coverage, that we will see alot of nickle packages next year. One of the safeties will essentially play linebacker when we are in nickle packages.
BeastsoftheNFCeast is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 05-03-2007, 07:37 PM   #2
Playmaker
 
70Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 43
Posts: 3,048
Re: Nickle might be framiliar in the future

Defensive personell is dictated by the offensive personell.
(3 WR = Nickel)
(4WR = Dime)
(5WR = Quarter aka, the hated 3 man rush)

But, Williams does march to the beat of his own tuba player, so you may be right. It would be a good base package against the Eagles, for instance.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven
70Chip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 07:37 PM   #3
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 36
Posts: 5,829
Re: Nickel might be framiliar in the future

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeastsoftheNFCeast View Post
I was just thinking, that with 2 allstar tacklers at safety, and how GW thinks that pressure on the QB is helped out by good coverage, that we will see alot of nickle packages next year. One of the safeties will essentially play linebacker when we are in nickle packages.
You are thinking too hard, but I like it!

1-4-6 DEFENSE BABY! WAHOO!
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 07:54 PM   #4
Playmaker
 
skinsfan_nn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 49
Posts: 4,495
Re: Nickel might be framiliar in the future

One allstar, one wanna be? Hasen't played up here yet, a little different. But good point.
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68

THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE!
skinsfan_nn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 07:56 PM   #5
The Starter
 
GoSkins!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 45
Posts: 1,587
Re: Nickel might be framiliar in the future

Quote:
Originally Posted by angryssg View Post
You are thinking too hard, but I like it!

1-4-6 DEFENSE BABY! WAHOO!
I think I actually saw the Pats run a 0-5-6 defense once. I can't remember if it was preseason or what, but it was the craziest thing. Not a single d-lineman.
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien
GoSkins! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 08:12 PM   #6
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,261
Re: Nickel might be framiliar in the future

We should play nickel. We have 4 starting calibre corners and Stoutmire is a pretty good nickel/dime guy.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 08:33 PM   #7
Special Teams
 
BeastsoftheNFCeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 331
Re: Nickel might be framiliar in the future

Also, I forgot to add that Rogers, Springs, and Smoot (probably MaClin too but I dunno bout him) are all solid against the run.
BeastsoftheNFCeast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 08:38 PM   #8
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 52
Posts: 10,515
Re: Nickel might be framiliar in the future

with all the secondary players on the field at once, how do you suggest the skins get to the qback? you can only cover NFL receivers for so long
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 08:52 PM   #9
Special Teams
 
jrocx69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas
Age: 33
Posts: 461
Re: Nickle might be framiliar in the future

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70Chip View Post
Defensive personell is dictated by the offensive personell.
(3 WR = Nickel)
(4WR = Dime)
(5WR = Quarter aka, the hated 3 man rush)

But, Williams does march to the beat of his own tuba player, so you may be right. It would be a good base package against the Eagles, for instance.
thats called madden
jrocx69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 09:07 PM   #10
Wildcard Bitches
 
RobH4413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 29
Posts: 2,487
Re: Nickle might be framiliar in the future

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrocx69 View Post
thats called madden
No, He knows what he's talking about.

You need DB's on all of your WR's because other wise slow linebackers will be guarding them. Bad news.
__________________
This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps!
RobH4413 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 09:11 PM   #11
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,261
Re: Nickel might be framiliar in the future

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25 View Post
with all the secondary players on the field at once, how do you suggest the skins get to the qback? you can only cover NFL receivers for so long
A properly working G-dub defense is going to blitz the corners and safeties. Taylor also gives you versatility since he is essentially another linebacker. That being said, the D-line needs to generate some pressure on it's own.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2007, 02:59 PM   #12
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 35
Posts: 16,275
Re: Nickel might be framiliar in the future

We should just play a half-dollar zone on every play.

Taylor, Landry, Smoot, Springs, Rogers, Jimoh and Prioleau, with Washington, McIntosh, Marshall and a Sartz/Blades rotation.
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2007, 03:26 PM   #13
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
Re: Nickel might be framiliar in the future

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
We should just play a half-dollar zone on every play.

Taylor, Landry, Smoot, Springs, Rogers, Jimoh and Prioleau, with Washington, McIntosh, Marshall and a Sartz/Blades rotation.
your leaving out mr. fletcher.
__________________
Hail to Allen/Shanahan .... bring in some baby hogs and load up on diesel fuel !!! (budw38)
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2007, 10:01 PM   #14
Special Teams
 
CPAlltheWay012's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: B-Town
Posts: 164
Re: Nickel might be framiliar in the future

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfeskins View Post
your leaving out mr. fletcher.
and mr. stoutmire :P
CPAlltheWay012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2007, 10:15 PM   #15
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 25
Posts: 11,908
Re: Nickel might be framiliar in the future

Quote:
Originally Posted by CPAlltheWay012 View Post
and mr. stoutmire :P

and vincent kennedy mcmahon UR FIRED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0

This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI

Awesome isn't it.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.26581 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25