Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Scouts Inc WR rankings

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-16-2007, 04:06 PM   #1
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 79,418
Scouts Inc WR rankings

Link: http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/insid...ory?id=2921051

22. Washington Redskins
Obviously, the Redskins did not get their money's worth with the acquisitions of Antwaan Randle El and Brandon Lloyd. They envisioned a dangerous three-receiver attack with these two and Santana Moss. The truth of the matter is that they still have one excellent wideout in Moss and two players who are much better suited as No. 3 receivers. Moss is small, but he is extremely dangerous when healthy. He can turn a hitch route into a 70-yard touchdown in the blink of an eye and can challenge any secondary deep. The Redskins' quarterback output has been subpar and we expect Jason Campbell to be much improved this season, but they simply have to get more from Randle El and Lloyd.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 07-16-2007, 04:10 PM   #2
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

Hearing that at least Lloyd was working with JC during the offseasson a bit does give hope that he will return to 49er form, which will kick ass and automatically open up things for Randle El and Santana. If they play like last year(Llyod and Randle El), our offense is going to stink it up again. Lloyd is better than Randle El for sure and more of a threat.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 04:10 PM   #3
Karma Chameleon (I come and go)
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Annapolis, MD
Age: 29
Posts: 3,087
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Link: http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/insid...ory?id=2921051

22. Washington Redskins
Obviously, the Redskins did not get their money's worth with the acquisitions of Antwaan Randle El and Brandon Lloyd. They envisioned a dangerous three-receiver attack with these two and Santana Moss. The truth of the matter is that they still have one excellent wideout in Moss and two players who are much better suited as No. 3 receivers. Moss is small, but he is extremely dangerous when healthy. He can turn a hitch route into a 70-yard touchdown in the blink of an eye and can challenge any secondary deep. The Redskins' quarterback output has been subpar and we expect Jason Campbell to be much improved this season, but they simply have to get more from Randle El and Lloyd.
Based on last season, I would be somewhat inclined to agree with him. HOWEVA, I expect both Randle El and Lloyd to be MUCH improved this season. I think Randle El could very possibly break out and establish himself as a legit #2 and I, personally, love what he brings to the table as a wild card offensively. I think this group will be much better this season with a QB who can stretch the field and a better comfort level with the offense and Jason Campbell.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack
Albert Connell is perhaps the worst Redskin I ever had the misfortune of meeting. He's the kind of guy that makes media people covering their favorite team growing up no longer like that team
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 04:15 PM   #4
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 52
Posts: 10,504
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

im not the ultimate homer, but come on. can anyone name more then 5 or 6 that are better?
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 04:33 PM   #5
The Starter
 
D'BOYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,363
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

based on last year 22 is about right I was really desapointed with Lloyds and randall production I tought they would be better specially Lloyd not so much Randall he's for me a 5 good plays per year player that's all

What spot did dallas was ranked?
D'BOYZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 04:43 PM   #6
Wildcard Bitches
 
RobH4413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 28
Posts: 2,476
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

I really think our stats were deflated last year, so I'm really not surprised at all.

I love getting low balled anyways, so then we can be the feel good story this upcoming season.
__________________
This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps!
RobH4413 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 04:52 PM   #7
Registered User
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 49
Posts: 15,818
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by D'BOYZ View Post
based on last year 22 is about right I was really desapointed with Lloyds and randall production I tought they would be better specially Lloyd not so much Randall he's for me a 5 good plays per year player that's all

What spot did dallas was ranked?
Now you really want us to believe that you where disapointed in Lloyds and El's production last year. Yea right. Come on you usually say it how it is.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 04:55 PM   #8
Registered User
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 49
Posts: 15,818
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
Hearing that at least Lloyd was working with JC during the offseasson a bit does give hope that he will return to 49er form, which will kick ass and automatically open up things for Randle El and Santana. If they play like last year(Llyod and Randle El), our offense is going to stink it up again. Lloyd is better than Randle El for sure and more of a threat.
Also Lloyd has been working out as well. I think that he knows he could be playing this year for his NFL career. Another bad season we would let him go and who would even pick him up and if they did it might be for vet minimum.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 05:22 PM   #9
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 26
Posts: 15,963
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

See post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
This analysis is most likely correct, but very simplistic in its nature. I don't think I learned anything I didn't already know from reading this report.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 05:30 PM   #10
The Starter
 
D'BOYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,363
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
Now you really want us to believe that you where disapointed in Lloyds and El's production last year. Yea right. Come on you usually say it how it is.
I was dissapointed i nthe matter that I said you would have 1 of the best receiving sets in the league that with moss game play, Lloyds going in the middle and Randall game changing plays combine with Sauders offense it would be a very deadly offense.

But it turned out to be Vanilla I've never liked Randall I've sai tha tbut I tought Lloyd was a good addition that's why I was dissapointed because I tought it would be a better offense.
D'BOYZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 07:10 PM   #11
Special Teams
 
atomicnixon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 28
Posts: 174
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Link: http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/insid...ory?id=2921051

22. Washington Redskins
Obviously, the Redskins did not get their money's worth with the acquisitions of Antwaan Randle El and Brandon Lloyd. They envisioned a dangerous three-receiver attack with these two and Santana Moss. The truth of the matter is that they still have one excellent wideout in Moss and two players who are much better suited as No. 3 receivers. Moss is small, but he is extremely dangerous when healthy. He can turn a hitch route into a 70-yard touchdown in the blink of an eye and can challenge any secondary deep. The Redskins' quarterback output has been subpar and we expect Jason Campbell to be much improved this season, but they simply have to get more from Randle El and Lloyd.
I think it was the new offense. We have hashed this over and over again, but seriously I think our offense will be as explosive as the '91 Redskins. As for the defense, that remains to be seen.
atomicnixon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 07:42 PM   #12
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 25
Posts: 11,703
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

That's funny at this time last year, we would have been like 3rd or 4th.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0

This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI

Awesome isn't it.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 08:18 PM   #13
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 26
Posts: 15,963
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
That's funny at this time last year, we would have been like 3rd or 4th.
And were.

Shows how much these "rankings" are worth.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 08:30 PM   #14
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 25
Posts: 11,703
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
And were.

Shows how much these "rankings" are worth.

exactly.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0

This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI

Awesome isn't it.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 08:31 PM   #15
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 26
Posts: 15,963
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
exactly.
right-e-o.

I'm being sucked into your game, Quake.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.29197 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25