![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #16 |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: Is The NFC East Back? |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #17 |
| The Starter Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,545
| Re: Is The NFC East Back? No disrespect intended, I concur with the Giants statement, but how can you justify your statement that the Skins "are starting to show more life and the ability to win games" when they have lost 2 of thier last 3 games? Not to mention they were leading at halftime in those 2 losses. |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Lake Travis, Texas Age: 32
Posts: 786
| Re: Is The NFC East Back? |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Lake Travis, Texas Age: 32
Posts: 786
| Re: Is The NFC East Back? Quote:
you have a point but let me explain. the skins defense has been outstanding especially the last few games. our offense looked terrible last week againsed green bay but dont expect santana moss to ever have a game like that again. a very bad game, but yes the skins are improving. | |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 8,103
| Re: Is The NFC East Back? Quote:
Honestly, right now, we are just an average football team. I know people don't want to hear it but it's the truth and sometimes the truth hurts. With that being said if we can cut out the stupid mistakes then we can be a good team and maybe even a playoff team. | |
| | |
| | #21 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,653
| Re: Is The NFC East Back? Good teams do lose games to lesser opponents on occassion, I think people tend to forget that at times. Other than the fumble return for a TD and that big pass play to Lee, the Packers did absolutely nothing all day. As for the Giants I think we're starting to see that their 0-2 start was more of a fluke than anything. The Skins beat themselves last week. I simply don't buy that Green Bay is a better team. |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Is The NFC East Back? Quote:
Few teams have LEs as good as Kampman and it was clear that neither Wade nor Heyer could handle him on that day. How many teams are we going to play this year that will break down our pass pro the way Kampman did? Speed rushers have done crap against us this year. They try to go around Samuels and he makes them look foolish. They get out of their lanes, and Campbell escapes. We don't play Tennessee, we don't play Kansas City, we don't play Pittsburgh. Do you think NE is going to get a bunch of pressure against us? I doubt it. Campbell has to make it his job to not leave the pocket just because it helped against GB. Makes the throw longer and disrupts the timing of the routes. Moss will rebound if he's healthy, no doubt about it.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Is The NFC East Back? Quote:
In a game in which not a lot of points are scored, a few fluky plays can decide a game. That's why I am generally a proponent of big passing offense. I don't like to leave the outcome of a game to chance. Although the passing offense is the strength of our team, we are still a pretty balanced offense. We just don't generate big plays in the running game. In this case, two plays were enough to do us in, when all the other actions that occured in that game would have resulted in a Redskin win. Did we get any fluky plays to fall our way? Well some calls in the end zone on that Green Bay drive went for us, but nothing like the unfortuante inability to not ever recover a fumble. Not only is this stuff correctable, but it doesn't really even need to be corrected. We just need to keep playing like we have been and good things will happen. Holding on to the ball doesn't hurt though.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Swearinger ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC Age: 34
Posts: 12,623
| Re: Is The NFC East Back? Quote:
__________________ Insert witty signature here | |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 48
Posts: 2,917
| Re: Is The NFC East Back? Tripp, I believe you're onto something there. With Gibbs's conservative approach, there is very little margin for error. Only occasionally do we score more than 2 TDs in a game anymore, so giving one up on offense or special teams is usually a killer. |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Swearinger ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC Age: 34
Posts: 12,623
| Re: Is The NFC East Back? Quote:
__________________ Insert witty signature here | |
| | |
| | #27 | |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: Is The NFC East Back? Quote:
http://www.redskinswarpath.com/locke...edictions.html | |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Swearinger ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC Age: 34
Posts: 12,623
| Re: Is The NFC East Back? Quote: Unfortunately our stinkin 2nd half collapse against them in our house has spurred a 4 game winning streak. Damn.
__________________ Insert witty signature here | |
| | |
| | #29 |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: Is The NFC East Back? Pretty much. And that's what makes them scary. If the locker room doesn't become a headline every week, the Giants could be hard to beat when they just play football. |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 726
| Re: Is The NFC East Back? agree with matty here...we lose to green bay, but we are the better team...got unlucky with drops (both Offensively and defensively)...the D looks good. we will start winning again...starting sunday.
__________________ in writing these daily letters and trying to make them interesting it is always possible that some sentiment may occur which has not received the severe and deliberate scrutiny and reconsideration which should attach to a State Paper. - Churchill |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |