![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #46 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Bluffton, South Carolina
Posts: 803
| Re: Early W/L offseason predictions (any team)... I used to think Pennington was an average starting quarterback. I always knew he lacked the arm strength, but I thought he made up for it with good decision making, and precise throwing. The things is Pennington does not have the skill sets to carry a team. He needs at least a couple of players around him that can get the job done. Surround Pennington w/ talent, and his mediocrity is not so much an issue. He just doesen't have the skills to build an offense around. |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #47 |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
| Re: Early W/L offseason predictions (any team)... Stop being modest! I think 13 and 3! At liest I hope! lol ! In any case, it's going to be fun! Too much talent, regardless of age, to count out! The team is a whole, and will be a force to reckon with! Watch out nfc east!!!!!!! |
| | |
| | #48 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,152
| Re: Early W/L offseason predictions (any team)... There are four "wins" on the Redskins schedule and four "losses" on it** **I define a 'win' and a 'loss' statistically. A game is considered a "win" if the Redskins season (by my projections) point differential is +35 at home, or if it is +65 on the road. Likewise, I consider a game a loss if the season projected point differential is -35 on the road, or -65 at home. Of course, that doesn't mean the Redskins will win or lose any particular game, that's not the goal of my system. The only goal of my system is to look at every team over the course of the season, and see how many games they are totally overmatched/should dominate in. By simply doing this, I can put together a big picture idea of how each team will do, which is the goal. Just to get close. The most likely outcome of this season is 8-8, but anywhere from 6-10 wins seems reasonable to say. I don't think 10 wins will take the NFC East, but it should be good enough for a wild card.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” |
| | |
| | #49 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Springfield, VA Age: 30
Posts: 15,642
| Re: Early W/L offseason predictions (any team)... ES is calling for you. it seems like it'd be a better fit.
__________________ Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes! |
| | |
| | #50 |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: May 2008 Location: Global
Posts: 28
| Re: Early W/L offseason predictions (any team)... I don't like the Cowboys. |
| | |
| | #51 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Newport News,Virginia Age: 48
Posts: 4,495
| Re: Early W/L offseason predictions (any team)... KoKo...Thats a great WIN/LOSS prediction.....? Don't hold back next time tell us how you really feel....:confused:
__________________ "There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE! |
| | |
| | #52 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 34
Posts: 8,317
| Re: Early W/L offseason predictions (any team)... It's very early and I'm going to get blasted, but I predict a 7-9 season for the Redskins. The defense weakens to a middle-of-the-pack unit and JC doesn't really shine until week 8. On a bright note, Portis excels in the WCO. |
| | |
| | #53 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Herndon, Virginia Age: 20
Posts: 445
| Re: Early W/L offseason predictions (any team)... I predict that the Giants will go 5-11 because of how much a leader Michael Strahan was for their team, and it depends on how Justin Tuck plays replacing him.
__________________ “The unexamined life is not worth living.” Socrates http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/6...rmationgg7.jpg http://www.thehogs.net/sean-taylor/burgundy_heart.jpg |
| | |
| | #54 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Springfield, VA Age: 30
Posts: 15,642
| Re: Early W/L offseason predictions (any team)... tuck and the nyg DL will be fine. they have MK if they want to shift him too. i don't think strahan has that big an impact on their W/L record, but i don't think the gnants will be repeating either.
__________________ Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes! |
| | |
| | #55 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: staten island Age: 37
Posts: 452
| Re: Early W/L offseason predictions (any team)... New England, 18-1!!!!!!
__________________ "Everyone is talking about their dynasty. Well, OUR DYNASTY STARTS TONIGHT."--Michael Strahan, pre-game huddle Pep talk, February 3rd, 2008. |
| | |
| | #56 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: staten island Age: 37
Posts: 452
| Re: Early W/L offseason predictions (any team)... Care to take any action on that?
__________________ "Everyone is talking about their dynasty. Well, OUR DYNASTY STARTS TONIGHT."--Michael Strahan, pre-game huddle Pep talk, February 3rd, 2008. |
| | |
| | #57 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,152
| Re: Early W/L offseason predictions (any team)... Quote:
The schedule is not as tough as it's been the last few years. Like SGG said, the talent on this team doesn't figure to return to the playoffs, and our toughest...like 4 toughest games are within the division. With that said, the easiest way for this team to get back to the playoffs would be to excel within the NFC East. The Cowboys should be good for at least a split, hopefully two wins, but we are going to be hard pressed to pull a win against apparently superior Eagles and Giant squads (and the Cowboys seem superior also, just not quite as much). This is the good news: all of our challenging non-divisional games will be played at home this year. So if this team does miss the playoffs, it's going to be because we were unable to defend our HFA, not because the schedulemakers threw us some bad breaks. We, as fans, will have a tendency to underestimate the loss of our 2004 first rounder for the rest of his career and our 2005 first rounder for the first part of the season. For a team that didn't leave itself a lot of picks in that era, that's going to be downright crippling in the short term. In the future, Jason Campbell will carry this team to where it wants to go. The team will draft intelligently and replace its vets with youth. But for this team, I'm just not very optimistic. We don't have the horses to run with the other teams in our division, and we can blame 100% of that on the football gods because with 16 games of Sean Taylor and Carlos Rogers in the secondary, we absolutely would be able to run with those guys. Instead, we have 16 games of Reed Doughty and Justin Tryon. It sucks, but that's what this team is.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |