![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #31 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: 2 Minutes away from Fedex Field, Maryland
Posts: 326
| Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #32 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: richmond va Age: 51
Posts: 250
| Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot i believe this in my heart of hearts. lloyd must and will step up this season and be a threat . his career depend on it really if u think about it. who else is going to take a chance on a overpaid , underachieving head case wide out after 2 teams get the same results. he has to see this if only for his own good....
__________________ I will choose freewill. alex, geddy, and neil permanent waves 1980"www.rush.com |
| | |
| | #33 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Trinity, NC Age: 41
Posts: 1,444
| Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #34 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,751
| Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot LLoyd's numbers were pathetic last year (all-time record low for a #2 WR) and went far beyond the collective struggles of the offense. We still had guys that produced offensively, and along with his lack of production his attitude problems were probably a bigger concern. |
| | |
| | #35 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,751
| Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot Yeah there's really no comparing the two. Clark was a gamer that gave it all on the field. Lloyd so far has been a punk that hasn't shown us anything on the field. |
| | |
| | #36 | |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: 31 Spooner St. Age: 38
Posts: 9,534
| Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot Quote:
absolutely agree with this assessment. Clark was one of the all time best Skins wr's, it's a slap in his face to be compared to Lloyd. For as much as I think Lloyd will come around, I don't think anyone quite understands that in order to produce, you have to have a viable QB to throw it to you. It wasn't all Lloyds fault.
__________________ Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin | |
| | |
| | #37 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,554
| Re: ARE vs. Llyod for the number 2 WR spot Quote:
__________________ It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. | |
| | |
| | #38 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,471
| Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot Without a doubt Gary Clark's receiving ability has shown to be superior to Lloyd's but there's not a lot of dissimiliarity in attitude. Something that easy to overlook when your catching 75+ 1200+ yards and 8+ TDs every year. Don't get me wrong. I love Gary Clark. He's basically a local legend down in these parts (SW VA).
__________________ "I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
| | |
| | #39 | |
| RG Glee Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 33
Posts: 7,897
| Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot Quote:
I question Brandon Lloyd's work ethic and his attention to detail. He's a straight up burner, and just wants to use his speed. So far in his career, he has shown no interest in improving on the nuances of route-running. I'll be very surprised if he has a good season. I think he's a total bum. | |
| | |
| | #40 | |
| Living Legend ![]() Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: chesapeake, va Age: 49
Posts: 15,206
| Re: ARE vs. Llyod for the number 2 WR spot Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #41 |
| RG Glee Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 33
Posts: 7,897
| Re: ARE vs. Llyod for the number 2 WR spot I'll have to dig it up; I'm pretty sure it was mentioned in JLC's blog. |
| | |
| | #42 |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 43
| Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot In my outlook, I would like to see our #3 receiver have solid stats as well. So if Lloyd is a #3 I just want to see him put up Brandon Stokley numbers. |
| | |
| | #43 |
| Living Legend ![]() Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: chesapeake, va Age: 49
Posts: 15,206
| Re: ARE vs. Llyod for the number 2 WR spot |
| | |
| | #44 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,471
| Re: ARE vs. Llyod for the number 2 WR spot I believe you're right, firstdown. I don't think Campbell was able to work out with any of the receivers during the off-season, not just Lloyd. I'm npt including OTA's, of course.
__________________ "I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
| | |
| | #45 |
| Living Legend ![]() Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: chesapeake, va Age: 49
Posts: 15,206
| Re: ARE vs. Llyod for the number 2 WR spot Thats what I remember but several here are bashing him for something that he may or may not of had any control. Yes, he did have a bad year but dang Moss's number where down by about half from the prior year. We do know that Lloyd spent the off season working hard to get into shape so why not wait until the season to see if he is ready to get thing going. I do think that thrash should see more time on the field because it just seems that he makes the plays when we need them. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |