![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #46 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Newport News,Virginia Age: 48
Posts: 4,495
| Re: Saints After Shockey?! Possibly the end of the road in NY for Shockey...? NorthJersey.com: providing local news, sports and classifieds for Northern New Jersey!
__________________ "There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE! |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #47 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,658
| Re: Saints After Shockey?! IMHO............I think it is the end of Shockey and the Giants.People are tired of his me,me,me attitude.I won't do this or that...yeah I still believe he is the best overall TE in the game but he can't stay healthy and Eli seems to do better without him in his face.I say Send him to Cinncy for a draft pick,keep him out of the NFC and but him somewhere cold!:cheeky-sm |
| | |
| | #48 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Springfield, VA Age: 30
Posts: 15,616
| Re: Saints After Shockey?! i don't know how anyone could says he's the best with gates, winslow, and gonzo around. hell, in the nfc east, i'd taken cooley or witten over him any day. his attitude is part of his game, and it doesn't make him a better player.
__________________ Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes! |
| | |
| | #49 |
| Naega jeil jal naga ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 27
Posts: 13,952
| Re: Saints After Shockey?! I think if you're going to argue that Shockey is the best Tight End is the league your best chance of winning is arguing that when healthy Shockey is the most athletically gifted Tight End in the league, the Giants just don't use him properly but yeah, call me a Larry Michael I mean homer, but I'd take Cooley over Shockey any day.
__________________ Flacco is 1337 Fanclub President |
| | |
| | #50 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,658
| Re: Saints After Shockey?! If you read what I said ,I said "Over All",the others are good at one thing or the other.Right now I too would take Cooley...Shockey is a head case. |
| | |
| | #51 |
| Special Teams Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 362
| Re: Saints After Shockey?! It would be great if they let him go! At the very least it would be great if he holds out of training camp for a little bit and the Giants bench him for week 1! This guy is a real good tight end...........With him out of the game all you have to do is double up Plax, stack the box and see if Eli can beat you! We all know he can't! |
| | |
| | #52 | |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,652
| Re: Saints After Shockey?! Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #53 |
| MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 51
Posts: 10,438
| Re: Saints After Shockey?! 4 full pages, and no one wants him here? ( at vet minimum, of course)
__________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
| | |
| | #54 |
| Special Teams Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 362
| Re: Saints After Shockey?! |
| | |
| | #55 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: 129 W 81st street Age: 33
Posts: 3,502
| Re: Saints After Shockey?! The two second half drives against us in week 3 that led to TDs weren't luck. All thos eroad wins last season weren't luck. Don't let your hate for the Giants cloud your judgement. Eli is a very good QB. I admit I was totally wrong about him. He has all the tools to be a HOFer. |
| | |
| | #56 | |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,652
| Re: Saints After Shockey?! Quote:
Consider how well he played throughout the playoffs and don't boil things down to one play. Even then I wouldn't call it luck, he did a great job at escaping the rush and keeping the play alive to just get the throw off. | |
| | |
| | #57 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 33
Posts: 14,884
| Re: Saints After Shockey?! Shockey for Chad Johnson trade?
__________________ Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
| | |
| | #58 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 33
Posts: 14,884
| Re: Saints After Shockey?! ^It would solve problems for both teams (and create new ones).
__________________ Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
| | |
| | #59 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Saints After Shockey?! He also led the league with 20 ints in the regular season, and had a mildly unimpressive 6.3 yards per attempt to go with a totally unimpressive 56.1% completion. Those numbers border on Grossman/Tavaris Jackson/Brodie Croyle levels. I tend to think that there is something sustainable about his maturation in the playoffs, something real about it, but is it possible he was playing a little over his head throwing only one int in the playoffs, considering he threw about 1.25 per game in the regular season last year?
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” |
| | |
| | #60 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,658
| Re: Saints After Shockey?! Quote:
Pats thought the same thing,how did that work out for them? | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |