Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Game Positives and Negatives

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-15-2004, 12:09 AM   #1
Impact Rookie
 
CRT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rockville
Age: 51
Posts: 795
Game Positives and Negatives

Positives
Starting O-line
The Rock, Sultan, Coles, Cooley, Mcants
D-line
S. Taylor Forced Fumble
SPECIAL TEAMS

Negatives
Ramsey (2 Fumbles and 1 Interception)
Portis - No Spunk in his step, not patient
Jacobs - Lined up wrong on 2 occasions - Looked confused
Penalties
Backup Coners
CRT3 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 08-15-2004, 12:30 AM   #2
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 31
Posts: 16,247
our 3rd string secondary is complete crap, QBs all sucked tonight...
scott and simon did well, as did smoot, and the starting O-line held the panthers off well.

Taylor got some good hits, and he's really fast... no picks, but he definately showed up to play. Rock was bad early, but made up for it later in the game. Lemons (59) played very well for his limited time...

OUR 1st DEFENSE CAN HOLD THE RUN... they weren't blitzing like crazy this game, and they were able to get 3 stops when the panthers were 3 yards off the goal line... lots of stuffing the runner, but part of that may be a crapper panthers O-line run support...

stempke, hall, and kimrin all kicked, and all looked fine (kimrin squibs punts a lot though).
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2004, 09:18 AM   #3
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 28
Posts: 7,497
Theres no way Portis is a negative. He ran 5 times, proboly the same little dive or counter.
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2004, 10:24 AM   #4
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Age: 28
Posts: 4,439
backup d lineman looked good, at least Greg White and Ron Warner did. Gari Scot has potential, just needs to finish his routes.
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2004, 10:39 AM   #5
Camp Scrub
 
SittingBull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fairfax< VA
Posts: 89
Lets hope the coaching staff can turn Lemons into lemonade
SittingBull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2004, 11:36 AM   #6
Propane and propane accessories
 
JWsleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 45
Posts: 4,587
lol
__________________
Hail from Houston!
JWsleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2004, 12:54 PM   #7
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 32
Posts: 5,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by SittingBull
Lets hope the coaching staff can turn Lemons into lemonade
for anyone that listened to the game with the link that redskins rat provided, tell me that this doesnt sound like something they would have said!! Carolina has some excentric weirdos doing commentary for them.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2004, 04:17 PM   #8
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Age: 28
Posts: 4,439
the offense isnt looking good tho. only the o-line. Kenyatta Jones was solid.
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2004, 04:45 PM   #9
The Starter
 
RedskinPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Camino,Ca
Posts: 1,174
I bet Jones has a better season then Samuels when all is said and done. As big as Samuels is he should be kicking ass! I think he is over rated. He needs to get mean! Put some people on their ass. All I heard last season was the O attack is to passive because of the pass blocking all the time. Well now it's time to run and he still is passive! I hope Joe Bugel can make me wrong about Samuels be cause he cost TWO first round picks to get him!
RedskinPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2004, 06:46 PM   #10
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 31
Posts: 16,247
the O is aenemic because of the number of different plays they're running (seems like 1 pass, 1 run)... you can't water down a football gameplan much more than that... QB'ing when the defensive memorizes both of all two of your awesome plays is really tough.

I bet they all start looking a lot better at tampa...
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 01:02 AM   #11
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 38
Posts: 2,631
fumbling snaps and throwing bad INTs is NOwhere on the playbook...
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 02:59 AM   #12
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 31
Posts: 16,247
correct, there's no reason for fumbling snaps... the ints are partially due to being too predictable.
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 03:06 AM   #13
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 31
Posts: 16,247
i said if taylor did well after tampa i'd forget about his offseason, but it seems i'm already having trouble remembering what all that fuss was about...
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 07:13 AM   #14
Impact Rookie
 
CRT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rockville
Age: 51
Posts: 795
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedskinPete
I hope Joe Bugel can make me wrong about Samuels be cause he cost TWO first round picks to get him!
What 2 1st Round Picks? We finsihed bad that year adn recieved the 3 pick in the draft and the previous year we traded down with the Saints, so they could pick Rickey Williams and we picked Champ. We also recieved their number 1 the next year which was the 2nd pick in the 1st Round. Who did we get , Lavar!!! So maybe I meesed somthing but how did he cost us 2 first rounders?
CRT3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 08:18 AM   #15
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 80,517
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRT3
What 2 1st Round Picks? We finsihed bad that year adn recieved the 3 pick in the draft and the previous year we traded down with the Saints, so they could pick Rickey Williams and we picked Champ. We also recieved their number 1 the next year which was the 2nd pick in the 1st Round. Who did we get , Lavar!!! So maybe I meesed somthing but how did he cost us 2 first rounders?
seriously, someone's math doesn't add up here
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.30072 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25