Home | Forums | Shop | Donate

Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room

Best Offseason

Redskins Locker Room

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-19-2007, 03:32 PM   #61
I like big (_|_)s.
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Posts: 18,881
Re: Best Offseason

Those are actually very good and valid points.

I can only say though that while the offseason doesn't always predict future success, you can at least argue what you "think". This is why we discuss.
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 06-19-2007, 07:44 PM   #62
Franchise Player
jsarno's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Posts: 9,534
Re: Best Offseason

Originally Posted by skinsfan242 View Post
I think it is amazing when you say best offseason people keep turning to money spent and big names. If you have ever seen the Redskins (you obviously have) you know that doesn't work.

The Redskins attacked their weaknesses and got almost every player they wanted. Only a few, (Pettigout, Davis, Dockery), slipped through the cracks, but they all got way to much money.

I don't know about you but one thing you need to realize is the coaches know best. They see these players everyday, last year they said we only rushed three players because the secondary was so banged up. Our LB's were all hurt. Are biggest playmaker missed on offsense missed 10 games. Our QB stunk.

So if you talk about improvement and attacking areas of weakness, I don't see a team who did a better job. Patriots signed 5 WR's, didn't we try that last year? Cleveland got two first rounders, so what. San Fran paid out the a*s for a couple of players? I've seen that before.

Let's look at this; Colts win the SB, did they sign anybody that offseason? Patriots have never signed anyone big in the offseason before so who knows.

In 2004 the Skins didn't sign anyone big, they went to the playoffs the following year, then they sign everyone, they go 5-11. See a trend.

So let's not play the headline game because we know it doesn't work. If you want to look at headlines, we didn't have the best offseason, but i think we improved our team the most overall this offseason.
You make very good points, but every team can't draft superstars and sometimes need free agents. But in general I agree with your comments.
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 01:51 AM   #63
You did WHAT?!?
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Posts: 13,279
Re: Best Offseason

the off-season is so overrated wait till december to see who had the best off-season

This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills.


Awesome isn't it.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.04517 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25