|
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Saden's Team Most Likely to Win their Division Poll | |||
| Miami |     | 9 | 7.89% |
| Cleveland |    | 3 | 2.63% |
| Houston |    | 1 | 0.88% |
| Oakland |    | 1 | 0.88% |
| Detroit |    | 13 | 11.40% |
| Tampa Bay |    | 36 | 31.58% |
| Arizona | | 51 | 44.74% |
| Voters: 114. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-09-2007, 11:23 AM
| #31 |
| I like big (_|_)s.   Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 31
Posts: 17,119
| Re: 2007 Worst to First? Out of the given choices, I'm going to say the Cardinals. The offense is obviously explosive and if their defense can come together, they'll be a good team this year.
__________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|  |
| Advertisements |
|
07-09-2007, 11:24 AM
| #32 | |
| Impact Rookie  Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 928
| Re: 2007 Worst to First? Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
07-09-2007, 11:29 AM
| #33 | |
| \m/   Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,673
| Re: 2007 Worst to First? Quote:
Go ball coach! Click-clack! | |
|
| |
|
07-09-2007, 11:42 AM
| #34 |
| I like big (_|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 31
Posts: 17,119
| Re: 2007 Worst to First? It's CLACKETY-clack. Don't you know anything?! 
__________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
| |
|
07-09-2007, 11:46 AM
| #35 |
| \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,673
| Re: 2007 Worst to First? I love Ashy Larry LOL I'm talking about this click-clack though |
|
| |
|
07-09-2007, 11:49 AM
| #36 |
| I like big (_|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 31
Posts: 17,119
| Re: 2007 Worst to First? HA. I know, that shit kills me. This is "Ball Coach". LOL
__________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
| |
|
07-09-2007, 12:12 PM
| #37 | |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 928
| Re: 2007 Worst to First? Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
07-10-2007, 10:06 AM
| #38 |
| \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,673
| Re: 2007 Worst to First? I went with Houston just to get them on the board. I honestly don't see any of these teams rising up and winning their divisions. |
|
| |
|
07-18-2007, 10:11 AM
| #39 |
| Impact Rookie  Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: St. Louis, MO Age: 57
Posts: 862
| Re: 2007 Worst to First? I only picked Arizona because they play in a sorry division and the "NONE OF THE ABOVE" option wasn't available.
__________________ "HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
|
| |
|
07-18-2007, 02:32 PM
| #40 |
| Camp Scrub  Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Virginia Beach Age: 35
Posts: 16
| Re: 2007 Worst to First? Arizona is the sexy pick again... but I think Seattle and St Loius and even San Fran will disturb any run at the division the try to make... Tampa Bay could make a come back after the bad year they had last year...
__________________ Have Faith & Believe - HAIL! |
|
| |
|
07-18-2007, 02:38 PM
| #41 |
| Franchise Player  Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 30
Posts: 7,757
| Re: 2007 Worst to First? I went with the lions because I think that the NFC North will be such a crappy division this year that anyone could take it. That said, I really hope/think we'll sweep them this season..
__________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
|
| |
|
07-18-2007, 02:49 PM
| #42 | |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Virginia Beach Age: 35
Posts: 16
| Re: 2007 Worst to First? Quote:
I do think we should be able to beat the entire division as well. I don't think Chicago is that great (good - yes, but not great) other than their Defense.... I guess we shall see.
__________________ Have Faith & Believe - HAIL! | |
|
| |
|
07-19-2007, 02:53 PM
| #43 |
| Banned  Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 542
| Re: 2007 Worst to First? i vote none of the above! |
|
| |
|
07-19-2007, 04:49 PM
| #44 |
| Playmaker  Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
| Re: 2007 Worst to First? Detroit. Just ask them.
__________________ There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
|
| |
|
07-20-2007, 02:41 AM
| #45 |
| Franchise Player  Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: 31 Spooner St. Age: 38
Posts: 9,534
| Re: 2007 Worst to First? I picked Cleveland, cause they have talent. However, I do not think that...I would have chose none of the above. I do think Detroit has a better shot than Arizona for the simple fact that the NFC Central is weak, and the bears could easily take a huge dive. An 8-8 team could win that division.
__________________ Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
| |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
