Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Cerrato: Skins won't be a big player in free agency

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-23-2008, 10:38 AM   #1
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,219
Cerrato: Skins won't be a big player in free agency

Redskins Insider

Mark Maske reports that Vinny Cerrato spoke at the combine this afternoon and is promising a quiet free-agency period. According to Mark, Cerrato said: "Our cap situation is okay. I just think there's a limited number of guys in free agency. The price of what guys are going to be paid is astronomical. I don't foresee us being a big player. It'll be a shock to some, but I don't see us being a big player in free agency. I don't think Dan's plane will be getting fired up and ready to go. I just think it'll be a quiet start to free agency for us."

On Cartwright: "Rock was a very productive player for us. I think he wants to see what his value is on the open market."

On Collins, "I think he wants to see what's out there. I think he wants to see if there's an opportunity for him to be a starting quarterback. If not, I think he's very open to coming back."

On Springs: "I think we're on the same page with Shawn."
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-23-2008, 10:43 AM   #2
Camp Scrub
 
sbaughone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 72
Re: Cerrato: Skins won't be a big player in free agency

That's just like the V-man...right when he gets all the juice he shuts down Redskin One. What the hell are we supposed to do in March?
__________________
www.OntheRAC.com
sbaughone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 10:44 AM   #3
Impact Rookie
 
Stuck in TX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Age: 28
Posts: 545
Re: Cerrato: Skins won't be a big player in free agency

I dont think Cartwright will do well in the FA, so thats why I think he will be back if not this season, next season.

As far as a quiet FA goes, that is great news IMO. building through the draft is the best bet. I do hope we go after at least a couple middle-sized-named FA's to help develop our team in the WCO. We have a former QB coach at the head of a team with a great young QB who has tons of potential, we have a team that made the playoffs two of the past three years, and there is alot of great talent out there in the draft. I think we are going to be okay without having to sign every huge name FA out there in hopes of buying a SB ring. I feel kinda bad for the youngsters on this site. thats all they know and will be outraged by this thread.
__________________
We will miss you Sean.
RIP
1983-2007

REMEMBER VT
Go Hokies
Stuck in TX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 10:44 AM   #4
Camp Scrub
 
goingdeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 46
Re: Cerrato: Skins won't be a big player in free agency

we need to go get vilma
goingdeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 11:02 AM   #5
Playmaker
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 43
Posts: 4,916
Re: Cerrato: Skins won't be a big player in free agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by goingdeep View Post
we need to go get vilma
Why and where would he play? He's a MLB, we just spent $$ on Fletcher last offseason and he was our defensive MVP and we drafted Blades to back him up/replace him.. I don't see how he's a fit anywhere..
__________________
Challenge Greatness! Be A Leader! Make A Difference!
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 11:15 AM   #6
What will Shanny do this offseason?
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,318
Re: Cerrato: Skins won't be a big player in free agency

There are some nice players on the trade market. I we get that coveted wideout
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 11:39 AM   #7
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 25
Posts: 11,939
Re: Cerrato: Skins won't be a big player in free agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by sbaughone View Post
That's just like the V-man...right when he gets all the juice he shuts down Redskin One. What the hell are we supposed to do in March?

Wear green
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0

This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI

Awesome isn't it.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 01:34 PM   #8
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Cerrato: Skins won't be a big player in free agency

Read this article last night & almost put it in a new thread. Guess I was too tired and/or lazy. Thanks for starting this Matty.

surprised that it wasn't up earlier, this is the most "news" we've had since Zorn was hired. It's he & Vinny's first real take on the roster & offseason.

It sounds good to me & I think you have to believe Vinny for the most part. They might be still plotting on one big move, but cap realities would dictate maybe 1 big signing or a couple mid to low level salary fa's, similar to last year.

Think back to years past, by this time w/just under a week before fa starts, there would already be reports of who the Skins were going to sign, and they often came true. Other than the CJ rumor, there hasn't been any consistent reporting on who the skins might covet, just speculation from the outside.

Vinny, Zorn & Danny seem to be on the right track so far. I'm encouraged.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 01:54 PM   #9
Playmaker
 
SouperMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 3,075
Re: Cerrato: Skins won't be a big player in free agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
Why and where would he play? He's a MLB, we just spent $$ on Fletcher last offseason and he was our defensive MVP and we drafted Blades to back him up/replace him.. I don't see how he's a fit anywhere..
You took the words out of my mouth. With Fletcher starting and Blades providing depth, we have far more pressing needs than at MLB.
SouperMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 02:03 PM   #10
Impact Rookie
 
Skins fan 44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brazil, IN
Age: 43
Posts: 883
Re: Cerrato: Skins won't be a big player in free agency

FOX Sports on MSN - Jay Glazer - Sources: Cowboys land LB Thomas

Just saw where zack thomas is going to the cowturds. How can he do this? I thought free agency period has not started.
__________________
HTTR!
Skins fan 44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 02:56 PM   #11
Playmaker
 
SouperMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 3,075
Re: Cerrato: Skins won't be a big player in free agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skins fan 44 View Post
FOX Sports on MSN - Jay Glazer - Sources: Cowboys land LB Thomas

Just saw where zack thomas is going to the cowturds. How can he do this? I thought free agency period has not started.
Perhaps there's a distinction between FAs whose contracts have expired and those who have been released. I believe that Thomas was released last week, so perhaps he was then free to sign with anyone immediately.
SouperMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 04:14 PM   #12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Cerrato: Skins won't be a big player in free agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouperMeister View Post
Perhaps there's a distinction between FAs whose contracts have expired and those who have been released. I believe that Thomas was released last week, so perhaps he was then free to sign with anyone immediately.
correct, teams have sole negotiating rights w/their players until 2/29 (start of free agency). If they release them, they release negotiating rights.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 05:45 PM   #13
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Cerrato: Skins won't be a big player in free agency

This decision stems more from the lack of ability to be active in FA due mainly to cap restraints.

Cerrato spoke of the astronomical amounts being paid to FA's, that has never seemed to be a deterrent in the past, we're faced with a situation that offeres little other choice.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 05:55 PM   #14
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,219
Re: Cerrato: Skins won't be a big player in free agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan View Post
This decision stems more from the lack of ability to be active in FA due mainly to cap restraints.

Cerrato spoke of the astronomical amounts being paid to FA's, that has never seemed to be a deterrent in the past, we're faced with a situation that offeres little other choice.
It started to be a deterrent last year with how FA deals absolutely blew up sky high. It will probably be more of the same this year.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 05:56 PM   #15
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Cerrato: Skins won't be a big player in free agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan View Post
This decision stems more from the lack of ability to be active in FA due mainly to cap restraints.

Cerrato spoke of the astronomical amounts being paid to FA's, that has never seemed to be a deterrent in the past, we're faced with a situation that offeres little other choice.
You may be right, but you also mention "that has never seemed to be a deterrent in the past" implying that we signed players for big $ in the past when common fiscal sense would dictate otherwise.

Obviously they're limited by the cap, but I think all here could agree that if Danny et al wanted to find cap space to sign somebody they would. Perhaps I'm wrong, but wasn't it pointed out by Schneed & Crazy Canuck that cutting Daniels, Griffin & Springs would free up some space?

I'm trying to look on the bright side & view this as a true sign of change. If they're keeping some vets in leiu of signing some free agents, that's one up for continuity.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.28169 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25