![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #16 | |
| Eternally Legendary ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 33
Posts: 9,738
| Re: New NFL.com at 5pm, new website to start 2007 season...? Quote:
__________________ RG3, RGIII, RG三, RG३, RGγʹ, RGג, RG٣, RG๓, RG..., RG셋, RGԳ! | |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #17 |
| The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: The Southeast Age: 29
Posts: 2,119
| Re: New NFL.com at 5pm, new website to start 2007 season...? Ah very true. Never looked at the source, just assumed.
__________________ Your post count, reputation score, popularity ranking, VIP tag or funny signature has no bearing on how I value you as an individual. |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Eternally Legendary ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 33
Posts: 9,738
| Re: New NFL.com at 5pm, new website to start 2007 season...? Quote:
AJAX can also be used to update dynamic content and content that changes often (i.e. ESPN.com's scoreboard page updates individual game scores, down information, and time remaining every so often). With AJAX one has to be careful because you can potentially overload your sever with too many requests. For example, if 10 users are viewing ESPN.com's scoreboard page, there are 10 games being played, and individual game information is updated every 5 seconds will results in 1200 requests to the server per minute (10 games * 10 users * (60 sec / 5 sec) = 1200 requests per min). Of course ESPN.com has $$ and the hardware to handle millions of requests per/sec, your server definitely won't! If site doesn't have a lot of content and isn't very dynamic there's no need to utilize AJAX. p.s. AJAX is the brainchild of Microsoft so lets give credit where it's due (hint: not Google). We were developing AJAX applications for Internet Explorer at my old job way before Google.
__________________ RG3, RGIII, RG三, RG३, RGγʹ, RGג, RG٣, RG๓, RG..., RG셋, RGԳ! | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |