![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #16 | |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade Quote:
Good points. The defense generally is ahead of the game at this point in the season; the offense is much more timing oriented. That being said, let's look at Pucillo tonight to see how he fairs against an aggresive defense. | |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #17 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Manassas Age: 42
Posts: 3,048
| Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade They have their work cut out again. I'd hate to have to pass block against those guys. They come from every which way. We shall see what happens. What I hate is that if they suck again it will be a full blown media thing this week. What's wrong with the offense? You get one pass in the pre-season, I guess, befor the hyenas start gathering. It would be better to avoid all that even if they really are going to suck.
__________________ This Monkey's Gone to Heaven |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Fighting off The Crazies Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Virginia Beach Age: 39
Posts: 5,280
| Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade Quote:
Of course, the Redskins could solve that by coming out and kicking ass tonight. I guess that would be asking too much though, from this team. In preseason, they always seem to give everybody watching plenty of reason for doubt. | |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade Quote:
I would really like to see the offense put together two or three nice drives. Even if we don't score a ton of points, march down field for once. | |
| | |
| | #20 |
| The Starter Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: round the way Age: 30
Posts: 2,211
| Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade one thing is for sure, if we dont draft a O-lineman in the 1st or 2nd round next year, we are screwed.
__________________ SOMEBODY PINCH ME |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Bluffton, South Carolina
Posts: 803
| Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade I say we put Mike Pucillo in over Todd Wade because Mike Pucillo is actually accustomed to being a guard. |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: May 2004 Age: 34
Posts: 9,232
| Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade Well clearly Pucillo makes this team. He gives us depth at C and G and looked just fine tonight. |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Fighting off The Crazies Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Virginia Beach Age: 39
Posts: 5,280
| Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade Yes, there was clear improvement from last week to tonight. Wasn't Campbell sacked like three times against the Titans in the first quarter or so? There was far better O-line protection -- hopefully Pucillo is the missing piece of the puzzle. |
| | |
| | #24 |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade You have to figure that Wade is now behind simply by missing this game. They still haven't had time to really evaluate him at the position. |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: May 2004 Age: 34
Posts: 9,232
| Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade I'll preface this by saying that I was a huge fan of moving Wade to G. The raves he got last year and his performance when he played showed he is at worst a decent NFL RT. That couple with the supposed easyness of the G position made me believe that a decent T could probably be a decent G. I mean G is supposed to be the easiest position on the field. I started becoming concerned when the rhetoric about Wade switched from "Man he looks great in practice" to "Well his is making a tough adjustment and he is working hard on overcoming the difficulties." Seems to me that it really shouldn't be all that hard. Now that the rhetoric has not changed and he is missing time I am pretty much convinced he can't do it. Just a gut feeling but I think this experiment ends soon. Too bad whit got hurt like he did. I suspect he could have been decent for us. |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Fairfax, VA Age: 36
Posts: 4,261
| Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 110
| Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade NEXT choice plz ....? I hope Wade will be able to make the transition, only these next few games will tell, IMO they are probually about even, below average at this point. It will be great to get CS back! |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: va Age: 45
Posts: 890
| Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade either way we will have a problem there this year |
| | |
| | #29 | |
| Thank You, Sean. ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Gaithersburg, MD Age: 27
Posts: 7,360
| Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade Quote:
However, no matter how you look at it, we're going to miss Dock. Not saying we should have paid him that type of money, but we are defintley taking a huge step down at that position, and I think we'll see that while Dockery may not be an elite gaurd, he's much better than "average" like many people want to belive.
__________________ #21 | |
| | |
| | #30 | |
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Fairfax, VA Age: 36
Posts: 4,261
| Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade Quote:
If we struggle with the three time pro-bowler in, then I will worry. Right now I like what I saw from last week to this one. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |