|
| |||||||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-16-2007, 08:34 PM
| #16 | |
| You did WHAT?!?  Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24
Posts: 11,005
| Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings Quote:
(Quake laughs and has a evil smurk.) No game.
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it. | |
|  |
| Advertisements |
|
07-17-2007, 03:13 AM
| #17 |
| Special Teams  Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 272
| Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings Outside of Moss, I am not a fan of our wideouts. Let them prove me wrong. |
|
| |
|
07-17-2007, 07:31 AM
| #18 | |
| Fighting off The Crazies  Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Virginia Beach Age: 39
Posts: 5,280
| Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings Quote:
When you think about it, we haven't had so much as a solid wideout duo since '99 with Westbrook and Connell. Lloyd or Randle El have to step the hell up this year. | |
|
| |
|
07-17-2007, 10:15 AM
| #19 | |
| Playmaker  Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,468
| Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings Quote:
Wow, thanks to this thread I now have an uneasy feeling (temporarily, I'm sure) going into the season. Here's why: WR's after Moss are question marks. Defensive line performance is a question mark. QB production is a question mark. Clinton Portis' health is a question mark. McIntosh's play is a question mark. Washington's health is a question mark (until I see otherwise). Landry at safety is a question mark. Springs health is a question mark. Smoot's on field production is a question mark. Todd Wade is a question mark. Stupid off-season giving me time to dwell on negative crap!
__________________ "I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn | |
|
| |
|
07-17-2007, 10:46 AM
| #20 | |
| Playmaker  Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: 129 W 81st street Age: 33
Posts: 3,502
| Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
07-17-2007, 10:47 AM
| #21 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: 129 W 81st street Age: 33
Posts: 3,502
| Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings I just wish SI would tell me what 5 games we are gonna win this year so I know what tickets to buy. |
|
| |
|
07-17-2007, 01:06 PM
| #22 | |
| Contains football related knowledge  Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Second Star On The Right Age: 50
Posts: 7,144
| Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings Quote:
Now that a Scouts Inc. review I would love to see.
__________________ My Little Pony: Friendship is magic? or ... a repressive matriarchal society where individuals' roles are defined by their immutable physical characteristics and governance is reserved for those who demonstrate the genetic purity of the pony master race? | |
|
| |
|
07-17-2007, 01:59 PM
| #23 |
| The Starter  Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Yorktown, Va Age: 43
Posts: 1,576
| Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings I think that our receivers are set to have a break out year. Here's why: 1. They are no longer learning a new system. 2. The coaches are no longer having to learn what Lloyd and El do best. 3. Lloyd is better suited to the down field throws that we can expect from Campbell more than we could with Brunell. 4. Saunders offense typically lights it up in year 2. 5. see number 4. and add that the previous offenses never needed big name receivers. 6. Chemistry
__________________ Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien |
|
| |
|
07-17-2007, 02:40 PM
| #24 | |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 43
| Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings Quote:
Speaking of the Redskins being bashed on every sports show in America, I don't know if you guys saw it but on Cold Pizza they said "Well its never too early to look forward to next year. So who do you think will be the overall #1 pick in 2008?? Well to figure that out you have to decide who will have the #1 pick and my choice will have to go with the Washington Redskins drafting the DE out of USC". That just makes me laugh. The worst record in the NFL, yeah right. I cant wait for this season to start. | |
|
| |
|
07-17-2007, 03:03 PM
| #25 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,468
| Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings [ECHO]Speaking of the Redskins being bashed on every sports show in America, I don't know if you guys saw it but on Cold Pizza they said "Well its never too early to look forward to next year. So who do you think will be the overall #1 pick in 2008?? Well to figure that out you have to decide who will have the #1 pick and my choice will have to go with the Washington Redskins drafting the DE out of USC". That just makes me laugh. The worst record in the NFL, yeah right. I cant wait for this season to start.[/ECHO] Welcome to the board! Most of us read all of the top threads. No need to post the same message.
__________________ "I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
|
| |
|
07-17-2007, 03:11 PM
| #26 | |
| You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24
Posts: 11,005
| Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings Quote:
Speaking of the Redskins getting bashed.............. j/k funny 724.
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it. | |
|
| |
|
07-17-2007, 04:04 PM
| #27 |
| Playmaker  Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Denver Age: 31
Posts: 2,759
| Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings I think they might be confusing our WR corps, with our QB. We have good talent at WR, they just haven't been able to show it because of our QB situation last year. Not that it matters, but we definitely have a better WR corps than just 10 other teams. I would reason that these teams are just as bad, if not worse. They either have no receiver that can compare to Moss, or they only have 1 comparable receiver, and nobody behind him: 1. Cleveland 2. Houston 3. Jax 4. KC 5. Oakland 6. San Diego 7. Tennessee 8. Carolina 9. Chicago 10. Green Bay 11. Minnesota 12. Philadelphia
__________________ To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered. |
|
| |
|
07-17-2007, 04:20 PM
| #28 | |
| RG Glee  Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 33
Posts: 7,893
| Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings Quote:
I think Campbell will find him a bit more this year and his numbers will look a bit more like they did in San Fran. That said, I still think he's a malcontent and will be a problem for the team at some point this season. The WR talent, and the QB, are both good enough to open up the offense and give Clinton and Ladell the space they need to wreak havoc on the ground. | |
|
| |
|
07-17-2007, 04:28 PM
| #29 |
| Robert Griffin III  Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 32
Posts: 1,495
| Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings I hated seeing LC go back to the Jets. His hands were glue. I would hate to see what we would be ranked with LC here instead of Lloyd.
__________________ Robert Griffin III |
|
| |
|
07-17-2007, 04:36 PM
| #30 | |
| RG Glee Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 33
Posts: 7,893
| Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings Quote:
I'd hate to see what we'd be ranked with LC, Lloyd, and Randle-El instead of Moss, Lloyd, and Randle-El. | |
|
| |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
