![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,208
| New Playoff System I dont like change very much and Im not a huge fan of Goodwell, but this sounds like a decent idea to me. Plus it might benefit the NFC East the most, if we truely are back: Should we change the playoff structure? - NFL Experts Blog - NFL - Yahoo! Sports |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #2 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,693
| Re: New Playoff System Why fix what's not broken? |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Maryland Age: 35
Posts: 237
| Re: New Playoff System Leave the current system alone. The teams that lost at home need to play a hell of a lot harder during the playoffs to "protect their house" (quoting Eric Ogbogu from Under Armour).
__________________ Let's Go Redskins!!! R.I.P. Sean Taylor #21 |
| | |
| | #4 |
| RG Glee Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 33
Posts: 7,895
| Re: New Playoff System A summary of the idea would have been good, and spelling Goodell's name right would have been good. Basically this article just suggests that no changes be made to the current playoff format EXCEPT that homefield advantage be determined by record only. As it stands now, if a Wild Card team finishes 12-4, they will have a lower seed than a division winner who finishes 9-7. The article is suggesting to change that so that playoff seeding simply follows the record and ignores whether the team is a division winner or wildcard. I like it. You keep the 12-team format, division winners still automatically make it even if there are 3 wildcard contenders with better records (which preserves rivalries because your primary objective is to beat your division rivals), the only difference is determining seeding for homefield. Doesn't seem right to me that the Giants (10-6) were seeded below the Bucs (9-7) this season. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,208
| Re: New Playoff System Sorry, next time synopsis and spell check included. I kinda feel like teams that wrap up there divisions early deserve the right to rest some key players, especially a team like Tampa who didn’t have a first round bye. But at the same time it would make for some much better games late in the season. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: staten island Age: 37
Posts: 452
| Re: New Playoff System I understand the logic, it definitely makes sense. However, I think they definitely needs to be a reward for winning your division. If a wild-card team has a record of 12-4, chances are the other two teams in the division were terrible. Would it shock anyone if the NFC East Champ next year is 9-7 or 10-6? Wouldn't shock me as I could see all 4 teams beating the $h!t out of each other in their match-ups and splitting the games down the middle. I would be p!ssed if the Giants went 10-6, won the division, but had to go on the road for the first week and play Chicago who won the wild-card at 11-5, yet had Minnesota and Detroit win 8 games between them.
__________________ "Everyone is talking about their dynasty. Well, OUR DYNASTY STARTS TONIGHT."--Michael Strahan, pre-game huddle Pep talk, February 3rd, 2008. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 34
Posts: 14,884
| Re: New Playoff System Leave it alone. COLLEGE football needs the reform. |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| RG Glee Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 33
Posts: 7,895
| Re: New Playoff System Quote:
Teams shouldn't be doing it because it kills momentum, and from a fan perspective the week 17 product isn't nearly as good as the first 16 weeks. | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: New Playoff System Quote:
The first two times the Giants and Cowboys met, the clear-cut better team won. The third time, it was a lot, a lot closer. Makes logical sense that the game was more competitive, and that the Giants eventually pulled it out.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,693
| Re: New Playoff System Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
| Re: New Playoff System Agreed. I loved this quote: Quote:
__________________ Stop reading my signature. | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: FRANCE
Posts: 111
| Re: New Playoff System I'm sure Charlie Batch and Jim Sorgi will appreciate....lol even though I agree with that.
__________________ I'm zorny |
| | |
| | #13 |
| ^21^ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Richmond, Virginia Age: 41
Posts: 1,601
| Re: New Playoff System Not broken? Redskins haven't had a home playoff game since 1999. I say change it maybe that'll be the impetus for another Redskins playoff win!
__________________ GO SKINS!!! ^21^ |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Naega jeil jal naga ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 27
Posts: 13,957
| Re: New Playoff System Hell naw, its tradicion. We cant be havin none of that fancy fare playoff crap. we done gotta rely on da good ole boy network and keep them west cost hippies out of da chamionshi'p game. gooooo dawgs crap at this rate the dawgs 'll neva get in da bcs championship. sad face
__________________ Flacco is 1337 Fanclub President |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Banned Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 542
| Re: New Playoff System leave it alone cause it's fine.why turn it into the nba playoffs which are a joke?it's college football that needs to have a revamped bowl system. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |