The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   The Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room
Reload this Page **UPDATE**: Vick Not Likely to Be Indicted Following Raid
Register Forum Rules FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read


**UPDATE**: Vick Not Likely to Be Indicted Following Raid

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2007, 03:33 PM   #16
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,202
Re: Federal Agents Raid Vick's Property
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I think he'll get cut at seasons end because it allows the Falcons to rid themselves of a player who is hindering their offense while satisfing the PR side of the game.
I don't believe Vick is going anywhere soon due to the salary cap hit, it would be over $ 16 million this season. If the Falcons do release him at some point it would probably be after June 1, 2008 when the hit would be lower and could be spread over 2008 & 2009 caps.
__________________
...[If] an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything]....you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 07-06-2007, 04:53 PM   #17
Camp Scrub
 
dallass-blows 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 67
Re: Federal Agents Raid Vick's Property
we Should sign him!!!!!!!!!!



yay!
__________________
"I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me." - Hunter S. Thompson
dallass-blows 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2007, 06:15 PM   #18
Playmaker
 
skinsfan_nn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 48
Posts: 4,495
Re: Federal Agents Raid Vick's Property
The evening news in Hampton Roads, on the vick property.

Searchers back at Vick's Surry Co. property | TOP STORIES | WVEC.com | News for Hampton Roads, Virginia
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68

THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE!
skinsfan_nn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2007, 06:45 PM   #19
Franchise Player
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 8,103
Re: Federal Agents Raid Vick's Property
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I think he'll get cut at seasons end because it allows the Falcons to rid themselves of a player who is hindering their offense while satisfing the PR side of the game.
I don't think Vick is going anywhere. I don't think he is ever going to be a 65% passer. That is not his strength. That's also not what makes a good QB. Some guys, like Ben R. McNabb, Vince Young and Vick are playmakers, not pure pocket guys. He doesn't turn it over that much and he does not have good WR's so keep that in mind too. But he has gotten his team to the NFC Champ, Div round and made a Pro Bowl or two. Alot of guys in the NFL have not done that. So far IMO he is a middle of the pack NFL QB.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007, 12:05 AM   #20
Mad Men
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,098
Re: **UPDATE**: Vick Not Likely to Be Indicted Following Raid
Here's an update

ESPN - Sources: Vick unlikely to be indicted in feds' probe - NFL
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007, 12:10 AM   #21
Banned
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 4,261
Re: Federal Agents Raid Vick's Property
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I think he'll get cut at seasons end because it allows the Falcons to rid themselves of a player who is hindering their offense while satisfing the PR side of the game.
So you really think they are going to cut arguably the most popular player in the league?

The man hasn't been charged with a single thing and people are talking about him being released.

And I am the one characterized as an "alarmist fool" for sharing the viewpoint of the beat reporter and one of top sportswriters in the country. Funny how things are viewed around here...
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007, 12:50 AM   #22
Pro Bowl
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 34
Posts: 5,823
Re: **UPDATE**: Vick Not Likely to Be Indicted Following Raid
Vick isnt going anywhere. He has too many high priced lawyers with lack of evidence on their side. Remember you can only be convicted if the evidence is concrete. In other words the FEDS have no case.
__________________
Read "The Book", life will gain meaning.
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007, 01:24 AM   #23
Eternally Legendary
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 33
Posts: 9,734
Re: **UPDATE**: Vick Not Likely to Be Indicted Following Raid
This whole is starting to smell bad. Why are the Feds involved in the whole Vick thing? Isn't this usually a state matter and as such handled by local law enforcement?
__________________
RG3, RGIII, RG三, RG३, RGγʹ, RGג, RG٣, RG๓, RG..., RG셋, RGԳ!
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007, 01:27 AM   #24
Pro Bowl
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 34
Posts: 5,823
Re: **UPDATE**: Vick Not Likely to Be Indicted Following Raid
Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
This whole is starting to smell bad. Why are the Feds involved in the whole Vick thing? Isn't this usually a state matter and as such handled by local law enforcement?

It became a Federal matter when Federal Laws were broke, and when a Non Virginia resident became subject to a Virginia state investigation.
__________________
Read "The Book", life will gain meaning.
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007, 01:52 AM   #25
Mad Men
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,098
Re: **UPDATE**: Vick Not Likely to Be Indicted Following Raid
I wonder if Vick's dogs bulk up like this
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007, 11:29 AM   #26
Playmaker
 
mlmpetert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,207
Re: **UPDATE**: Vick Not Likely to Be Indicted Following Raid
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I wonder if Vick's dogs bulk up like this

Wow that dog is totally sweet. It said that this mutation has happend in a human before, I wonder if they were referring to Colossus?
mlmpetert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007, 11:34 AM   #27
Mad Men
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,098
Re: **UPDATE**: Vick Not Likely to Be Indicted Following Raid
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlmpetert View Post
Wow that dog is totally sweet. It said that this mutation has happend in a human before, I wonder if they were referring to Colossus?
If I'm Bonds, this is my alibi. Genetic mutation!
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007, 11:46 AM   #28
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 38
Posts: 9,534
Re: **UPDATE**: Vick Not Likely to Be Indicted Following Raid
Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
This whole is starting to smell bad. Why are the Feds involved in the whole Vick thing? Isn't this usually a state matter and as such handled by local law enforcement?

You gotta ask youself, "self, how many times have I had feds on my ass?" None...why? Cause I'm a good person. So why does Vick have feds on his ass? (cough cough)
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007, 12:31 PM   #29
Playmaker
 
70Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 42
Posts: 3,048
Wink Re: **UPDATE**: Vick Not Likely to Be Indicted Following Raid
Quote:
Originally Posted by angryssg View Post
Vick isnt going anywhere. He has too many high priced lawyers with lack of evidence on their side. Remember you can only be convicted if the evidence is concrete. In other words the FEDS have no case.
You can only be convicted if the jury votes to convict you. People are found guilty on flimsy evidence every day. Of course, the difference here is that Vick can retain strong legal council and the government will have to have strong evidence against him in order to indict, which is the way it should always be , but isn't.

Also, any jury in that part of Virginia is likely to have at least one person who will vote to acquit Vick no matter what - because of football or race or a combination of things. If the government tried to bring a case against Vick it would have to be airtight. But, he is probably only actually guilty of attending the fights and gambling on them. His cousin is the one who will take the fall for the actual fighting which is the case that the government would like to make even though Micheal Vick is more famous. If they try to bring the dog fighting charges against Micheal Vick, they will be giving a reluctant jury an easy way out - "He just owned the house, He didn't own the dogs, etc". These are the kinds of considerations they are making. Prosecutors hate to lose and they really hate to lose when there are cameras around.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven
70Chip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007, 01:57 PM   #30
Eternally Legendary
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 33
Posts: 9,734
Re: **UPDATE**: Vick Not Likely to Be Indicted Following Raid
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsarno View Post
You gotta ask youself, "self, how many times have I had feds on my ass?" None...why? Cause I'm a good person. So why does Vick have feds on his ass? (cough cough)
I soured on the whole thing when a congressman got involved. That's a big red flag right there.
__________________
RG3, RGIII, RG三, RG३, RGγʹ, RGג, RG٣, RG๓, RG..., RG셋, RGԳ!
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Bookmarks

« In Gus I Trust | Joyner: Reed, Taylor Overrated from Coverage Standpoint »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 AM.

Contact Us - The Warpath: Redskins Fan Site - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.38155 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24