Scouts Inc WR rankings

Mattyk · 07-16-2007, 04:06 PM

Link: http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/insid...ory?id=2921051

22. Washington Redskins
Obviously, the Redskins did not get their money's worth with the acquisitions of Antwaan Randle El and Brandon Lloyd. They envisioned a dangerous three-receiver attack with these two and Santana Moss. The truth of the matter is that they still have one excellent wideout in Moss and two players who are much better suited as No. 3 receivers. Moss is small, but he is extremely dangerous when healthy. He can turn a hitch route into a 70-yard touchdown in the blink of an eye and can challenge any secondary deep. The Redskins' quarterback output has been subpar and we expect Jason Campbell to be much improved this season, but they simply have to get more from Randle El and Lloyd.

GusFrerotte · 07-16-2007, 04:10 PM

Hearing that at least Lloyd was working with JC during the offseasson a bit does give hope that he will return to 49er form, which will kick ass and automatically open up things for Randle El and Santana. If they play like last year(Llyod and Randle El), our offense is going to stink it up again. Lloyd is better than Randle El for sure and more of a threat.

jdlea · 07-16-2007, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Link: http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/insid...ory?id=2921051

22. Washington Redskins
Obviously, the Redskins did not get their money's worth with the acquisitions of Antwaan Randle El and Brandon Lloyd. They envisioned a dangerous three-receiver attack with these two and Santana Moss. The truth of the matter is that they still have one excellent wideout in Moss and two players who are much better suited as No. 3 receivers. Moss is small, but he is extremely dangerous when healthy. He can turn a hitch route into a 70-yard touchdown in the blink of an eye and can challenge any secondary deep. The Redskins' quarterback output has been subpar and we expect Jason Campbell to be much improved this season, but they simply have to get more from Randle El and Lloyd.

Based on last season, I would be somewhat inclined to agree with him. HOWEVA, I expect both Randle El and Lloyd to be MUCH improved this season. I think Randle El could very possibly break out and establish himself as a legit #2 and I, personally, love what he brings to the table as a wild card offensively. I think this group will be much better this season with a QB who can stretch the field and a better comfort level with the offense and Jason Campbell.

dmek25 · 07-16-2007, 04:15 PM

im not the ultimate homer, but come on. can anyone name more then 5 or 6 that are better?

D'BOYZ · 07-16-2007, 04:33 PM

based on last year 22 is about right I was really desapointed with Lloyds and randall production I tought they would be better specially Lloyd not so much Randall he's for me a 5 good plays per year player that's all

What spot did dallas was ranked?

RobH4413 · 07-16-2007, 04:43 PM

I really think our stats were deflated last year, so I'm really not surprised at all.

I love getting low balled anyways, so then we can be the feel good story this upcoming season.

firstdown · 07-16-2007, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D'BOYZ

based on last year 22 is about right I was really desapointed with Lloyds and randall production I tought they would be better specially Lloyd not so much Randall he's for me a 5 good plays per year player that's all

What spot did dallas was ranked?

Now you really want us to believe that you where disapointed in Lloyds and El's production last year. Yea right. Come on you usually say it how it is.

firstdown · 07-16-2007, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GusFrerotte

Hearing that at least Lloyd was working with JC during the offseasson a bit does give hope that he will return to 49er form, which will kick ass and automatically open up things for Randle El and Santana. If they play like last year(Llyod and Randle El), our offense is going to stink it up again. Lloyd is better than Randle El for sure and more of a threat.

Also Lloyd has been working out as well. I think that he knows he could be playing this year for his NFL career. Another bad season we would let him go and who would even pick him up and if they did it might be for vet minimum.

GTripp0012 · 07-16-2007, 05:22 PM

See post.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

This analysis is most likely correct, but very simplistic in its nature. I don't think I learned anything I didn't already know from reading this report.

D'BOYZ · 07-16-2007, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by firstdown

Now you really want us to believe that you where disapointed in Lloyds and El's production last year. Yea right. Come on you usually say it how it is.

I was dissapointed i nthe matter that I said you would have 1 of the best receiving sets in the league that with moss game play, Lloyds going in the middle and Randall game changing plays combine with Sauders offense it would be a very deadly offense.

But it turned out to be Vanilla I've never liked Randall I've sai tha tbut I tought Lloyd was a good addition that's why I was dissapointed because I tought it would be a better offense.

atomicnixon · 07-16-2007, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Link: http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/insid...ory?id=2921051

22. Washington Redskins
Obviously, the Redskins did not get their money's worth with the acquisitions of Antwaan Randle El and Brandon Lloyd. They envisioned a dangerous three-receiver attack with these two and Santana Moss. The truth of the matter is that they still have one excellent wideout in Moss and two players who are much better suited as No. 3 receivers. Moss is small, but he is extremely dangerous when healthy. He can turn a hitch route into a 70-yard touchdown in the blink of an eye and can challenge any secondary deep. The Redskins' quarterback output has been subpar and we expect Jason Campbell to be much improved this season, but they simply have to get more from Randle El and Lloyd.

I think it was the new offense. We have hashed this over and over again, but seriously I think our offense will be as explosive as the '91 Redskins. As for the defense, that remains to be seen.

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 07-16-2007, 07:42 PM

That's funny at this time last year, we would have been like 3rd or 4th.

GTripp0012 · 07-16-2007, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

That's funny at this time last year, we would have been like 3rd or 4th.

And were.

Shows how much these "rankings" are worth.

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 07-16-2007, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

And were.

Shows how much these "rankings" are worth.

exactly.

GTripp0012 · 07-16-2007, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

exactly.

right-e-o.

I'm being sucked into your game, Quake.

07-16-2007, 04:06 PM	#1
Mattyk ‎\m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40 Posts: 72,722	Scouts Inc WR rankings Link: http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/insid...ory?id=2921051 22. Washington Redskins Obviously, the Redskins did not get their money's worth with the acquisitions of Antwaan Randle El and Brandon Lloyd. They envisioned a dangerous three-receiver attack with these two and Santana Moss. The truth of the matter is that they still have one excellent wideout in Moss and two players who are much better suited as No. 3 receivers. Moss is small, but he is extremely dangerous when healthy. He can turn a hitch route into a 70-yard touchdown in the blink of an eye and can challenge any secondary deep. The Redskins' quarterback output has been subpar and we expect Jason Campbell to be much improved this season, but they simply have to get more from Randle El and Lloyd. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

07-16-2007, 04:15 PM	#4
dmek25 MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 51 Posts: 10,442	Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings im not the ultimate homer, but come on. can anyone name more then 5 or 6 that are better? __________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan

07-16-2007, 04:33 PM	#5
D'BOYZ The Starter Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 1,345	Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings based on last year 22 is about right I was really desapointed with Lloyds and randall production I tought they would be better specially Lloyd not so much Randall he's for me a 5 good plays per year player that's all What spot did dallas was ranked?

07-16-2007, 04:43 PM	#6
RobH4413 Wildcard Bitches Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Bethesda, MD Age: 27 Posts: 2,382	Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings I really think our stats were deflated last year, so I'm really not surprised at all. I love getting low balled anyways, so then we can be the feel good story this upcoming season. __________________ This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps!

07-16-2007, 07:42 PM	#12
EARTHQUAKE2689 You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24 Posts: 11,010	Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings That's funny at this time last year, we would have been like 3rd or 4th. __________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it.

07-16-2007, 04:10 PM	#2
GusFrerotte Playmaker Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Detroit area Posts: 3,961	Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings Hearing that at least Lloyd was working with JC during the offseasson a bit does give hope that he will return to 49er form, which will kick ass and automatically open up things for Randle El and Santana. If they play like last year(Llyod and Randle El), our offense is going to stink it up again. Lloyd is better than Randle El for sure and more of a threat.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Scouts Inc WR rankings

Redskins Locker Room